一键导入
shaping
Use this methodology when collaboratively shaping a solution with the user - iterating on problem definition (requirements) and solution options (shapes).
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
菜单
Use this methodology when collaboratively shaping a solution with the user - iterating on problem definition (requirements) and solution options (shapes).
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Review changes since a fixed point along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match the originating shape, revision description, issue, or PRD?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, revision, PR, working-copy changes, or asks to "review since X".
Control Herdr, a terminal multiplexer for coding agents. Use only when the user explicitly mentions Herdr or asks to use Herdr to inspect or control panes, tabs, workspaces, terminals, commands, or communication with another agent. Do not use merely because a task could benefit from a background terminal, delegation, or parallel work.
Use when the user asks for a rich explanation of a code change, diff, branch, or PR. Produces an interactive HTML page, a Notion page, or an interactive Obsidian vault note.
Session mode — coordinate only, delegate all actual work to background minion subagents
Interview-style session that aligns a plan with the existing domain vocabulary, sharpens terminology, and updates documentation (CONTEXT.md, ADRs) inline as decisions crystallise. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan against their project's language and documented decisions.
Transform a workflow description into affordance tables showing UI and Code affordances with their wiring. Use to map existing systems or design new ones from shaped parts.
| name | shaping |
| description | Use this methodology when collaboratively shaping a solution with the user - iterating on problem definition (requirements) and solution options (shapes). |
A structured approach for collaboratively defining problems and exploring solution options. Keep the active artifact visible, negotiate requirements and shapes with the user, and preserve consistency across the document hierarchy.
Use this skill when the user wants to shape a feature, clarify a problem, compare solution options, turn a selected solution into implementation slices, or continue work in an existing shaping document.
CONSISTENCY.md, CONCEPTS.md, and COMMUNICATION.md. Then read any topic files that match the session:
FIT_CHECKS.mdSHAPE_PARTS.mdBREADBOARDS_AND_SLICING.mdDOCUMENTS.mdSPIKES.mdEXAMPLE.md| Need | Read |
|---|---|
| Document hierarchy, ripple rules, and anti-drift practice | CONSISTENCY.md |
| Requirements, shapes, notation, phases, and possible actions | CONCEPTS.md |
| Fit-check formats, conventions, alternatives, macro fit checks | FIT_CHECKS.md |
| Full-table display, complete artifacts, change markers | COMMUNICATION.md |
| Spike purpose, file management, structure, acceptance, questions | SPIKES.md |
| Breadboards, detailing a selected shape, slicing outputs | BREADBOARDS_AND_SLICING.md |
| Shape-part mechanics, flags, vertical parts, hierarchy | SHAPE_PARTS.md |
| Frame, shaping, slices, slice plans, frontmatter, source material | DOCUMENTS.md |
| Concrete search-feature example | EXAMPLE.md |
Before ending a shaping turn, verify: