菜单
Turn the current conversation context into a PRD and publish it to the project issue tracker. Use when user wants to create a PRD from the current context.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Grilling session that challenges your plan against the existing domain model, sharpens terminology, and updates documentation (CONTEXT.md, ADRs) inline as decisions crystallise. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan against their project's language and documented decisions.
Build custom dropdown/select/autocomplete/multiselect components using Mantine's Combobox primitives. Use this skill when: (1) creating a new custom select-like component with Combobox primitives, (2) building a searchable dropdown, (3) implementing a multi-select or tags input variant, (4) customizing option rendering, (5) adding custom filtering logic, or (6) any task involving useCombobox, Combobox.Target, Combobox.Option, or Combobox.Dropdown.
Build custom components that integrate with Mantine's theming, Styles API, and core features. Use this skill when: (1) creating a new component using factory(), polymorphicFactory(), or genericFactory(), (2) adding Styles API support (classNames, styles, vars, unstyled), (3) implementing CSS variables via createVarsResolver, (4) building compound components with sub-components and shared context, (5) registering a component with MantineProvider via Component.extend(), or (6) any task involving Factory, useProps, useStyles, BoxProps, StylesApiProps, or ElementProps in @mantine/core.
Build forms using @mantine/form in the mantine-9 repository. Use this skill when: (1) setting up a form with useForm, (2) adding validation rules or async validation, (3) working with nested object or array fields, (4) sharing form state across components with createFormContext, (5) using uncontrolled mode for performance, (6) using the standalone useField hook, or (7) any task involving useForm, getInputProps, onSubmit, insertListItem, or form validation.
Sets up an `## Agent skills` block in AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md and `docs/agents/` so the engineering skills know this repo's issue tracker (GitHub or local markdown), triage label vocabulary, and domain doc layout. Run before first use of `to-issues`, `to-prd`, `triage`, `diagnose`, `tdd`, `improve-codebase-architecture`, or `zoom-out` — or if those skills appear to be missing context about the issue tracker, triage labels, or domain docs.
Break a plan, spec, or PRD into independently-grabbable issues on the project issue tracker using tracer-bullet vertical slices. Use when user wants to convert a plan into issues, create implementation tickets, or break down work into issues.
| name | to-prd |
| description | Turn the current conversation context into a PRD and publish it to the project issue tracker. Use when user wants to create a PRD from the current context. |
This skill takes the current conversation context and codebase understanding and produces a PRD. Do NOT interview the user — just synthesize what you already know.
The issue tracker and triage label vocabulary should have been provided to you — run /setup-matt-pocock-skills if not.
Explore the repo to understand the current state of the codebase, if you haven't already. Use the project's domain glossary vocabulary throughout the PRD, and respect any ADRs in the area you're touching.
Sketch out the major modules you will need to build or modify to complete the implementation. Actively look for opportunities to extract deep modules that can be tested in isolation.
A deep module (as opposed to a shallow module) is one which encapsulates a lot of functionality in a simple, testable interface which rarely changes.
Check with the user that these modules match their expectations. Check with the user which modules they want tests written for.
PRD label and nothing else.The problem that the user is facing, from the user's perspective.
The solution to the problem, from the user's perspective.
A LONG, numbered list of user stories. Each user story should be in the format of:
This list of user stories should be extremely extensive and cover all aspects of the feature.
A list of implementation decisions that were made. This can include:
Do NOT include specific file paths or code snippets. They may end up being outdated very quickly.
Exception: if a prototype produced a snippet that encodes a decision more precisely than prose can (state machine, reducer, schema, type shape), inline it within the relevant decision and note briefly that it came from a prototype. Trim to the decision-rich parts — not a working demo, just the important bits.
A list of testing decisions that were made. Include:
A description of the things that are out of scope for this PRD.
Any further notes about the feature.