| name | mandu-agent-workflow |
| description | Canonical Mandu agent workflow. Use first in Mandu projects before direct
source edits so Codex, Claude Code, Gemini CLI, and other agents follow the
same context -> plan -> apply -> verify -> repair loop.
|
| license | MIT |
| metadata | {"author":"mandu","version":"1.0.0"} |
Mandu Agent Workflow
Mandu is an agent-native fullstack framework. Agents should not begin by
guessing file structure or calling low-level tools directly. Start with the
official agent surface, then use domain tools only when the plan identifies a
specific domain.
When to Use
Use this skill for every Mandu project task that may inspect, create, modify, or
verify application code, framework configuration, contracts, slots, islands, or
deployment artifacts.
Canonical Workflow
Always follow this loop:
context -> plan -> apply -> verify -> repair
context: read the project map.
plan: convert the user request into domains, files, risks, and checks.
apply: prefer intent-level MCP/domain tools; direct edits must be grounded
in the plan.
verify: run the single agent-facing verification report.
repair: convert failures into next actions, then verify again.
Preferred MCP Tools
Use these first when MCP is available:
| Step | Tool | Purpose |
|---|
| context | mandu.agent.context | Project map, routes, APIs, slots, contracts, guard, diagnostics. |
| plan | mandu.agent.plan | Deterministic task plan with domains, files, tools, risks. |
| apply | mandu.agent.apply | Ordered action preview from .mandu/agent-plan.json. |
| verify | mandu.agent.verify | Unified post-change guard/diagnose/contract report. |
| repair | mandu.agent.repair | Structured next actions from .mandu/agent-verify.json. |
If MCP is unavailable, use the CLI equivalents:
mandu agent context --json
mandu agent plan "<task>" --json --write
mandu agent apply --from .mandu/agent-plan.json --json
mandu agent verify --changed --json --write
mandu agent repair --from .mandu/agent-verify.json --json
Allowed File Edits
Direct file edits are allowed only after plan identifies the relevant domain
and the agent has inspected the local pattern. Prefer MCP/domain generation for:
- pages, layouts, and API routes
- contracts and OpenAPI-related files
- slots and fillings
- islands, partials, and hydration boundaries
- deploy intent and provider artifacts
Do not use destructive cleanup, cache removal, deploy execution, or broad
refactors without an explicit plan and verification path.
Domain Skill Escalation
Read the matching domain skill when mandu.agent.plan includes that domain:
| Domain | Skill |
|---|
| route/api | mandu-fs-routes |
| hydration/island/partial | mandu-hydration |
| slot/filling | mandu-slot |
| guard/import boundary | mandu-guard |
| test/e2e/ATE | mandu-testing |
| deploy | mandu-deployment |
| security/auth/session | mandu-security |
| styling/ui/design | mandu-styling, mandu-ui, mandu-composition |
| performance | mandu-performance |
Domain skills are addenda. They must not replace the canonical workflow.
Verification Command
Every code-changing task should end with:
mandu agent verify --changed --json --write
Run additional commands listed in the plan or verify report, usually
bun run typecheck and targeted bun test commands.
Repair Path
When verify fails:
mandu agent repair --from .mandu/agent-verify.json --json
Apply only actions that are explicitly safe and scoped. After any repair, run
mandu agent verify --changed --json --write again.
Common Failures
- Skipping context and editing the wrong route or contract path.
- Calling low-level Guard, Doctor, Fix, ATE, or deploy tools before a plan.
- Treating a domain skill as the full workflow.
- Ending a task after tests without writing or reading the agent verify report.
- Applying broad file changes when
agent.apply only produced a dry-run action
report.