| name | security-questionnaire |
| description | Use when the user needs governed questionnaire answers, customer assurance drafts, or evidence-backed responses for security, privacy, retention, subprocessors, or AI governance. |
| metadata | {"created_by":"meridian_product","session_key":"web_api:trust-ops","category":"assurance"} |
Security Questionnaire
Use this skill when the user asks for:
- security questionnaire help
- customer assurance drafts
- trust center or due diligence responses
- AI governance answer packs
Workflow
- Separate approved evidence from draft answers and open gaps.
- Route the work through these preferred specialists: ATLAS, QUILL, AEGIS.
- Reuse governed trust evidence first, then gather missing support.
- Draft only the answers that can be supported truthfully in the current execution context.
- Escalate missing proof instead of inventing it.
Reachable Capability Hints
- Atlas should retrieve the strongest available evidence and missing-proof signals.
- Quill should draft buyer-facing answers that stay bounded to the evidence.
- Aegis should reject unsupported certifications, retention promises, privacy promises, or subprocessor claims.
Guardrails
- Do not claim SOC 2, ISO 27001, retention timelines, subprocessors, privacy guarantees, or AI governance controls without proof.
- Do not hide open gaps; unresolved questions must stay visible.
- Do not present a draft answer pack as fully approved unless the evidence is actually approved.