japan-gov-proposal-context-adapter

name	japan-gov-proposal-context-adapter
description	Use when the user wants a product, service, or initiative synthesized into 官公庁向け提案・企画書 context. Do not use for neutral background, a direct document summary, or procurement/legal advice.

Japan Gov Proposal Context Adapter

Synthesize verified government context into a proposal argument while keeping official claims distinct from proposal-specific adaptation.

Do Not Use For

• Neutral 課題背景 only; use japan-gov-background-builder.
• Reading a named whitepaper as the primary object; use japan-whitepaper-brief.
• Eligibility, application, procurement, or legal conclusions.

Workflow

1. Define the offer, target public body/stakeholder, desired decision, delivery context, and claims the proposal needs to make.
2. Assemble upstream evidence rather than recreating every search inside this skill:
   • neutral context from japan-gov-background-builder;
   • claim-level support from japan-gov-evidence-finder;
   • owner roles from japan-gov-owner-mapper;
   • current emphasis from japan-gov-priority-checker;
   • budget status only when needed from japan-gov-budget-tracer. Invoke missing components in the same task, then synthesize their outputs.
3. Create a traceability map from each proposal statement to an official source or label it clearly as the user's hypothesis/offer.
4. Separate:
   • 政府資料が明示すること;
   • 提案への適用・解釈;
   • 未検証の前提;
   • 政府資料が支持しないこと.
5. Draft source-faithful wording for problem, policy relevance, proposed contribution, outcomes, and limitations. Include a safer alternative for any overclaim.
6. Stop before procedural, eligibility, or procurement claims. If the offer or target is too underspecified to adapt responsibly, state assumptions and provide only a provisional frame.

Output

• 提案で使う政策文脈
• 政府資料ベースの課題設定
• 提案への接続とtraceability
• 公式記述／適用解釈／未検証前提
• 根拠資料
• 言い過ぎになる表現と安全な言い換え
• 次に必要な制度・予算・調達確認

Guardrails

• Do not imply government endorsement, product necessity, funding eligibility, or procurement fit.
• Do not use general policy language as proof that the proposed solution will work.
• Keep neutral source findings intact when adapting them for persuasion.