菜单
Use when implementation is complete and all tests pass -- guides verification, integration options, and cleanup
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Use when reviewing a spec or task graph for completeness before implementation
Use when the user needs to interact with websites, including navigating pages, filling forms, clicking buttons, taking screenshots, extracting data, testing web apps, logging in, or automating browser actions
Use when the user needs to interact with websites, including navigating pages, filling forms, clicking buttons, taking screenshots, extracting data, testing web apps, logging in, or automating browser actions
Use when decomposing a spec, design, or feature description into a task dependency graph with self-evaluating acceptance criteria
Use when doing creative product, feature, component, functionality, or behavior design work
Use when infrastructure or features are built but before declaring done -- verifies work is wired into the system and actively used
| name | finishing-work |
| description | Use when implementation is complete and all tests pass -- guides verification, integration options, and cleanup |
Verify tests, detect the workspace, present integration options, execute the choice, clean up, then land the plane.
Core principle: Verify tests → Detect workspace → Present options → Execute → Clean up → Land.
Before presenting options, verify tests pass:
# Go
go test ./...
# Python
uv run pytest
If tests fail: fix first. Don't proceed to Step 2.
Before showing a menu, figure out what kind of workspace you're in. oro is worktree-heavy and workers run in detached or externally-managed workspaces, so the menu and cleanup depend on this.
GIT_DIR=$(git -C "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)" rev-parse --git-dir)
GIT_COMMON=$(git -C "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)" rev-parse --git-common-dir)
Compare the two (resolve to absolute paths before comparing):
| State | Menu | Cleanup |
|---|---|---|
GIT_DIR == GIT_COMMON (normal repo) | Standard 4 options | No worktree to clean up |
GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON, on a named branch | Standard 4 options | Provenance-based (Step 5) |
GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON, detached HEAD | Reduced 3 options (no local merge) | None — externally managed |
A detached HEAD in a worktree means the workspace is externally managed (a harness/worker checkout, not a branch you own). Don't offer a local merge and don't remove it.
Normal repo or named-branch worktree — present exactly these 4 options:
Implementation complete. What would you like to do?
1. Merge back to <base-branch> locally
2. Push and create a Pull Request
3. Keep the branch as-is (I'll handle it later)
4. Discard this work
Which option?
Detached HEAD (externally-managed workspace) — present exactly these 3 options:
Implementation complete. You're on a detached HEAD (externally managed workspace).
1. Push as a new branch and create a Pull Request
2. Keep as-is (I'll handle it later)
3. Discard this work
Which option?
Keep options concise — no extra explanation.
Option 1 — Merge Locally:
git checkout <base-branch>
git pull
git merge <feature-branch>
# Verify tests on merged result BEFORE removing anything
Only after the merge succeeds and tests pass: clean up the worktree (Step 5), then delete the branch:
git branch -d <feature-branch>
Order matters — remove the worktree before git branch -d, or the delete fails because the worktree still references the branch.
Option 2 — Push and Create PR:
git push -u origin <feature-branch>
Detect the remote host before assuming a tool — oro projects are not always on GitHub:
REMOTE_URL=$(git remote get-url origin)
github.com → gh pr create --title "<title>" --body "<body>"gitlab.* → glab mr create --title "<title>" --description "<body>"git push, or ask the userGitHub body template:
gh pr create --title "<title>" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Summary
<2-3 bullets>
## Test Plan
- [ ] <verification steps>
EOF
)"
Do NOT clean up the worktree — the user needs it alive to iterate on PR feedback.
Option 3 — Keep As-Is: Report: "Keeping branch . Worktree preserved at ." Don't clean up the worktree.
Option 4 — Discard:
Confirm first — show what will be deleted (branch, commit list, worktree path) and require a typed discard before doing anything. Then clean up the worktree (Step 5) and force-delete the branch:
git branch -D <feature-branch>
Only runs for Options 1 and 4. Options 2 and 3 always preserve the worktree.
Decide ownership by provenance — only remove worktrees oro created under .worktrees/ (or worktrees/):
GIT_DIR == GIT_COMMON (normal repo): nothing to remove. Done..worktrees/ / worktrees/: oro owns it — remove it..worktrees/): leave it in place. If your platform provides a workspace-exit tool, use it; otherwise do nothing.Removing an oro-owned worktree — follow oro's mandatory sequence (see using-git-worktrees, "Worktree Removal (CRITICAL)"):
Removing a worktree while the shell cwd is inside it permanently kills the Bash tool (Codex bug #9190) — recovery requires a session restart. The worktree_guard.py PreToolUse hook will block dangerous removals, but don't rely on it. Follow the sequence exactly:
# 1. ALWAYS cd to the MAIN repo root FIRST (never chain this with removal)
cd "$(git -C "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)/.." rev-parse --show-toplevel)"
# 2. THEN remove the worktree (its own command — never chained with && or ;)
git worktree remove <worktree-path>
# 3. Prune stale registrations, then verify bash still works
git worktree prune
echo "bash ok"
Rules (consistent with using-git-worktrees):
&&, ;)git worktree remove from inside the worktree or a subdirectorygit worktree prune after removal to self-heal stale registrationsBefore wrapping up, briefly note friction encountered during this work:
If genuinely clean run, say so — but clean runs should be rare. Most work has micro-friction worth capturing.
Log friction to the relevant tasks issue notes or ~/.oro/projects/<name>/decisions&discoveries.md if it's a broader insight.
Then invoke review-docs to check that documentation still matches the code that just landed. Stale docs are worse than no docs.
Then invoke documenting-solutions to capture any non-trivial problems solved during this work. This is not optional — if you learned something worth knowing next time, document it.
After the integration choice is executed:
tasks entries for remaining/discovered work./quality_gate.sh (Go) or uv run pytest && ruff check . && ruff format --check . (Python)git pull --rebase && git push (pre-commit hook auto-syncs tasks)git status shows "up to date with origin"| Option | Merge | Push | Keep Worktree | Cleanup Branch |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Merge | Yes | - | - | Yes |
| 2. PR | - | Yes | Yes | - |
| 3. Keep | - | - | Yes | - |
| 4. Discard | - | - | - | Yes (force) |
discard confirmationgh pr create without checking git remote get-url origin first — the repo may not be on GitHub.worktrees/ / worktrees/)git worktree remove from inside the worktree, or chaining it with && / ;