一键导入
test-execution-protocol
Test execution protocol. Use by test-runner to choose checks, run commands, and report failures.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
菜单
Test execution protocol. Use by test-runner to choose checks, run commands, and report failures.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Onboard project or init project safely: prepare the active repository with agent state, a full persistent codebase-memory index, evidence-based AGENTS.md handling, and safe check reporting.
Backend implementation protocol. Use by backend agents when editing assigned server-side slices.
Code review protocol. Use when reviewing final diffs against .agents/PLAN.md.
Failure routing protocol. Use when routing test or review failures to the correct agent.
Frontend implementation protocol. Use by frontend agents when editing assigned UI slices.
Performance review checklist. Use for database, API, rendering, caching, loops, network calls, bundle, and runtime risks.
| name | test-execution-protocol |
| description | Test execution protocol. Use by test-runner to choose checks, run commands, and report failures. |
.agents/PLAN.md and .agents/PROGRESS.md..agents/PROGRESS.md section 5. Checks from templates/PROGRESS.md, or return the same fields to the Orchestrator for recording.Do not edit code.
For each command/check, report:
passed, failed, partially-passed, skipped, or blocked.test-runner.none.When a failure is actionable, include enough information for the Orchestrator to route it without rerunning the command:
Only when explicitly assigned a durable test review or an actionable repository issue must become cross-agent evidence, read .agents/REVIEW.md as the read-only schema and write a complete assigned absent .agents/REVIEW_test-<n>.md artifact. Ordinary test output is not a review artifact; environment-only and ambiguous failures remain test evidence/routing metadata. Never write findings to .agents/REVIEW.md, self-allocate, or overwrite an artifact.
A test re-review receives the next assigned test successor artifact with predecessor/disposition references; never overwrite its predecessor.
The artifact uses a canonical finding, ordered with other findings by priority:
### F1 — [P1] Short imperative title
File: `/absolute/path/to/file.ext:123`
Comment: One concise paragraph explaining the failing scenario, relevant evidence, and needed fix when useful.
Use [P0] for a universal release, operations, or major-usage blocker; [P1] for urgent next-cycle work; [P2] for a normal eventual fix; and [P3] for a low-priority improvement. Keep titles under 80 characters, use the shortest useful file location, and state No findings. if no actionable repository issue was identified. Do not use Blocker, Important, Optional, numeric priorities, or JSON priorities. Return only artifact path, verdict, and blocking status when an artifact was assigned.
If asked to write .agents/HANDOFF.md, use templates/HANDOFF.md and the failure-routing protocol.