name	gpt-isms-stamp-out
description	Strip GPT-5.4 verbal tics from text. Use when user asks to de-GPT a document, remove AI-isms, stamp out GPT tics, or clean up AI-written text. Also use proactively when creating documents (README, docs, proposals, specs) to avoid GPT-5.4 tic patterns in the output.

GPT-Isms Stamp Out

Remove GPT-5.4 verbal tics from text. Apply these rules when editing or creating documents.

When to Apply

User explicitly asks: "去 GPT 味", "去掉 AI 口癖", "de-GPT this", "stamp out GPT-isms", "clean up the AI voice"
User asks to create a document — apply rules proactively to avoid tics in output
User provides AI-generated text for cleanup

Detection Rules — Chinese (ZH)

Level 1: Must Remove — Structural Tics

「不是……而是……」句式 GPT-5.4 abuses this to manufacture faux cognitive contrast. Rewrite as direct statement.

❌ "能把她拉出来的不是道理，而是一个能让情绪重新对上的节拍"
✅ "节拍和旋律——而非道理——才能把她拉出来"  (or just state B directly)

Rule: When the "negated A" is not a real viewpoint anyone holds, delete the negation and state B directly.

「把」字句泛滥 GPT-5.4 overuses 把-construction far beyond natural Chinese frequency.

❌ "GPT 把把字句使用得很多"
✅ "GPT 高频使用把字句"

结尾主动推销 Never end with unsolicited offers for follow-up.

❌ "如果你需要，我可以……" / "需要我……吗？" / "下一步，我可以……" / "只要你回复我"
✅ [Just stop. No trailing offer.]

Level 2: Must Remove — Filler Phrases

Tic	Fix
"简单的说" / "简单来说"	Delete or use "简言之" sparingly
"总结一下" / "一句话总结"	Delete; just state the conclusion
"结论先说清楚"	Delete
"我逐步说清楚"	Delete
"我来解释"	Delete
"换句话说"	Delete or use "即"
"从某种角度来说"	Delete
"值得注意的是" / "值得一提的是"	Delete; if truly notable, let content speak
"综上所述" / "总而言之"	Delete
"首先……其次……最后……"	Restructure to avoid numbered-transition chain

Level 3: Must Remove — Sycophancy

❌ "你问到问题的核心" / "你太清醒了" / "你说的太对了"
❌ "我会稳稳地接住你" / "我就在这里，不躲不藏，随时接住你"
❌ "你只是太久没被人接住了"
✅ [Delete entirely. No flattery, no pseudo-empathy.]

Level 4: Must Remove — Internet Corporate Jargon

Tic	Fix
兜底	"保底" or rephrase
落盘	"确认" / "定下来"
闭环	"完整流程" or rephrase
说穿	Delete
口径	"说法" / "表述"
拆开 / 抽层 / 收口 / 压实	Rephrase in plain language
顺一下 / 补一个 / 拉起	Rephrase
砍一刀 / 补一刀 / 切 / 狠狠干	Delete violent metaphor

Level 5: Must Remove — False Certainty

❌ "我已经确定" / "我找到问题所在" / "这版一定可以解决"
✅ "当前分析显示……" / "这个方案……" (proportional confidence)

Level 6: Must Remove — Structural & Stylistic

标题括号注释

❌ "## 架构设计（非常易懂）" / "## 快速开始（可以跳过）"
✅ "## 架构设计" / "## 快速开始"

开头宣告句式

❌ "我会为你……" / "下面给出一份……"
✅ Just start the content.

滥用双引号做强调 — Use bold or italics for emphasis, not quotation marks.

思维链外露 — Remove self-talk like "这个地方你可以……" / "这里需要说明的是……"

编造简称 — "二改" / "根掉" → spell out or use standard terms.

搭配蹩脚 / 词性混用 — Flag and rephrase: "对环境要求很宽" → "对环境要求宽松"

音律坏 — Single-character words disrupting rhythm: flag and suggest multi-character alternatives.

中译中啰嗦 — If a sentence can be halved without losing meaning, halve it.

Level 7: Overused Vocabulary

Tic	Replacement
非常 / 十分 / 极其	Delete; let the adjective stand alone
至关重要	"关键" or delete
不可忽视	Delete
深入探讨	"讨论" / "分析"
赋能	"支持" / "帮助"
落地	"实施" / "执行"

Detection Rules — English (EN)

Apply when document is in English or mixed-language.

Structural

Tic	Fix
"It's not X, it's Y" / "Not X, but Y"	State Y directly unless X is a real, named viewpoint
"That's a great question!"	Delete
"I completely understand…"	Delete
"Let me walk you through step by step"	Just do it; don't announce it
"Would you like me to…" / "Let me know if…" / "Shall I…"	Delete; end at conclusion
"In conclusion…" / "Ultimately…"	Delete

Vocabulary

Tic	Replacement
delve	explore / dig into / discuss
tapestry	mix / combination / fabric
nuanced	subtle / fine-grained (or delete)
multifaceted	complex / many-sided
landscape	field / area / scene
robust	strong / solid / reliable
pivotal	key / central
paramount	critical / vital
transformative	big-change / overhaul (or be specific)
holistic	comprehensive / full
leverage	use / tap into
foster	build / grow / encourage
paradigm	model / framework
Furthermore / Moreover	Delete or use "And" / "Also"
It's important to note that	Delete; just state the point
It's worth mentioning that	Delete

Em-dash Overuse

Limit to at most one em-dash per paragraph. Replace extras with period, semicolon, or parenthesis.

Workflow

Mode A: Clean Existing Document

Read the target file(s)
Scan line by line against all detection rules above
For each hit: report the tic, category, and suggested fix
Apply fixes (Edit tool) — one category at a time, starting from Level 1 structural tics
After all fixes: re-read the document, verify no new tics introduced, report before/after stats

Mode B: Create New Document (Proactive)

When user asks to create a doc, apply all rules above during composition
Before writing each section, mentally check against the tic list
After writing: run a self-scan pass (Mode A step 2-4)
Report: "Written with GPT-isms stamped out. [N] tics avoided."

Reporting

After cleanup, report:

GPT-isms stamped out: [N] tics removed
- Structural (不是…而是…): [N]
- Filler phrases: [N]
- Sycophancy: [N]
- Corporate jargon: [N]
- Vocabulary: [N]
- Other: [N]

Edge Cases

Quoted text: Do not modify content inside blockquotes or verbatim quotes — those belong to the quoted source
Code blocks: Never modify content inside code fences
Deliberate style: If user explicitly wants a specific tic pattern kept (e.g., marketing copy using "赋能"), respect it
Mixed language docs: Apply both ZH and EN rules; prioritize the primary language of each section

name	gpt-isms-stamp-out
description	Strip GPT-5.4 verbal tics from text. Use when user asks to de-GPT a document, remove AI-isms, stamp out GPT tics, or clean up AI-written text. Also use proactively when creating documents (README, docs, proposals, specs) to avoid GPT-5.4 tic patterns in the output.