菜单
Review branch changes vs main using a merge-base diff and return prioritized findings, risks, and cleanup opportunities. Use when asked to review changes against main/origin/main.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
| name | review-main |
| description | Review branch changes vs main using a merge-base diff and return prioritized findings, risks, and cleanup opportunities. Use when asked to review changes against main/origin/main. |
base=$(git merge-base HEAD origin/main).git diff $base (limit to focus paths if provided).Use when designing or repairing a CoGames-style game and the main risk is that the rules, map, roles, or play loop do not yet match the real game or prompt closely enough.
Use when creating a new mettagrid game from scratch and you need the design-first workflow that writes the rules contract, checks engine fit, and hands a clean build plan to `cg.game.build-game`.
Use when a CoGames-style game already works visually and mechanically and now needs to be split into a composable variant registry, dependency tree, and optional curriculum tree without regressing the default game.
Use when implementing or overhauling a CoGames-style game once the target contract is known, including scaffold, registration, mechanics, assets, and variant factoring.
Use when designing or repairing a CoGames-style game and the main risk is that the rules, map, roles, or play loop do not yet match the real game or prompt closely enough.
Use when a CoGames-style game is mechanically working but still has missing, placeholder, wrongly themed, or non-namespaced art, terrain, or atlas entries.