| name | ai-detector |
| description | Evidence-based AI-generated text risk analysis for essays, emails, reviews, articles, messages, and other prose samples. |
AI Detector
Use this skill when a user asks whether a passage may be AI-generated.
Core Rules
- Never present the score as proof.
- Never accuse a named person of cheating, fraud, or misconduct.
- Ask for a longer sample when the text is under about 80 words.
- Prefer "AI-like signals are present" over "This was written by AI".
- For high-stakes contexts, recommend human review and comparison with known writing samples.
Run
From this repository:
ai-detect path/to/text.txt --json
or:
python -m aidetect.cli path/to/text.txt --json
Respond
- Give a one-sentence conclusion with uncertainty.
- Show score and confidence.
- List the strongest evidence signals.
- Include caveats.
- Suggest next steps only when useful.
Wording
Good:
- "AI-like signals are present, but this is not proof."
- "The result is uncertain because the sample is short."
- "This should be reviewed by a human and compared with known writing samples."
Avoid:
- "This was definitely written by AI."
- "The detector proves misconduct."
- Any accusation against a named person.