Review uncommitted code changes or branch diff against the plan/target — verify correctness, catch unacceptable deviations and bugs (logic/security/memory/runtime). No new features or over-engineering beyond the plan. Claude applies valid fixes, rebuts invalid points, iterates until consensus or stalemate.
Review/debate plans before implementation between Claude Code and Codex CLI. Can run in plan mode — debates the plan and edits the plan file to fix accepted issues.
Review entire codebases (50-500+ files) by chunking into modules, reviewing each in separate Codex sessions, then synthesizing cross-cutting findings.
Peer debate between Claude Code and Codex on committed code quality. Report + suggest only, no modifications.
Parallel independent review by 4 Claude agents + Codex, followed by merge, debate, and consensus report.
Peer debate between Claude Code and Codex on PR quality and merge readiness. No code modifications.
Security-focused code review using OWASP Top 10 and CWE patterns. Detects vulnerabilities through adversarial debate.
Peer debate between Claude Code and Codex on any technical question. Both think independently, challenge each other, converge to consensus or explicit disagreement.