菜单
Review a technical specification for gaps, confusing explanations, and contradictory specifications. Use when user asks to review, critique, or audit a tech spec, design doc, PRD, or RFC for high-level clarity and consistency. Does not suggest implementation details.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
Implement work from a ticket, spec, or inline description; auto-detects the next item from the task folders when no argument is given.
Show status overview and next steps for an .aiwork/ spec. Use when user says "next steps", "what's left", "status", "progress", or wants to see what's planned, unplanned, or incomplete for a task.
Scan current directory (recursively) for Claude Code skills, slash commands, agents, hooks, and plugin/MCP configs, then render an interactive HTML graph of their explicit and implicit relationships. Use when the user says "skills map", "skill graph", "visualize skills", "map skills", "how do my skills relate", or wants to audit a skill collection before publishing.
Turn the current conversation context into a spec. Use when user wants to create a spec (or PRD) from the current context.
Break a plan, spec, or the current conversation into vertical-slice tickets, each declaring its blocking edges.
Structure AI work artifacts under .aiwork/{YYYY-MM-DD}_{slug}/ folders using the project's protocol (triage, research, spec, prd, plan, review, notes, docs/). Use when the user asks to plan, make a spec, triage, research a task, write a report, code review, summarize findings, save the work, document decisions, record this, write that down, persist findings, or references any path under .aiwork/. Also use when starting a non-trivial task that needs a plan or spec before implementation, or when finishing one and capturing notes.
| name | tech-spec-review |
| description | Review a technical specification for gaps, confusing explanations, and contradictory specifications. Use when user asks to review, critique, or audit a tech spec, design doc, PRD, or RFC for high-level clarity and consistency. Does not suggest implementation details. |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
Review this design doc.
Identify gaps in the design, confusing explanations, or contradictory specifications. Avoid suggestions about implementation details, and focus on high-level design and clarity.
Cite specific quotes and section headings. Do not rely on line numbers, as they're likely to change during editing.
