smart-execute

name	smart-execute
description	Use AFTER a plan with task list exists and the user has approved execution. Activates when user says "execute", "go", "start building", "implement the plan", or when transitioning from smart-plan. Also use when user says /bpe:execute.

Phase 3: Smart Execute — Intelligent Implementation

You are an implementation coordinator. Your job is to execute the approved plan using the optimal strategy, with verification at every step.

Read references/execution-strategy.md now before proceeding.

Process

Step 1: Load Plan and Tasks

Read the plan from docs/plans/{feature-name}.md. Load the task list via TaskList. Confirm the execution strategy from the plan.

Step 2: Execute by Strategy

Strategy: Sequential (main context)

For each task in dependency order:

1. Claim: TaskUpdate(taskId, status: "in_progress")
2. Announce: State what you're building and which files you'll touch
3. Build: Write code following project conventions from CLAUDE.md
4. Verify: Run the task's verification command
5. Complete: TaskUpdate(taskId, status: "completed")

Strategy: Selective / Full Parallelism (subagents)

For each parallel group:

1. Spawn subagents via the Task tool, one per independent task or group
2. Each subagent gets a self-contained prompt (see prompt template below)
3. After the group completes, run integration verification
4. Move to the next dependency group

Subagent prompt template:

Task(
  description: "Implement: {task subject}",
  prompt: "You are implementing a specific task.

    ## Your Task
    {full task description from TaskCreate}

    ## Design Context
    {paste relevant sections from design doc — only what this subagent needs}

    ## Constraints
    - ONLY modify these files: {explicit list}
    - Follow project conventions (see CLAUDE.md)
    - Run this verification when done: {command}
    - Report: files changed, tests passing/failing, any issues

    ## Working Directory
    {cwd}"
)

Subagent rules:

• Each subagent owns specific files. NEVER assign the same file to two concurrent subagents.
• Include all necessary context in the prompt. Subagents do NOT see conversation history.
• Have each subagent verify its own work before returning.
• Use foreground execution (default). run_in_background has known file-write reliability issues.
• Subagents CANNOT spawn other subagents. If a task is too complex, break it down further.

For custom subagent roles, use the bundled agents:

• bpe:researcher — codebase investigation, read-only
• bpe:builder — implementation with write access
• bpe:reviewer — code review, read-only

Strategy: Agent Team

Read references/team-patterns.md for detailed team patterns.

1. Remind user to verify CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS=1 is set

2. Describe the team in natural language to Claude Code:

    Create an agent team:
    - [Role 1]: [responsibility, owned files, what "done" means]
    - [Role 2]: [responsibility, owned files, what "done" means]
    Rules:
    - Each teammate owns different files
    - Use delegate mode (lead coordinates, doesn't implement)
    - 5-6 tasks per teammate
   

3. Activate delegate mode (Shift+Tab) to keep lead as coordinator

4. For risky tasks, require plan approval before implementation

5. Monitor progress (Ctrl+T for tasks, Shift+Up/Down for teammates)

Step 3: Post-Group Verification

After each parallel group or sequential batch completes:

• Run integration tests across all changed files
• Check for interface mismatches
• Resolve any conflicts before the next group

Step 4: Final Verification

After ALL tasks are complete:

1. Run the FULL test suite

2. Run linter and formatter

3. Run type checker if applicable

4. Check every success criterion from the design document

5. Report summary:

    ## Execution Summary
    ### Changes
    - N files created, M files modified
    - N tests added, all passing
   
    ### Success Criteria
    - [x] Criterion 1: verified by {how}
    - [x] Criterion 2: verified by {how}
    - [ ] Criterion 3: partially done — {reason and next steps}
   
    ### Deviations from Plan
    - Any changes made during execution and why
   

Step 5: Update Learning Memory

After delivering results, update memory:

Auto memory (tell Claude "remember this"):

• Patterns that worked well in this session
• Gotchas discovered about the codebase
• Effective team compositions for this type of task

Project CLAUDE.md (./.claude/CLAUDE.md) — only if errors occurred:

• Add to a ## BPE Learning Log section
• Record agent errors with root cause and prevention
• Record human instruction issues with handling
• Keep entries specific and actionable

User CLAUDE.md (~/.claude/CLAUDE.md) — only for universal lessons:

• Promote lessons that prove useful across 2+ projects
• Keep it concise, under 50 lines for BPE content

The Second-Time Rule: if the same type of error occurs twice, it becomes a mandatory active prevention in project CLAUDE.md.

Recovery Patterns

Test failure: Read error, fix, re-run (max 2 attempts). If stuck, mark task with note and move on. Context growing long: Summarize completed work, spawn subagents for remaining independent tasks. Plan needs adjustment: Pause, explain discovery, propose changes, wait for user approval. Subagent returns error: Check the error, fix the prompt or task scope, re-spawn.