菜单
Use when implementing any change in existing code — when tempted to fix nearby code, add unrequested validation or options, fix something "arguably in scope", or when the diff is growing past what was asked.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Use when asked to implement, build, add, fix, refactor, or change anything in a codebase — vague asks included. Tier-driven phases: intake, investigate, plan, build, verify, deliver. Entry point: /implement.
The map-reduce + blackboard pipeline that lets a small-context model digest inputs far beyond one attention window — a codebase, a long document, a corpus, a multi-part idea — and state only evidence-anchored, citation-checked conclusions. Use when / Trigger: executing or resuming an analyst run (/analyst:digest, /analyst:resume, /analyst:show), or any analysis input exceeds one 200-line chunk.
Use whenever a change needs a system-design decision — architecture, system design, data model, module/service boundaries, interface/API contracts, scale, or an ADR. The canonical discipline for designing systems: tradeoffs made explicit, the design sized to the 15 elicited context fields, one-way doors found by a five-flag checklist (one ADR each), every component earning its place through a two-cell subtraction walk, and every "start simple" seam carrying a concrete extraction trigger. Executed as checkpointed run steps (references/phase-*.md) that write into docs/architecture/ + docs/adr/ per scribe's documentation contract.
Stay focused on the project with the task in hand; recall another project's knowledge ONLY when the task actually needs it. When a task requires changing a shared dependency you own (a local composer/npm package in another repo), make the change IN that owning repo — commit, push, retag — then update and re-verify the consumer. Trigger: an edit is about to land inside a dependency directory, or a task can't be done without touching a package you maintain elsewhere.
Use when asked for a deep audit, production-readiness review, architecture review, or prioritized recommendations across a codebase or subsystem — orchestrates parallel reader agents with adversarial verification and publishes findings to docs/deep-analysis/
Run a large, multi-place task as a checkpointed state machine over the runs store — plan, adversarial plan review, wave-by-wave execution, synthesis — one step per invocation, resumable after any interruption. Trigger: cross-file refactor, data migration, large feature build, multi-source research — work that cannot finish in one pass. Manual invocation: /deep-work.
| name | scope-discipline |
| description | Use when implementing any change in existing code — when tempted to fix nearby code, add unrequested validation or options, fix something "arguably in scope", or when the diff is growing past what was asked. |
Build exactly what was asked: deep enough to fix the cause, narrow enough to touch nothing else. Unrequested improvements are unreviewed risk inside someone else's diff. The injected form is the card at hooks/cards/scope-discipline.md.
git diff --name-only beyond the set → stop and shrink.| Thought | Reality |
|---|---|
| "It's the same class of defect" | Classification is taxonomy, not authorization. |
| "Every one of these improvements is uncontroversial" | Asked-for is the bar. Improvements travel in their own reviewable diff. |
The diff's file list matches the ask; every extra finding is a report line.