| name | defining-cohort-phenotypes |
| description | Authors computable phenotype and cohort definitions in the OHDSI ATLAS / CIRCE style over the OMOP CDM, combining standard concept sets with NLP-derived features that OpenMed extracts. Use when the user wants to define a patient cohort, write a computable phenotype, reuse PheKB or OHDSI Phenotype Library logic, build concept sets, or augment code-based criteria with text features. Trigger keywords: phenotype, cohort definition, OHDSI, ATLAS, CIRCE, OMOP CDM, concept set, PheKB, Phenotype Library, eMERGE, computable phenotype. Pairs adjacent to OpenMed: NLP features from openmed.analyze_text augment code-based phenotypes for entities that are poorly captured by structured codes. OMOP CDM and OHDSI tools are open source; restricted vocabularies (SNOMED, CPT) are user-supplied. |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| metadata | {"project":"OpenMed","category":"research-genomics","pairs":"adjacent","version":"1.0"} |
Defining cohort phenotypes (OHDSI / OMOP CDM)
A computable phenotype is a portable, executable definition of "which patients
have condition X" — concept sets plus inclusion logic that runs against any
OMOP CDM-compliant database. In the OHDSI stack, ATLAS authors these visually,
CIRCE serializes them to a standardized JSON representation, and that JSON
compiles to database-specific SQL. This skill helps you author such definitions
and augment them with NLP features that OpenMed extracts from clinical text —
exactly the signals that structured codes miss.
OMOP CDM, ATLAS, CIRCE, and the OHDSI Phenotype Library are open source. The
vocabulary content you reference (SNOMED CT, CPT4, ICD) is user-supplied —
do not bundle restricted terminologies; load them into your own OMOP vocabulary
tables with your own licenses.
When to use
- You need a reproducible cohort definition for analytics or research.
- You want to reuse an existing PheKB or OHDSI Phenotype Library definition
and adapt it.
- A phenotype depends on facts that live only in free text (e.g. smoking
status, symptom severity, social context) and code-based logic alone is weak.
For terminology grounding of individual entities, see coding-icd10,
normalizing-rxnorm, mapping-loinc; this skill is about composing them into a
cohort.
Anatomy of a CIRCE cohort definition
A CIRCE cohort definition JSON has two parts: ConceptSets (the code lists) and
an expression (entry event + inclusion rules). Shape (abridged):
{
"ConceptSets": [{
"id": 0, "name": "Type 2 diabetes",
"expression": { "items": [{
"concept": { "CONCEPT_ID": 201826,
"CONCEPT_CODE": "44054006",
"VOCABULARY_ID": "SNOMED" },
"includeDescendants": true
}] }
}],
"PrimaryCriteria": {
"CriteriaList": [{ "ConditionOccurrence": { "CodesetId": 0 } }],
"ObservationWindow": { "PriorDays": 0, "PostDays": 0 },
"PrimaryCriteriaLimit": { "Type": "First" }
},
"InclusionRules": [{
"name": "Adult at index",
"expression": { "Type": "ALL", "CriteriaList": [{
"Criteria": { "ConditionEra": { "AgeAtStart": { "Value": 18, "Op": "gte" } } }
}] }
}]
}
You author this in ATLAS (recommended) or by hand. The OHDSI Phenotype Library
ships hundreds of vetted definitions as exactly this JSON; reuse before you write.
Augmenting with OpenMed NLP features
Code-based phenotypes are blind to facts that only appear in notes. The pattern is
materialize an NLP feature as OMOP rows, then reference it like any concept set.
import openmed
note = "Patient is a current smoker, ~1 pack/day, with worsening dyspnea."
res = openmed.analyze_text(note, model_name="disease_detection_superclinical",
output_format="dict")
This mirrors how eMERGE and PheKB phenotypes mix structured codes with NLP:
the NLP step contributes high-recall flags for concepts that ICD/CPT capture
poorly, and CIRCE composes them with the rest of the logic.
Workflow
- Start from a library definition if one exists (OHDSI Phenotype Library /
PheKB) and adapt; otherwise design entry event + inclusion rules.
- Build concept sets from standard OMOP concepts; set
includeDescendants
to capture hierarchies. Vocabulary content comes from your own licensed tables.
- Identify text-only criteria the codes miss; extract them with
openmed.analyze_text and materialize as OMOP rows / cohort attributes.
- Assemble the CIRCE JSON (concept sets + expression) — in ATLAS or directly.
- Validate against OMOP CDM: generate SQL, run on a (synthetic/de-identified)
database, review cohort counts; iterate with PheValuator-style checks.
- Document human-readable logic alongside the JSON for portability.
Hand-off to / from OpenMed
- OpenMed → phenotype features.
openmed.analyze_text over notes yields
Disease, Pharmaceutical, Genomics, Oncology, and social/behavioral spans. Ground
each to a standard concept (coding-icd10, normalizing-rxnorm, mapping-loinc,
or your SNOMED map) and write it into OMOP so CIRCE can reference it.
- Phenotype → OpenMed scope. A cohort definition tells you which notes to
process: run OpenMed only on the cohort's documents to extract the features the
phenotype needs, keeping compute and PHI exposure minimal.
- Run locally on de-identified or synthetic OMOP data. De-identify notes with
openmed.deidentify before they enter any shared analytics environment.
Edge cases & gotchas
- Standard vs source concepts. OMOP maps source codes (ICD-10-CM) to standard
concepts (usually SNOMED). Build concept sets on standard concepts and let
the source-to-standard map do the translation, or you will miss rows.
- Descendants matter. Forgetting
includeDescendants silently drops the
hierarchy (e.g. all diabetes subtypes). Forgetting nothing can over-capture —
review the resolved concept list.
- NLP feature provenance. Tag NLP-derived OMOP rows distinctly (e.g. a
type_concept indicating "derived from NLP") so analysts know the signal is
probabilistic, not adjudicated.
- Vocabulary licensing. SNOMED CT, CPT4, and similar require their own
licenses and are not redistributed here — load them into your OMOP vocab.
- Portability ≠ equivalence. The same JSON runs everywhere, but data capture
differs by site; validate cohort counts per source before trusting them.
- Not clinical advice. Phenotype membership supports research/analytics; it is
not a diagnosis.
Standards & references