菜单
Break a plan, spec, or the current conversation into a set of tracer-bullet tickets, each declaring its blocking edges, published per the tracker conventions — ticket files with blocked-by edges, or native blocking links on a real tracker.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Work a feature's ticket DAG in parallel — one orchestrator fans independent frontier tickets out to parallel worker agents and integrates them on the feature branch until the feature ships. Use when a ticketed feature has independent frontier tickets, the user says "dispatch" or wants tickets worked in parallel, or when another skill routes parallel frontier work here.
Which mx skill or flow fits the current situation — a router over the mx workflow.
Run commands in tmux whenever they run long or need eyes on them — anything expected to take more than ~30–60s (training runs, ML experiments, builds, servers), anything worth observing mid-run (progress logs, monitoring output), and anything interactive (sudo prompts, REPLs, wizards), locally or on a remote host. Always reach for this instead of a fire-and-forget Bash call in those cases — the human can attach and step in at any time.
Review and update Claude Code's auto-approved command allowlist based on Bash commands that triggered permission prompts in recent sessions.
Turn the current conversation into a spec and publish it to the project issue tracker — no interview, just synthesis of what you've already discussed.
File-based issue tracker conventions — how specs, tickets, and small tasks live in agent/tasks/ and how to publish, fetch, claim, and retire them. Use when publishing or fetching a spec/ticket/task, picking work from the frontier, or when another skill says "publish to the issue tracker".
| name | to-tickets |
| description | Break a plan, spec, or the current conversation into a set of tracer-bullet tickets, each declaring its blocking edges, published per the tracker conventions — ticket files with blocked-by edges, or native blocking links on a real tracker. |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
Break a plan, spec, or conversation into a set of tickets — tracer-bullet vertical slices, each declaring the tickets that block it.
Publish per the tracker skill's conventions (or the tracker the project's CLAUDE.md declares).
Work from whatever is already in the conversation context. If the user passes a reference (a spec path, an issue number or URL) as an argument, fetch it and read its full body and comments.
If you have not already explored the codebase, do so to understand the current state of the code. Ticket titles and descriptions should use the vocabulary from CONTEXT.md, and respect ADRs in decisions/ in the area you're touching.
Look for opportunities to prefactor the code to make the implementation easier. "Make the change easy, then make the easy change."
Break the work into tracer bullet tickets.
Give each ticket its blocking edges — the other tickets that must complete before it can start. A ticket with no blockers can start immediately.
Only ticket what you can specify precisely now. If part of the work is still too foggy to state as a slice, leave it in the spec's Further Notes and ticket it when the frontier reaches it.
Wide refactors are the exception to vertical slicing. A wide refactor is one mechanical change — rename a column, retype a shared symbol — whose blast radius fans across the whole codebase, so a single edit breaks thousands of call sites at once and no vertical slice can land green. Don't force it into a tracer bullet; sequence it as expand–contract. First expand: add the new form beside the old so nothing breaks. Then migrate the call sites over in batches sized by blast radius (per package, per directory), each batch its own ticket blocked by the expand, keeping CI green batch to batch because the old form still exists. Finally contract: delete the old form once no caller remains, in a ticket blocked by every migrate batch. When even the batches can't stay green alone, keep the sequence but let them share an integration branch that all block a final integrate-and-verify ticket — green is promised only there.
Present the proposed breakdown as a numbered list. For each ticket, show:
Ask the user:
Iterate until the user approves the breakdown.
Publish per the tracker skill: one NN-<slug>.md per ticket in the feature's directory, numbered in dependency order (blockers first), each using the template below. Do NOT modify the spec.
(On a repo whose CLAUDE.md declares a real tracker like GitHub Issues, publish one issue per ticket instead, using the platform's native blocking / sub-issue relationships.)
The end-to-end behaviour this ticket makes work, from the user's perspective — not layer-by-layer implementation.
Avoid specific file paths or code snippets — they go stale fast. Exception: if a prototype produced a snippet that encodes a decision more precisely than prose can (state machine, reducer, schema, type shape), inline it and note briefly that it came from a prototype. Trim to the decision-rich parts — not a working demo, just the important bits.
Work the frontier one ticket at a time with /mx:implement, clearing context between tickets. Independent frontier tickets can run in parallel via /mx:dispatch.
