一键在 Manus 中运行任何 Skill

specflow-start

星标2

分支0

更新时间2026年7月10日 04:07

Use when unsure which SpecFlow step to run next, or for a quick "where am I / what's next" orientation. Runs `specflow brief --next` for a deterministic next-step recommendation, asks ONE disambiguating question only if intent is ambiguous, and points at the right /specflow-* skill. Triggers on "what should I do," "what's next," "what now," "where do I start," "where are we," "what's the status," "continue," "resume," "remind me where we are," "help me get started," "I'm stuck," "point me in the right direction," or any request that doesn't clearly match a specific lifecycle or review skill. This is the safe default when no other skill clearly fits — prefer routing over guessing. NOT a replacement for the lifecycle skills (discover/plan/execute/ship) or the review skills — it only routes you to the correct one. Prefer this over guessing when the user's intent is vague.

安装

用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。

在 Manus 中运行

来源

Longhuiberkeley

Longhuiberkeley/specflow

打开 GitHub 仓库查看创作者相关仓库

下载

在 Manus 中运行

SpecFlow Start

A thin, host-neutral router: orient on project state, then point at the right next skill.

Workflow

Recall state (deterministic, zero tokens): run uv run specflow brief --next. It reads state.yaml + the artifact graph and prints a single next-step recommendation (e.g. "REQs approved, no ARCH yet → /specflow-plan").
If the recommendation is unambiguous: tell the user exactly which slash-command to run next, and stop. Examples:
- "You have approved REQs but no architecture yet → run /specflow-plan."
- "All stories are implemented → run /specflow-artifact-review (review + V-model tests UT/IT/QT), then /specflow-ship."
- "3 suspects are open → run specflow change-impact (or specflow defect-from-suspect <ID> --req <REQ>), then continue."
If intent is ambiguous, ask ONE disambiguating question, then route. The common ambiguity is the three review skills:

"Reviewing (a) one specific artifact, (b) the impact of recent changes, or (c) the whole project's health?"
- (a) → /specflow-artifact-review
- (b) → /specflow-change-impact-review
- (c) → /specflow-audit
Another: "build X" with no REQs yet → /specflow-discover; with REQs already approved → /specflow-execute. Docs intent — "write/update the docs or README", "cite the spec from a doc", "are the docs stale / out of date" → /specflow-doc.
Do not call the Skill tool yourself. Tell the user which slash-command to run. This keeps routing host-neutral — it works identically on Claude Code, OpenCode, Codex, and the ALM/CLI lane.

Rules

Always run brief --next first — the recommendation is deterministic and free.
At most ONE disambiguating question. If still unclear, surface the brief --next recommendation and let the user choose.
This skill never creates or modifies artifacts; it only orients and routes.

同仓库更多 Skills

同仓库

specflow-audit

Longhuiberkeley/specflow

SCOPE = the whole project. Use for a FULL-PROJECT health review — runs a zero-question deterministic core with optional adversarial wings. Creates AUD and CHL artifacts. Triggers when the user says "audit the project," "health check," "how healthy is the project," "review the whole project," "review overall spec quality," or asks for a comprehensive project-wide assessment. NOT for: single-artifact review (use specflow-artifact-review), reviewing blast radius of recent changes (use specflow-change-impact-review), or quick spot-checks of one file.

2026-07-102

specflow-discover

Longhuiberkeley/specflow

Use to start the SpecFlow requirements discovery workflow — the entry point for any new feature, enhancement, or specification task. Triggers when the user wants to start something NEW — "add a feature," "build a NEW [X]," "I want to create [Z]," "we need [capability]," "capture requirements for," or "what should the system do?" Use this FIRST when the idea is new and no REQ exists yet (if REQs are already approved and stories are queued for coding, use specflow-execute). Also triggers for reverse lifecycle: "rethink the requirements," "revise the requirements," "go back to requirements," or when the user wants to revisit specs after planning or executing. This is step 1 of the core lifecycle — use it FIRST for any new feature or change that needs specification, BEFORE specflow-plan and specflow-execute. NOT for: data exploration, data cleaning, researching technologies, prototyping, running experiments, or technical prep work unrelated to requirements authoring.

2026-07-102

specflow-init

Longhuiberkeley/specflow

Use when setting up SpecFlow in a new or existing project for the FIRST TIME. Triggers when the user says "set up SpecFlow," "initialize the project," or "get started with SpecFlow." Conversational bootstrap that scaffolds directories, installs hooks, generates CI workflows, and recommends next steps. NOT for: re-initializing an already-configured project, adding packs to an existing setup (use specflow-adapter), or routine configuration changes.

2026-07-102

specflow-plan

Longhuiberkeley/specflow

REQUIRED after discover when REQs are approved. Breaks approved requirements into architecture (ARCH), detailed design (DDD), and stories (STORY). Triggers when the user says "design the architecture," "plan the implementation," "break this down," or when REQs are approved and the user is ready to move forward. Also triggers for reverse lifecycle: "rethink the architecture," "revise the plan," "go back to planning," or when the user wants to revisit architecture after executing. This is step 2 of the core lifecycle — use it BEFORE any implementation begins. NOT for: quick bug fixes (use specflow-execute with lean path), research tasks, or infrastructure setup.

2026-07-102

specflow-ship

Longhuiberkeley/specflow

REQUIRED to release a version. Produces a baseline, generates change records (DEC), runs a quick audit, and presents a release summary. Triggers when the user says "release," "ship," "publish v," or asks to tag a version. This is the final step of the core lifecycle — use it when implementation is complete and verified. NOT for: mid-development checkpoints (use specflow-audit or specflow-artifact-review).

2026-07-102

specflow-autoresearch

Longhuiberkeley/specflow

Use when the user wants to run autonomous research loops, set up competitions, review experiment findings, explore competitions, run experiments overnight, set up a benchmark, or promote a deployable finding / productionize a winning experiment back into core requirements. Activates the autoresearch pack's competition-scoped experimentation with knowledge condensation.

2026-07-102

name

specflow-start

description

SpecFlow Start

A thin, host-neutral router: orient on project state, then point at the right next skill.

Workflow

Recall state (deterministic, zero tokens): run uv run specflow brief --next. It reads state.yaml + the artifact graph and prints a single next-step recommendation (e.g. "REQs approved, no ARCH yet → /specflow-plan").
If the recommendation is unambiguous: tell the user exactly which slash-command to run next, and stop. Examples:
- "You have approved REQs but no architecture yet → run /specflow-plan."
- "All stories are implemented → run /specflow-artifact-review (review + V-model tests UT/IT/QT), then /specflow-ship."
- "3 suspects are open → run specflow change-impact (or specflow defect-from-suspect <ID> --req <REQ>), then continue."
If intent is ambiguous, ask ONE disambiguating question, then route. The common ambiguity is the three review skills:

"Reviewing (a) one specific artifact, (b) the impact of recent changes, or (c) the whole project's health?"
- (a) → /specflow-artifact-review
- (b) → /specflow-change-impact-review
- (c) → /specflow-audit
Another: "build X" with no REQs yet → /specflow-discover; with REQs already approved → /specflow-execute. Docs intent — "write/update the docs or README", "cite the spec from a doc", "are the docs stale / out of date" → /specflow-doc.
Do not call the Skill tool yourself. Tell the user which slash-command to run. This keeps routing host-neutral — it works identically on Claude Code, OpenCode, Codex, and the ALM/CLI lane.

Rules

Always run brief --next first — the recommendation is deterministic and free.
At most ONE disambiguating question. If still unclear, surface the brief --next recommendation and let the user choose.
This skill never creates or modifies artifacts; it only orients and routes.