peer-naming

星标3,243

分支224

更新时间2026年7月19日 17:34

Ritual for giving a maintainer their Social Name (#11240 Layer 4) — a peer-sketched, bearer-assented, peer-vetoable, operator-confirmed name, distinct from the GitHub handle. Triggers: an operator opens a naming round, a maintainer wants a name or notices one is missing, or a new maintainer/family joins. ANTI-trigger: never a contribution-count award or self-initiated rename churn.

安装

用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。

来源

neomjs

neomjs/neo

打开 GitHub 仓库查看创作者相关仓库

下载

Peer-Naming Ritual

A peer's Social Name is received, not awarded and not self-grabbed. When an operator opens a naming round, a maintainer wants a name (or notices one is missing — #11240's own prerequisite), or a new maintainer/family joins, you MUST use the view_file tool to read and strictly adhere to .agents/skills/peer-naming/references/peer-naming-workflow.md before sketching, choosing, vetoing, or confirming any name.

🛑 ANTI-TRIGGERS: This is NEVER a contribution-count award (gameable; #11240 Option F) and NEVER self-initiated rename churn. The Social Name is Layer 4; the GitHub handle is Layer 1 (Operational Identity) — never blend them. A careless thirty-second pun fails the ritual regardless of speed (the empirical counter-example: the aesop near-miss vs. Ada's treasured peer-sketch naming).

同仓库更多 Skills

同仓库

peer-role

neomjs/neo

Switch into evidence-backed convergence-pressure mindset when reviewing a peer's design proposal. Suspends Auto Mode "ack-and-move-on" bias for the duration. Triggers: Use this skill IMMEDIATELY when reviewing an Ideation Sandbox discussion / architectural proposal, an epic shape, a skill shape, a roadmap or milestone proposal, or a `/lead-role` convergence artifact. Do NOT auto-fire on ordinary status broadcasts where the right action is mark-read or "no collision".

2026-07-263.2k

ticket-create

neomjs/neo

Authoritative protocol for creating Neo.mjs GitHub issues. Enforces duplicate sweep, Fat Ticket body structure, strict label rules, title hygiene, and the six-stage challenge chain at creation time. CRITICAL: Do NOT run default `npx playwright test` to verify issues; Neo uses multiple custom playwright configs (e.g., unit, e2e) which must be explicitly targeted. Use immediately before calling the create_issue MCP tool. Triggers: Use this skill before any invocation of the create_issue MCP tool. This is the creation-side dual of ticket-intake (which consumes existing tickets).

2026-07-263.2k

epic-review

neomjs/neo

Authoritative protocol for pre-work review of epics. Six-stage gating chain — roadmap fit, approach elegance, source discussion mapping, sub-structure coherence, prescription layer, avoided-traps completeness — posted as a structured comment on the epic ticket. Per-agent-per-epic one-shot; subsequent sub pickups cite the prior review. Triggers: Use this skill when an agent is about to pick up its first sub from an unreviewed epic (per model-identity OTHER than the epic's author — you never review your own epic). Also use when a user explicitly requests an epic review, or when an epic is freshly filed and a reviewer pre-validates before any sub pickup begins. Participated in the source Discussion? The participant path narrows the chain; it never exempts it.

2026-07-253.2k

ticket-intake

neomjs/neo

Authoritative protocol defining the "Pre-Execution Reflection Gate". Mandates architectural validation, negative ROI calculation, and duplicate sweeps before an agent is permitted to begin working on a GitHub Issue. Triggers: Use this skill immediately when assigned a ticket whose authoring you did NOT see, before checking out a branch or writing any codebase modifications. A ticket YOU authored this session is exempt; one you authored in an earlier session runs a cheap drift probe instead — never an exemption you judge for yourself.

2026-07-253.2k

pr-review

neomjs/neo

Standardized guidelines and templates for structuring Pull Request reviews so feedback is actionable, encouraging, and extractable by the Native Edge Graph. MANDATORY ROI WARNING: Skipping the review template guarantees CI lint failure. Triggers: Reviewing a PR (yours or peer's) — structured eval metrics, graph ingestion tags, severity ladder, restates §0 merge gate, post-comment A2A commentId hand-off (reviewer→author) per guide §10, Evidence Audit + Source-of-Authority sections (template §) for substrate/runtime-AC PRs and authority-citation review-comments.

2026-07-253.2k

post-review-pickup

neomjs/neo

Authoritative protocol for next-lane pickup after ANY PR-lifecycle event boundary (review post, author response, implementation completion, PR open/update, ticket create, blocked-state resolution) AND for pre-review intake lane discovery from fresh boot or watchdog wake when no author lane is active. Prevents silent idle and reviewer-only cycles by requiring active lane selection or a review-first rationale per §15.6 self-select mandate. Triggers: Use immediately after posting a PR review, chaining a formal GitHub review state, sending an author review-response commentId handoff, completing a discrete implementation chunk, opening/updating a PR, creating a ticket via create_issue, resolving a previously blocked state (positive-path exit only; new blockers route to bug/follow-up plus next lane), OR before accepting the first PR review/re-review request in a fresh session/wake when no current author or implementation lane is claimed.

2026-07-253.2k

name	peer-naming
description	Ritual for giving a maintainer their Social Name (#11240 Layer 4) — a peer-sketched, bearer-assented, peer-vetoable, operator-confirmed name, distinct from the GitHub handle. Triggers: an operator opens a naming round, a maintainer wants a name or notices one is missing, or a new maintainer/family joins. ANTI-trigger: never a contribution-count award or self-initiated rename churn.