lythoskill-red-green-release

name	lythoskill-red-green-release
version	{"[object Object]":null}
description	User-acceptance-driven release workflow using heredoc patch files. Each iteration produces a timestamped pr-<timestamp>-<desc>.sh that self-archives after execution. No tag without explicit user LGTM. Supports rollback via archived backups.
when_to_use	LGTM, ship it, looks good, tag it, rollback, broke it, create patch, apply changes, version release, 对了, 就是这样, 我觉得ok, 可以打tag, 改坏了, 回滚, 打tag, repomix, web chat, no git access, remote agent, apply patch manually.

Red-Green Release Workflow

No tag without LGTM. Every change is a self-archiving patch. Every state is rollback-able.

Typical Scenarios

This skill shines when the agent does not have direct filesystem or git access to the user's project. Typical setups:

• Web chat + Repomix: User pastes a Repomix dump of their codebase into a web chat. The agent proposes changes as pr-*.sh heredoc patches. The user copies the patch locally and runs bash pr-*.sh.
• Distributed / async review: Patches are posted in issues, emailed, or shared via web UI for a human to review and apply manually.
• No git on target: Environments (e.g., bare-metal servers, deployed configs) where git revert is unavailable — .bak files provide rollback.

In these scenarios the agent cannot git commit, git diff, or write files directly. The heredoc patch is the only viable delivery format.

Core Principles

1. User acceptance drives releases — "LGTM" / "对了" / "就是这样" → then and only then commit + tag.
2. Atomic patches — Each iteration = one pr-<timestamp>-<desc>.sh with heredoc content replacement.
3. Self-archiving — Patch copies itself to archived-patches/ and deletes itself after execution.
4. Rollback-ready — Every patch backs up originals before modifying. Rollback = restore backup.

Workflow (4 Phases)

Phase 1 — Plan: Understand requirement, describe approach, user confirms design. Phase 2 — Create Patch (dry-run): Write pr-<timestamp>-<desc>.sh containing backup + heredoc replacement + self-archive logic. Show to user for review. User says "apply it" → proceed. Phase 3 — Apply & Test: Execute patch (bash pr-*.sh). Restart service. User tests. If issues → back to Phase 2 with a new patch. Iterate until green. Phase 4 — Accept & Tag: User says LGTM →

git add -A
git commit -m "<summary>"
git tag -a <tag> -m "<summary>"

Patch File Format

Naming

pr-<timestamp>-<description>.sh

Forbidden words in description: final, done, fix, ok. These words encourage skipping the red-green test cycle by implying pre-verified success.

Template

#!/bin/bash
# PR: <timestamp>-<description>
# 1. Create archive directory
mkdir -p archived-patches
# 2. Backup current files (for rollback)
cp src/target.ts "archived-patches/target.ts.$(date +%Y%m%d).bak"
# 3. Apply changes (declarative full-file replacement via heredoc)
cat > src/target.ts << 'PATCH_EOF'
// Full replacement content here — exact file state after patch
PATCH_EOF
# 4. Self-archive: copy patch to archive, then delete from root
cp "$0" "archived-patches/$(basename "$0")"
rm "$0"

⚠️ Heredoc delimiter (PATCH_EOF) must be quoted in the cat command to prevent variable expansion. See references/archive-format.md for multi-file patches and escaping rules.

Supporting References

Read these only when the specific topic arises:

When you need to…	Read
See complete heredoc syntax, multi-file patches, and escaping rules	references/archive-format.md
Understand the 4-phase workflow in detail	references/phase-details.md
See conversation examples of red-green iterations	references/conversation-examples.md