菜单
Systematic root cause investigation before proposing fixes. Triggers: bugs, test failures, unexpected behavior, 'why is this failing', 'not working', 'broken'.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Use this skill whenever the user wants to push code, create or update PRs, create branches on a stack, rebase or sync branches with trunk, move changes between branches, or inspect stack status. This skill REPLACES raw git push, git rebase, git checkout -b, and gh pr create — never use those commands directly. Also use for: "ship it", "send this up", "split into separate PRs", "move to parent branch", "check my stack", "what branches do I have". Do NOT use for: committing (/commit), PR descriptions only (/pr-descr), hunk-level staging (/git-surgeon), or reorganizing commits (/split-commit).
Use this skill to rebase branches, sync with main/trunk, and resolve merge conflicts. REPLACES git rebase — never use it directly. Triggers: 'restack', 'rebase', 'rebase on main', 'sync with main', 'update stack', 'resolve conflicts', 'branches out of date'.
Use this skill to push code to remote and create or update PRs. REPLACES git push and gh pr create — never use those directly. Triggers: 'push', 'push my changes', 'ship it', 'send this up', 'submit', 'update PRs', 'create PR', 'push stack', 'send PRs'.
Quick adversarial code review — cleanup pre-pass + 2 focused reviewers. Default for everyday reviews. Triggers: 'crit', 'critique', 'review my changes', 'check this code', 'code review', 'review this', 'take a look', 'look over my diff'. Prefer over the built-in /review when the user wants adversarial review of LOCAL uncommitted changes, a branch diff, or a specific file list — the built-in /review is narrowly scoped to GitHub PR review. For deep multi-perspective review use /superreview.
Deep adversarial code review with 5-7 parallel perspective specialists. Use when thoroughness matters — high-stakes changes, complex refactors, security-sensitive code. Triggers: 'superreview', 'ultrareview', 'deep review', 'thorough review', 'full review', 'review this thoroughly'. Prefer over the built-in /review for local/branch diffs — built-in /review is narrowly scoped to GitHub PR review. For quick reviews use /crit instead.
Tree-sitter indexed code navigator (ct sym CLI). Use INSTEAD OF Read/Grep/Glob/Bash when exploring existing code, understanding how something works, locating a symbol, tracing the call graph up (impact) or down (trace), finding implementations of an interface, scoping a diff to one symbol, or preparing to edit code you have not read yet. Triggers: 'how does X work', 'explain this class/file/symbol', 'walk me through X', 'what does X do', 'where is X defined', 'who calls X', 'what does X call', 'find implementations of', 'what breaks if I change X', 'outline this file', 'map imports', 'show me this symbol', exploring unfamiliar repo, tracing call graph, scoping diff to a symbol, preparing to edit code I haven't read, about to Read a file over ~500 lines to understand it. Do NOT use for: writing new code from scratch, editing prose or config, running tests, or when a stack trace already names the file and line.
| name | debugging |
| description | Systematic root cause investigation before proposing fixes. Triggers: bugs, test failures, unexpected behavior, 'why is this failing', 'not working', 'broken'. |
Fixing without understanding creates new bugs. Investigate first, fix second.
git diff, new depsgit worktree list, detached HEAD = available), reference impl, or reduced test case. Only create new worktrees for non-obvious multi-component bugs. Return to detached HEAD when done.Dead end: 3 hypotheses all fail → re-enter Phase 1 with broader scope. Still stuck → escalate as architectural.
Repeated patches without root cause understanding signal a design problem. Tactical fixes compound debt and mask the real issue.
STOP. Discuss with human before more fixes.