一键导入
stress-testing-specs
Use when stress-testing design specs. Devil's advocate for assumptions, unknowns, scope.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
菜单
Use when stress-testing design specs. Devil's advocate for assumptions, unknowns, scope.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
| name | stress-testing-specs |
| description | Use when stress-testing design specs. Devil's advocate for assumptions, unknowns, scope. |
∀ complex specs after initial draft. Optional for standard.
¬approve spec until stress-tested. ∀ assumption: challenge explicitly.
## Spec Challenge — [Slice]
### Verdict: APPROVE | REVISE
### Critical Issues (blocks planning)
| # | Section | Issue | Risk |
### Concerns (note in spec, proceed)
| # | Section | Concern | Suggestion |
### Assumptions Verified
- [assumption] — [why holds]
Use when making git commits. Conventional commit format and rules.
Use when running security review on a diff/PR/file. Research-vs-Reporting discipline, three-tier confidence gate, attacker-controllable taxonomy.
Use when invoking plannotator for approval review of generated .tff-cc milestone artifacts (plan, verification, spec).
Use when starting design or discovery work. MUST use before any creative work.
Use when the user wants to report a bug, file an issue, or send feedback about tff-cc. Triggers on phrases like 'report issue', 'file a bug', 'tff-cc broke', 'something is wrong with tff-cc', 'open an issue', '/report-issue'.
Use when creating, refining, or composing skills. Evidence-driven pattern analysis.