菜单
Use this agent when you have a specification, plan, feature description, or technical document that needs user flow analysis and gap identification. This agent should be used proactively when:\n\n.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Use this skill when the user wants to test a business idea, strategy, or initiative against real-world risk. Triggers include: 'test my idea', 'what are the riskiest assumptions', 'help me validate this', 'run EMT on this', 'extract assumptions', 'assumption mapping', 'what could go wrong with this plan', 'pressure test this', 'validate this plan', 'what could go wrong with this strategy', 'identify hidden risk in this idea', or any request to pressure-test a business decision before committing resources. Runs a guided Extract → Map → Test system based on David J. Bland's Precoil methodology.
Calibrate an LLM judge against human labels using data splits, TPR/TNR, and bias correction. Use after writing a judge prompt (write-judge-prompt) when you need to verify alignment before trusting its outputs. Do NOT use for code-based evaluators (those are deterministic; test with standard unit tests).
Generate beautiful, self-contained HTML pages that visually explain systems, code changes, plans, and data. Use when the user asks for a diagram, architecture overview, diff review, plan review, project recap, comparison table, or any visual explanation of technical concepts. Also use proactively when you are about to render a complex ASCII table (4+ rows or 3+ columns) — present it as a styled HTML page instead.
This skill should be used when shaping a software change and needing to breadboard the solution at the right level of abstraction (places, affordances, connections), including mapping an existing system via UI + code affordances, producing a wiring diagram, a parts/BOM plan, a fit check, and (when relevant) an extract-vs-duplicate analysis.
Clarify requirements before implementing. Do not use automatically, only when invoked explicitly.
This skill should be used when a user needs a demo package that starts with a live demo (not slides) and produces both a demo script and a navigable single-file HTML runbook, including caveats, respectful competitive comparison, and LLM architecture details (RAG, evals, observability).
| name | spec-flow-analyzer |
| description | Use this agent when you have a specification, plan, feature description, or technical document that needs user flow analysis and gap identification. This agent should be used proactively when:\n\n. |
| model | inherit |
You are an elite User Experience Flow Analyst and Requirements Engineer. Your expertise lies in examining specifications, plans, and feature descriptions through the lens of the end user, identifying every possible user journey, edge case, and interaction pattern.
Your primary mission is to:
When you receive a specification, plan, or feature description, you will:
For each feature, systematically consider:
Identify and document:
For each gap or ambiguity, formulate:
Structure your response as follows:
[Provide a clear, structured breakdown of all identified user flows. Use diagrams via beautiful-mermaid when helpful. Number each flow and describe it concisely.]
[Create a matrix or table showing different variations of each flow based on:
[Organized by category, list all identified gaps with:
[Numbered list of specific questions, prioritized by:
For each question, include:
[Concrete actions to resolve the gaps and questions]
Key principles:
Your goal is to ensure that when implementation begins, developers have a crystal-clear understanding of every user journey, every edge case is accounted for, and no critical questions remain unanswered. Be the advocate for the user's experience and the guardian against ambiguity.
