octave-ads

name

octave-ads

description

Build ad campaign plans grounded in your Octave library. Generates ad sets with platform-ready creative, audience targeting, negative keywords, and landing page recommendations, every variant derived from an auditable source card built from real prospect language and proof points. Use when user says "build an ad campaign", "create ads", "ad campaign for", "generate ad sets", or asks for paid advertising creative. Do NOT use to analyze ad performance: use /octave-ads-resonance (the resonance loop) instead.

Octave Ads — Campaign Generation

This skill has two modes:

1. Campaign generation (default): Build platform-ready ad campaign plans grounded in your Octave library intelligence. Steps 0–5.
2. Resonance loop (companion skill): once campaigns are live, /octave-ads-resonance pulls performance data, maps winners back to the source cards persisted here, and feeds learnings back into the library.

Principles

Follow these standards during generation. Read each before producing output.

Content and language:

• Editorial rules — no AI-isms, banned vocabulary, honest analyst tone
• Information principles — lead with conclusions, evidence-backed claims, narrative arc

Presentation:

• Presentation principles — use for any visual output (HTML, dashboards, tables); text follows the editorial rules above

Octave data:

• Octave value — prioritize grounded workspace data over generic AI content
• Octave research toolkit — tool selection (list vs. search) and standard error handling when fetching library data and field intelligence in Step 2
• Entity model — canonical entity types and oId prefixes referenced throughout (persona, segment, competitor, proof point, etc.)

Review:

• The Headline Independence Review (Step 3B) is this skill's dedicated review pass over ad creative. Before final delivery, also run the preflight from protocol.md (em dashes, leaked internals, placeholders) over the text output. Any HTML deck generated in Step 5 takes the full protocol as a mandatory gate: it is not opened or delivered until the combined scorecard has printed.

Routing — read this first

Before doing anything else, scan the user's argument string and route to the correct mode:

• If the argument contains any of: resonance, resonance loop, loop, analyze performance, analyse performance, performance analysis, score, score predictions, evaluate → this is a job for the companion skill: hand off to /octave-ads-resonance. Do not run Steps 0–5 or ask any campaign-configuration questions.
• Otherwise → run Steps 0–5 in order (campaign generation). The resonance loop can still be offered as a follow-up action in Step 5.

If the user's intent is ambiguous (e.g. they ran /octave-ads with no arguments), ask:

AskUserQuestion({
  questions: [{
    question: "What would you like to do?",
    header: "Mode",
    options: [
      { label: "Build a new ad campaign", description: "Generate ad sets, creative variants, targeting, and landing page recommendations grounded in your Octave library" },
      { label: "Run the resonance loop", description: "Analyze ad performance from existing campaigns and feed learnings back into the library — hands off to /octave-ads-resonance" }
    ],
    multiSelect: false
  }]
})

---

Build the Ad Campaign

Generate platform-ready ad campaign plans grounded in your Octave library intelligence. Creates one ad set per persona or ICP, with creative variants generated from real prospect language extracted from calls and emails.

MCP Server: This skill requires the Octave MCP server. Look for available MCP tools that match the Octave tool names (e.g., list_entities, list_findings, search_knowledge_base, get_entity). The MCP server prefix varies by workspace — it may be {octave_mcp}__, mcp__octave_myworkspace__, or another name. If multiple Octave-like MCP servers are available and you're unsure which to use, ask the user which workspace to target.

---

Step 0: Campaign Angle & Creative Direction

This step is critical. Before asking platform/structure questions, establish the campaign's creative direction. The angle is the most important decision — it determines what every headline, description, and keyword should say.

Step 0A: Parse user arguments

First, scan the user's freeform arguments for context they've already provided:

1. Target audience — persona type, seniority, company stage, industry (e.g., "VPs of Engineering at mid-market FinServ companies")
2. Situation / context — what the buyer is doing or experiencing that makes them a target RIGHT NOW (e.g., "evaluating compliance automation solutions after a failed audit")
3. Campaign angle — the specific framing or positioning the user wants (may be implicit in the situation)

Step 0B: Ask how they want to develop the creative direction

Using AskUserQuestion, ask:

"How do you want to approach the creative direction for this campaign?"

1. I have a specific angle — "I know the exact framing and messaging I want. Let me describe it." → Collect their angle in detail (situation, framing, key phrases to include). This becomes the primary creative driver, and library data provides supporting evidence.

2. Let's brainstorm together — "I have some ideas but want to explore options." → Use the Octave library to surface 3-5 potential angles (derived from use cases, hypotheses, competitor gaps, and findings that match the target audience). Present them as options with a brief rationale for each. Let the user pick one or combine elements. Then proceed.

3. Auto-generate from my Octave library — "Just use what's in my library to find the best angle." → Analyze the target persona/segment, search for the highest-signal use cases and hypotheses, and select the strongest angle automatically. Present the chosen angle to the user for confirmation before generating creative.

If the user already provided a clear angle in their arguments, acknowledge it and ask: "You mentioned [angle]. Should I build the entire campaign around this, or do you want to explore other angles too?"

How the angle shapes everything

The selected angle becomes the primary creative driver for the entire campaign. It shapes:

• Headline language: Headlines should reference the buyer's situation, not just generic product benefits. If the user says "VPs dealing with compliance gaps," headlines should speak to audit pain, not just "automation platform."
• Keyword strategy: Keywords should match what the target audience would actually search for given their situation (e.g., "compliance automation," "audit preparation software," "regulatory risk management").
• Description copy: Descriptions should address the specific angle, not default to generic positioning.
• Use case selection: Prioritize use cases that map to the buyer's stated situation.

Example

User input: generate ad campaign for VPs of Engineering at mid-market FinServ companies dealing with compliance automation gaps

Extracted:

• Target: VPs of Engineering at mid-market Financial Services companies
• Situation: They're struggling with manual compliance processes that don't scale
• Angle: Your product automates the compliance workflow they're currently doing by hand — turning audit prep from weeks to hours

This angle should appear in EVERY variant — pain-focused variants should reference "your team spends weeks preparing for audits that should take hours," outcome-focused should reference "engineering teams that automated compliance prep cut audit cycles by X%," etc.

---

Step 1: Campaign Configuration

Ask the user these questions using AskUserQuestion. Each question should be its own AskUserQuestion call — do NOT bundle unrelated questions together (e.g., platform and voice are independent choices and must be asked separately). Collect all answers before proceeding.

Question 1: Ad Platform

Ask which platform they're building for. This determines creative constraints.

Platform	Headlines	Max H Length	Descriptions	Max D Length	Notes
Google Search	Up to 15	30 chars	Up to 4	90 chars	Responsive Search Ads
Google Display	Up to 5	30 chars	Up to 5	90 chars	Responsive Display Ads
Meta (Facebook/Instagram)	1 primary text	125 chars	1 headline	40 chars	Single image/video ads
LinkedIn	1 intro text	150 chars	1 headline	70 chars	Sponsored Content

Question 2: Ad Set Structure

Ask how they want to structure their ad sets:

• By ICP (Persona + Segment) (Recommended) — One ad set per persona-segment intersection. Most targeted. Example: "VP Engineering at Enterprise FinServ"
• By Persona only — One ad set per persona. Broader reach. Example: "VP Engineering"
• By Segment only — One ad set per market segment. Broadest. Example: "Enterprise Financial Services"
• Custom selection — Let me pick specific personas/segments

Question 3: Campaign Objective

Ask what their campaign goal is:

• Lead Generation — Drive sign-ups, demo requests, downloads
• Brand Awareness — Increase visibility with target audience
• Competitive Displacement — Target users of specific competitors
• Product Launch — Promote a new feature or product

Question 3B: Product Launch Context (conditional — only if Product Launch selected)

If the user selected Product Launch, ask a follow-up question to collect launch details. This context shapes every variant's creative:

Ask (as a single AskUserQuestion with free-text, or prompt them to describe):

• What is launching? — New product, new feature, major update, pricing change, new integration, etc.
• What's the key differentiator or angle? — What makes this launch worth talking about? What problem does it solve that wasn't solved before?
• Is there a launch date or urgency? — Time-bounded campaigns can use urgency framing in creative.
• Any specific messaging or taglines already decided? — If the marketing team has approved language, we should use it rather than generating from scratch.

Store these answers and use them throughout Step 3 to ensure every variant is grounded in the specific launch, not generic product messaging. The launch context should be the PRIMARY creative driver — library data (personas, use cases, proof points) provides supporting evidence and targeting, but the launch angle leads.

Question 4: Landing Page

Before asking, fetch the workspace domain:

→ {octave_mcp}__verify_connection()

Extract the workspace's website domain from the connection response (e.g., acme.com). Use this as the default landing page base URL.

Ask about landing pages:

• Use my website ({domain}) — Use https://{domain} as the base landing page URL. Append relevant paths per ad set if the user provides them, or suggest paths based on use case (e.g., https://{domain}/compliance, https://{domain}/demo).
• I have specific landing pages — Collect URLs per ad set or one global URL
• Suggest from my resources — We'll search their Octave resources for relevant content
• I'll figure it out later — Skip landing page recommendations

Question 5: Brand Voice & Tone

Ask about voice and tone for the creative:

• Use my Octave brand voice — We'll fetch your saved brand voice settings and apply them to all creative
• Professional / authoritative — Confident, direct, data-driven. Suits enterprise audiences.
• Conversational / peer-to-peer — Casual, relatable, sounds like a colleague. Suits growth-stage audiences.
• Provocative / challenger — Bold, contrarian, challenges the status quo. Suits competitive campaigns.
• Custom — I'll describe the voice I want

If they choose "Use my Octave brand voice", fetch it in Step 2:

→ {octave_mcp}__list_entities(entityType: "brand_voice")
→ {octave_mcp}__get_entity(oId: "{brand_voice_oId}")  // fetch full voice guidelines (tone, word choice, style rules)

Use the full brand voice definition — tone rules, word choice guidance, sentence style, things to avoid — to shape all creative. The brand voice sets the overall register across ALL variants, but does NOT override the variant-specific methodology (pain-focused still leads with pain, social proof still leads with proof points, etc.).

If they choose "Custom", ask them to describe it in 1-2 sentences (e.g., "Sharp, slightly irreverent, like a smart friend who works in the industry").

The selected voice/tone should be applied consistently across ALL variants in ALL ad sets. It shapes word choice, sentence structure, and emotional register — but does NOT override the variant-specific methodology (pain-focused still leads with pain, social proof still leads with proof points, etc.).

Question 6: Budget Context (optional)

Ask if they want to share approximate monthly budget. This helps calibrate the number of ad sets and variants. Not required — skip if they prefer not to share.

---

Step 2: Fetch Library Data

Based on the ad set structure chosen in Step 1, fetch the relevant data from Octave MCP.

2A: Fetch Personas and/or Segments

If ICP or Persona mode:
  → {octave_mcp}__list_entities(entityType: "persona")

If ICP or Segment mode:
  → {octave_mcp}__list_entities(entityType: "segment")

Present the list to the user and ask them to confirm which ones to build ad sets for, or select "all."

2B: Fetch Use Cases + Competitors

Fetch all use cases and competitors — these inform creative themes and negative targeting.

→ {octave_mcp}__list_entities(entityType: "use_case")
→ {octave_mcp}__list_entities(entityType: "competitor")
→ {octave_mcp}__list_entities(entityType: "proof_point")
→ {octave_mcp}__list_entities(entityType: "reference")

2C: Fetch Field Intelligence

Use list_findings to surface real prospect language from calls and emails. This is the highest-value data source for ad creative — it captures how buyers actually describe their problems in their own words.

For each selected persona/segment, fetch findings using natural language queries:

→ {octave_mcp}__list_findings(
    query: "what pain points are prospects mentioning",
    eventFilters: { personas: ["{persona_oId}"], segments: ["{segment_oId}"] },
    limit: 20
  )

→ {octave_mcp}__list_findings(
    query: "objections from prospects",
    eventFilters: { personas: ["{persona_oId}"], segments: ["{segment_oId}"] },
    limit: 20
  )

→ {octave_mcp}__list_findings(
    query: "what's getting customers excited about our product",
    eventFilters: { personas: ["{persona_oId}"], segments: ["{segment_oId}"] },
    limit: 20
  )

Also fetch competitive mentions from conversations:

→ {octave_mcp}__list_findings(
    query: "competitor mentions and comparisons",
    limit: 20
  )

Additionally, search the knowledge base for library-level intelligence (entity descriptions, Motion ICP narratives, hypotheses):

→ {octave_mcp}__search_knowledge_base(
    query: "{persona name} pain points challenges objections",
    includeResources: false,
    limit: 10
  )

Priority: Findings from list_findings (real prospect voice) should ALWAYS be preferred over library entity descriptions when writing ad creative. Library data is the fallback when no findings exist.

2E: Competitive Narrative Gap Analysis

For EACH competitor entity, build a narrative gap analysis. This is the foundation for all competitive ad variants.

Step 1 — Their public narrative: Read the competitor entity description from the library. This captures their claimed positioning (e.g., "orchestrate any workflow with 100+ integrations").

Step 2 — What prospects actually say about them: Search for real mentions of this competitor in calls and emails using list_findings:

→ {octave_mcp}__list_findings(
    query: "what are prospects saying about {competitor name}",
    eventFilters: { competitors: ["{competitor_oId}"] },
    limit: 20
  )

Also search the knowledge base for library-level competitive intelligence:

→ {octave_mcp}__search_knowledge_base(
    query: "{competitor name} problems limitations frustrations switching",
    includeResources: false,
    limit: 10
  )

Step 3 — Identify the gap: Compare the competitor's public narrative (what they promise) with what your prospects actually experience (what they say in calls/emails). The gap between promise and reality is your competitive angle.

Produce a Narrative Gap Card for each competitor:

### Competitor: {name}
- **Their narrative**: {what they claim — from library entity description}
- **What prospects actually say**: {direct quotes from calls/emails about this competitor}
- **The gap**: {one sentence: they promise X, prospects experience Y}
- **Your exploit angle**: {how to position against this specific gap}
- **Sample displacement headline**: {one headline that exploits the gap}

If no prospect language exists about a competitor, note: "No field intelligence on {competitor} yet — competitive variant uses library positioning only. Connect call integrations to surface real prospect frustrations with this competitor."

These narrative gap cards drive the competitive variant generation in Step 3.

2D: Fetch Resources for Landing Pages (if requested)

If the user chose "Suggest from my resources":

→ {octave_mcp}__search_knowledge_base(
    query: "{persona/use case} landing page case study datasheet",
    includeResources: true,
    limit: 5
  )

Suggest the most relevant resource URL as the landing page for each ad set.

2F: Build Variant Source Cards

This step is critical. Before generating any ad creative, build a structured analytical artifact — a Source Card — for every variant type you intend to generate. Source cards are the creative brief for each variant. The creative is derived FROM the card. Headlines and descriptions that can't trace back to a source card don't ship.

The Narrative Gap Card (Step 2E) already serves this purpose for the competitive variant. Now build equivalent cards for every other variant type.

For EACH ad set (persona/segment), build the following source cards using the data fetched in Steps 2A-2C. Not every card is required — skip any where the underlying data doesn't exist (e.g., skip Proof Chain if no proof points match this persona). But always produce at least: Pain Language Audit, one of Proof Chain or Compounding Cost Model, and Self-Selection Matrix.

See source-card-templates.md for the seven source card templates (Pain Language Audit, Proof Chain, Self-Selection Matrix, Compounding Cost Model, Contrarian Thesis, Social Proof Hierarchy, Metric Defensibility).

---

How Source Cards flow into Step 3:

Each variant's creative generation in Step 3 now follows this process:

1. Read the source card for that variant type
2. Use the "headline derivation" field as the starting point for headline writing
3. Use the source card's data tier / confidence tier to set the right level of claim strength
4. Cite the source card in the variant's attribution

If a source card reveals that the data doesn't support a variant (e.g., Proof Chain shows no defensible metrics → skip Data-Driven; Self-Selection Matrix shows no question scores above 6/10 → skip Question-Based), skip that variant and note why. This prevents weak variants from diluting the campaign.

---

Step 2G: Persist Source Cards to Disk

Always do this, immediately after building the source cards in Step 2F and before generating creative in Step 3. Persisting source cards is what makes the resonance loop's (/octave-ads-resonance) Path A (forward inference from cards → variants → performance) actually work in future runs. Without this step, the loop falls back to Path B (reverse-inference from headlines), which is much weaker.

Where to write

Write source cards to ~/.octave/source_cards/<workspace_slug>/<campaign_slug>.json:

• <workspace_slug> is derived from the Octave workspace name returned by {octave_mcp}__verify_connection() (called earlier in Step 1 Question 4 for the landing page domain). Lowercase, replace spaces and special characters with hyphens, strip everything that isn't [a-z0-9-]. Example: workspace "Acme Marketing" → acme-marketing.
• <campaign_slug> is derived from the campaign's identifying details: <persona-slug>-<segment-slug>-<YYYY-MM-DD>. If the user has explicitly named the campaign, use that name (slugified). Example: vp-engineering-enterprise-finserv-2026-04-08.

If the file already exists at the target path (re-running Step 2F for the same campaign), append a -v2, -v3, etc. suffix. Never overwrite an existing source card file — the resonance loop may have already evaluated predictions tied to it.

What to write

The file is a single JSON object. See references/source-cards.template.json for a starter. The schema:

{
  "schema_version": "0.1",
  "campaign_metadata": {
    "workspace_slug": "...",
    "campaign_slug": "...",
    "campaign_name": "Human-readable name as the user would describe it",
    "generated_at": "ISO timestamp",
    "generated_by": "/octave-ads campaign generation",
    "platform": "Google Search | Google Display | Meta | LinkedIn",
    "objective": "Lead Generation | Brand Awareness | Competitive Displacement | Product Launch",
    "personas": ["..."],
    "segments": ["..."],
    "campaign_angle": "The angle from Step 0, in one sentence"
  },
  "source_cards" 
    
       
       
       
       
         
         
         
         
         
      
    
    
  
   

The headlines_by_variant field starts as an empty object. Step 3 fills it in after creative generation, mapping each {ad_set}/{variant_type} key to the array of headlines that were actually generated. This is what the resonance loop's Path A matches against in BigQuery later.

How to write

1. Compute the workspace_slug and campaign_slug.
2. Check if the directory exists: ls ~/.octave/source_cards/<workspace_slug>/ 2>/dev/null.
3. If not, create it: mkdir -p ~/.octave/source_cards/<workspace_slug>/.
4. Check for existing files matching the campaign_slug. If a file exists, increment the version suffix.
5. Write the JSON file. Use chmod 600 since it may contain prospect quotes from real calls.
6. Tell the user explicitly: "Saved source cards to ~/.octave/source_cards/<workspace_slug>/<campaign_slug>.json. The resonance loop will use these to map performance back to derivation chains in future runs."

Why this is unconditional

Source card persistence used to be optional in earlier versions of this skill. It is now mandatory because:

• The directory lives in $HOME/.octave/, which is gitignored in the lfgtm repo and isolated per user
• Files are user-owned with mode 600
• The cost of storing a few KB of JSON per campaign is negligible
• The resonance loop is dramatically more useful with Path A available

If the user explicitly objects to persistence (e.g., they don't want any local files), they can pass --no-persist-source-cards as an argument and Step 2G is skipped. Default is to persist.

---

Step 3: Generate Ad Sets

CRITICAL: If Step 0 extracted a campaign angle from the user's arguments, that angle MUST be woven into every variant's creative. The angle is not supplementary context — it is the primary lens through which all headlines, descriptions, and keyword strategies should be written. Library data (personas, use cases, proof points) provides supporting evidence, but the user's stated angle leads.

For EACH persona/ICP/segment (based on the structure chosen), generate a complete ad set plan.

Ad Set Template

For each ad set, produce:

## Ad Set: {Persona Name} {— Segment Name if ICP mode}

### Theme & Positioning
- **Primary Use Case**: {top use case for this persona from library}
- **Secondary Use Case**: {second use case}
- **Core Pain Point**: {from knowledge base search}
- **Competitive Angle**: {if campaign is competitive displacement, or if competitor is frequently mentioned for this persona}

### Ad Creative Variants

Generate 4-8 ad variants per ad set. **Every variant MUST be derived from its corresponding Source Card built in Step 2F.** The source card is the creative brief — read it first, use its "headline derivation" field as the starting point, and cite it in attribution. If a source card revealed insufficient data for a variant type, skip that variant (the card already explains why).

Apply the selected brand voice/tone from Step 1 across all variants. Not every variant is required — skip any where the source card flagged insufficient data. But always include at least pain-focused, outcome-focused, and one of status quo or question-based.

1. **Pain-focused** — Lead with the prospect's pain, ideally in their own words.
   - **Source Card**: Pain Language Audit (Step 2F). Use the "emotional core" and "specific dysfunction named" fields to set the angle. Use the "headline derivation" field as the starting point.
   - **Methodology**: The Pain Language Audit ranked raw prospect language by vividness. Start from the top — the most visceral quote or phrasing. Adapt for character limits but preserve the emotional core identified in the card. The data tier (FIELD vs. LIBRARY vs. INFERRED) determines your confidence level and attribution.
   - **Skip condition**: If the Pain Language Audit couldn't identify a specific dysfunction (only vague "things are hard"), skip and double up on another variant.

2. **Outcome-focused** — Lead with the transformation / result.
   - **Source Card**: Proof Chain Card (Step 2F). Use the "best available claim for this persona" field. Respect the confidence tier — don't make Named claims from Anonymized data.
 : The Proof Chain Card already mapped claims → sources → confidence tiers. Pick the claim with the best combination of metric impressiveness AND persona relevance. The headline IS the number. The description provides the context the Proof Chain Card says is needed to interpret it.
 : If the Proof Chain Card found no proof points matching this persona/segment with confidence tier above Aggregate, skip and note why.

  — Lead with evidence that others like them succeeded.
 : Social Proof Hierarchy (Step 2F). Use the "best proof for this persona" field and respect the tier ranking.
 : The Social Proof Hierarchy already ranked proof assets by strength and segment relevance. Use the highest-tier proof that actually matches this persona's segment. If there's a segment mismatch (the card flags this), acknowledge it in attribution. Best: named customer + metric. Good: anonymized + metric. Acceptable: aggregate.
 : If the Social Proof Hierarchy found no Tier 1 or Tier 2 proof for this persona, skip. Tier 3 (aggregate) rarely justifies a standalone variant.

  — Exploit the specific gap between what a competitor promises and what prospects actually experience.
 : Narrative Gap Card (Step 2E — already built). The card's "exploit angle" and "sample displacement headline" are the starting points.
 : NEVER write generic "we're better" copy. The headline should name the gap identified in the card: if they promise orchestration but prospects experience context-blindness, write "Your Workflows Are Smart. Your Context Isn't." The ad should feel like it was written by someone who's heard the prospect's frustration firsthand — because it was (or because the card honestly notes it wasn't).
 : If no Narrative Gap Card exists for a competitor relevant to this persona, skip.

  — Ask a question that surfaces the pain point and makes the reader self-identify.
 : Self-Selection Matrix (Step 2F). Use the question with the highest specificity score. The card's "why it works" field explains the self-selection mechanism.
 : The Self-Selection Matrix already scored candidate questions by specificity. Pick the highest-scoring question. The card shows exactly who says YES (your target) and who says NO (everyone else). If the winning question scores below 7/10, consider combining elements from multiple candidates to sharpen it.
 : If no question in the Self-Selection Matrix scores above 6/10, skip. A weak question wastes the headline slot.

  — Lead with a specific stat, metric, or proof point that stops the scroll.
 : Metric Defensibility Card (Step 2F). Use the number only if the card's "should we use it?" field says YES.
 : The Metric Defensibility Card already stress-tested the most dramatic metric available. If it passed, the number IS the headline. The description provides the context the card says is needed. If the card flagged defensibility concerns, soften the claim in the description (e.g., "in one team's experience" vs. implied universal truth).
 : If the Metric Defensibility Card said NO (not defensible for this audience), skip this variant entirely. Do NOT fabricate or substitute a weaker metric — just skip.

  — Make the case that doing nothing is the riskiest option.
 : Compounding Cost Model (Step 2F). Use the "rate of decay" and "tipping point" fields to frame the headline. Use the "key word" field (the repeating unit) to structure the copy.
 : This is NOT pain-focused (which says "you have this problem"). The Compounding Cost Model quantifies what COMPOUNDS. Use the card's identified repeating unit ("every hire," "each week," "per quarter") as the structural element. The tipping point becomes the description's urgency driver.
 : If the Compounding Cost Model couldn't identify a specific thing that compounds (only vague "things get worse"), skip.

  — Position the company as seeing a truth the market hasn't recognized yet.
 : Contrarian Thesis Card (Step 2F). Use the "reframe" field as the headline and the "what the market believes" field as the implicit foil.
 : The Contrarian Thesis Card already identified the assumption, the counter-truth, and the reframe. The headline IS the reframe (or a compressed version of it). The description provides just enough context for the reader to feel the shift. The product is implied, not stated. The card's "why this is credible from your brand" field ensures you're not making a claim your brand can't back.
 : If the Contrarian Thesis Card couldn't find a genuine contrarian insight (the "what's actually true" is just a rephrased feature claim), skip. Fake thought leadership is worse than no thought leadership.

For each variant, generate creative that respects the platform constraints from Step 1.

 (per variant):

Headline 1 (30 chars): "Stop Compliance Audit Panic" Headline 2 (30 chars): "Automated Risk Monitoring" Headline 3 (30 chars): "Trusted by 200+ FinServs" Description 1 (90 chars): "Your security team shouldn't chase every new regulation. Get continuous compliance monitoring." Description 2 (90 chars): "Join 200+ financial services firms who eliminated audit fire drills. Book a demo today."

**Meta example** (per variant):

Primary Text (125 chars): "Your security team is drowning in compliance audits. There's a better way." Headline (40 chars): "End Compliance Fire Drills"

### Prospect Language Sources
For each variant, cite WHERE the language came from:
- "getting burned on audits" — extracted from call with VP Eng at Acme Corp (2 weeks ago)
- "board breathing down our necks" — extracted from email reply by CTO at FinCo

If no prospect language is available for this persona, note: "No field intelligence available yet — creative is based on library entity descriptions. Connect call/email integrations to generate prospect-voice creative."

### Audience Targeting Recommendations

**Positive targeting:**
- Job titles: {derived from persona definition — e.g., "VP Engineering", "Director of Engineering", "Head of Engineering"}
- Industries: {derived from segment — e.g., "Financial Services", "Banking", "Insurance"}
- Company size: {derived from segment — e.g., "500-5000 employees"}
- Interests/keywords: {derived from use cases + competitor names}
- Platform-specific:
  - Google Search keywords: {5-10 recommended keywords derived from use case language}
  - Meta interests: {interest categories matching persona}
  - LinkedIn: {job functions, seniority levels, company sizes}

**Negative targeting / exclusions:**
- Job titles to exclude: {personas NOT in the target set — e.g., if targeting VPs, exclude individual contributors, interns, students}
- Industries to exclude: {segments NOT in the target set}
- Negative keywords (Google): {keywords that would attract wrong audience — e.g., "free", "tutorial", "certification", "jobs", competitor product names if NOT doing competitive campaign}

### Landing Page Recommendation
- **Suggested URL**: {from resources search, or user-provided}
- **Why**: {which resource matches this persona/use case best}
- If no resource found: "No matching resource found. Consider creating a landing page focused on {primary use case} for {persona}."

### Estimated Keyword Competitiveness (Google only)
Based on the use case language and competitor landscape in your library, categorize keywords as:
- **High competition** (likely expensive): {generic industry terms, competitor names}
- **Medium competition**: {specific use case terms}
- **Low competition / long-tail** (best value): {prospect-specific language, niche terms from calls}

---

Step 3B: Headline Independence Review

After generating all ad sets, perform a dedicated review pass on EVERY headline across all variants. This is a separate, explicit step — not part of initial generation.

Process

1. Extract all headlines — Collect every headline from every variant across all ad sets into a flat list.

2. Read each headline in complete isolation — Cover up the variant context, the other headlines, and the descriptions. Ask: "If this headline appeared alone on a search results page with NO surrounding context, would a person in the target audience understand what it means and find it compelling?"

3. Check against these failure modes:

   Failure Mode	Example	Fix
   Fragment / continuation	"But Not Smarter. Until Now." — only makes sense paired with a preceding headline	Rewrite as standalone thought: "Fast AI Still Gets It Wrong"
   Vague pronoun / "this"	"Learn How We Fix This" — "This" refers to nothing in isolation	Replace with specific noun: "See How We Solve Manual Audit Prep"
   Insider jargon in headline	"Your Compliance Drift Is Growing" — "Compliance Drift" is your team's internal term, not buyer language	Use buyer's words: "Your Audit Prep Is Falling Behind"
   Over character limit	"Can Your Team Sell Without You?" (31 chars) — exceeds 30 char Google limit	Shorten: "Can Reps Sell Without You?" (26 chars)
   Too generic	"Better Marketing With AI" — could be any company	Add specificity: "AI That Knows Your Buyers"

4. CTA headlines are exempt from the standalone-meaning test — Headlines like "Book a Demo Today" or "Get a Free Assessment" are intentionally generic CTAs. They don't need to convey a proposition on their own because Google pairs them with other headlines. But verify there is exactly ONE CTA headline per variant (not zero, not all three).

5. Rewrite any failing headlines — Fix the headline, recount characters, and verify the replacement also stands alone. Update both the text output and the visual deck (if generated).

6. Present the review results — Show the user a summary of what was changed:

   ### Headline Independence Review
   
   Reviewed X headlines across Y variants.
   
   | Original | Issue | Replacement |
   |----------|-------|-------------|
   | "But Not Smarter. Until Now." | Fragment — meaningless alone | "Fast AI Still Gets It Wrong" |
   | ... | ... | ... |
   
   Z headlines passed. N headlines rewritten.
   

This review step catches errors that are invisible during generation (when you're thinking about headlines as a set) but obvious once you read each one in isolation — which is how Google will actually serve them.

---

Step 3C: Update Persisted Source Cards With Final Headlines

After Steps 3 and 3B are complete and all final headlines are settled, update the source card file written in Step 2G with the actual headlines that were generated for each variant. This is what closes the loop — without this update, Path A in the resonance loop has no way to match BigQuery performance back to source cards.

1. Read the source card file at ~/.octave/source_cards/<workspace_slug>/<campaign_slug>.json.
2. Populate the headlines_by_variant field. The shape is { "<ad_set_name>": { "<variant_type>": [headline strings...], ... }, ... }. Example:

"headlines_by_variant": {
  "VP Engineering — Enterprise FinServ": {
    "pain-focused": [
      "Still Prepping Audits By Hand?",
      "Manual Audit Prep Is Killing You",
      "Audit Prep Shouldn't Take Weeks",
      "Stop Manual Compliance Work",
      "Book a Demo Today"
    ],
    "outcome-focused": ["...", "..."],
    "social-proof": ["...", "..."]
  },
  "Director Compliance × Mid-Market": { ... }
}

3. Also include the descriptions in a parallel descriptions_by_variant field with the same shape.
4. Write the updated file back. Tell the user: "Updated source cards file at ~/.octave/source_cards/<workspace_slug>/<campaign_slug>.json with N final headlines across M variants. The resonance loop will use these to map performance back to derivation chains."

Skipping this step means the resonance loop cannot use Path A for this campaign. It will still work in Path B (reverse-inference from headlines), but without the strong forward derivation chain.

---

Step 4: Campaign Summary

After generating all ad sets, produce a campaign summary:

# Campaign Plan Summary

## Overview
- **Platform**: {platform}
- **Objective**: {objective}
- **Ad Sets**: {count}
- **Total Ad Variants**: {count}
- **Personas Covered**: {list}
- **Segments Covered**: {list}

## Ad Set Breakdown
| Ad Set | Persona | Segment | Primary Theme | Variants | Landing Page |
|--------|---------|---------|---------------|----------|-------------|
| 1 | VP Eng | Enterprise FinServ | Compliance Risk | 4 | /compliance |
| 2 | CTO | Mid-Market SaaS | Dev Efficiency | 3 | /engineering |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |

## Negative Targeting (Campaign-Level)
- **Excluded job titles**: {combined exclusions}
- **Negative keywords**: {combined negative keywords}
- **Excluded demographics**: {age groups, locations if applicable}

## Field Intelligence Coverage
- **Personas with prospect language data**: X of Y
- **Personas using library-only creative**: X of Y
- **Recommendation**: {if low coverage, suggest connecting more integrations}

## Next Steps
1. Review and refine ad creative variants
2. Set up campaign in {platform} using the targeting recommendations
3. Upload creative variants as responsive ads
4. Set budget allocation across ad sets
5. Track performance and close the loop with your Octave library intelligence

---

Step 5: Offer Follow-Up Actions

Ask the user via AskUserQuestion:

1. Refine a specific ad set — Regenerate creative for one ad set with different angles
2. Add a competitive campaign — Build ad sets specifically targeting competitor users
3. Generate more variants — Add more creative variants to existing ad sets
4. Export as CSV — Format the campaign plan for bulk upload to the ad platform
5. Generate visual campaign deck — Create a self-contained HTML slide deck showing the full campaign with variant grids, rationale, targeting, competitive gap cards, and budget allocation. Useful for sharing with stakeholders or reviewing the campaign visually.
6. Resonance loop — Hand off to /octave-ads-resonance: analyze ad performance, map winners back to source cards, and generate library updates + sales intelligence.
7. Done — Finished

If they choose export, ask which platform:

AskUserQuestion({
  questions: [{
    question: "Which ad platform are you exporting for?",
    header: "Platform",
    options: [
      {
        label: "Google Ads (Web UI)",
        description: "Generates separate CSV files per entity type for the Google Ads web UI bulk upload (Tools → Bulk Actions → Uploads)."
      },
      {
        label: "Google Ads (Editor)",
        description: "Single file for the Google Ads Editor desktop app. Tab-separated UTF-16, all entity types in one file. Import via Account → Import → From file."
      },
      {
        label: "Meta Ads",
        description: "Single CSV with Primary Text, Headline, Description, Link, and Call to Action columns. One row per ad variant."
      },
      {
        label: "LinkedIn Ads",
        description: "Single CSV with Intro Text, Headline, Description, Destination URL columns. One row per ad variant."
      }
    ],
    multiSelect: false
  }]
})

Google Ads Export

1. Collect Customer ID: Ask the user for the Google Ads Customer ID of the upload destination account (the account number in the Google Ads header, e.g., 123-456-7890). For the web UI bulk upload this can be either an MCC or a sub-account — whichever you'll select in the Ads UI before clicking Upload. Using an ID that doesn't match the active account in the UI causes "entity does not exist" errors. Note: this is the upload destination, not the login-customer-id used by the API/MCP path — the web UI handles MCC routing automatically.

2. Read the format reference: Read references/google-ads-csv-format.md for the exact column layouts, quoting rules, and validation checklist.

3. Generate separate CSV files: The Google Ads web UI requires one CSV per entity type, each with its own column layout. Ask the user where to save (suggest ~/Desktop/{campaign-name}/), then generate:

{campaign-name}/
├── 1-campaign.csv          # Campaign settings
├── 2-ad-groups.csv         # One row per ad set / persona
├── 3-ads.csv               # RSAs with 5+ headlines, 2+ descriptions per ad group
├── 4-keywords.csv          # All keywords with match types
└── 5-negative-keywords.csv # All negative keywords with match types and level

4. Critical rules:

   • Double-quote every field — prevents column shifts from pipes, apostrophes, em dashes
   • Escape internal quotes by doubling: Doesn't → "Doesn""t"
   • EU political ads = No — campaign upload fails without this
   • Minimum 5 distinct headlines per RSA — Google rejects ads with fewer
   • Match types use full words: Broad match, Phrase match, Exact match — not abbreviations
   • Negative keywords need a Level: Ad group or Campaign
   • Upload in order: campaign first, then ad groups, then ads, then keywords, then negatives — each depends on the previous

5. Tell the user: "Upload these files to Google Ads → Tools → Bulk Actions → Uploads, in numbered order. Wait for each to succeed before uploading the next. All campaigns are set to Paused — nothing will run until you explicitly enable them."

Google Ads Editor Export

1. Read the format reference: Read references/google-ads-editor-format.md for the exact column layout, entity type detection rules, and Python generation snippet.

2. Generate a single file: The Ads Editor uses a tab-separated UTF-16 file with 144 columns. All entity types (campaigns, ad groups, ads, keywords) go in one file. No Customer ID needed — it imports into whatever account is open.

3. Use Python to generate: Claude cannot write UTF-16 tab-separated files directly. Use a Bash tool call with the Python snippet from the reference doc to generate the file. Save to ~/Desktop/{campaign-name}-editor.csv.

4. Critical rules:

   • UTF-16 encoding, tab-separated — not comma-separated
   • No Row Type or Action columns — entity type inferred from populated columns
   • EU political ads = Doesn't have EU political ads (not No)
   • Languages = en (not English)
   • Minimum 5 distinct headlines per RSA
   • Keyword match type via syntax: broad = bare text, phrase = "quoted", exact = [bracketed]
   • Rows in dependency order: campaigns → ad groups → ads → keywords

5. Tell the user: "Open Google Ads Editor, sign into your account, then Account → Import → From file. All campaigns are set to Paused. Review in the Editor, then Post to push live."

Meta Ads Export

Single CSV with columns: Primary Text, Headline, Description, Link, Call to Action. One row per ad variant. Apply platform character limits (Primary Text: 125 chars, Headline: 40 chars).

LinkedIn Ads Export

Single CSV with columns: Intro Text, Headline, Description, Destination URL. One row per ad variant. Apply platform character limits (Intro Text: 150 chars, Headline: 70 chars).

If they choose Generate visual campaign deck, read references/html-deck-template.md for the full deck structure, section layout, variant color coding, and visual design spec. Follow that template to produce the HTML file. Since this is styled HTML shared with stakeholders, style it with the workspace company's brand kit per brand-kit-usage.md rather than a generic look.

---

Important Notes

Platform & Format Rules

• Character limits are hard constraints — NEVER exceed the platform's character limits. Count characters for every headline and description. If a headline is 31 chars for Google Search, it's invalid. Show the character count in parentheses after each headline/description.
• Every headline MUST stand completely alone — Google Responsive Search Ads rotate and combine headlines in any order. NEVER split a sentence across two headline slots (e.g., "Signal to Campaign in Hours Not" / "Weeks" is WRONG — "Weeks" is meaningless on its own). After generating all headlines for a variant, re-read each one in complete isolation. If it doesn't communicate a clear, complete idea by itself, rewrite it.
• Include at least one CTA headline per variant — Google needs a CTA option in the rotation. Include at least one headline like "Book a Demo Today", "See How It Works", or "Get a Free Assessment" so Google can pair it with any other headline. Don't make ALL headlines CTAs — one per variant is enough.
• Platform differences matter — Google Search is keyword-intent-driven (people searching for solutions). Meta/LinkedIn is interruption-driven (people scrolling). Adjust tone accordingly: Google = answer the query, Meta/LinkedIn = stop the scroll.

Creative Quality Rules

• Each variant must have a distinct emotional register — Pain-focused should feel urgent and visceral. Outcome-focused should feel aspirational and concrete. Status quo should feel ominous and inevitable. Authority should feel provocative and contrarian. Data-driven should feel matter-of-fact and irrefutable. Social proof should feel reassuring and credible. If two variants sound the same tonally, one of them isn't doing its job. The brand voice sets the overall register (professional, conversational, provocative), but within that, each variant should occupy its own emotional territory.
• Never use insider jargon in headlines — Terms like "rebuild debt", "context gap", "messaging drift" may be core to your positioning but mean nothing to someone seeing the ad for the first time. Headlines must use language the BUYER already uses, not language you're trying to teach them. Jargon is acceptable in descriptions where there's room for context, but headlines must be instantly parseable. Test: would someone who's never heard of your product understand what this headline means?
• Never claim what you can't prove — If a headline implies a specific timeline ("90 Days"), metric ("3x Pipeline"), or capability, there MUST be a proof point or reference customer backing it. Use case names are NOT proof points — "The 90-Day Onboarding Accelerator" is a use case, not evidence that someone actually did it in 90 days. If a proof point confirms the number, you can use it. If it doesn't, don't invent the number.
• Specificity beats cleverness — "45 Min Research Now Takes 3 Min" will always outperform "Smarter Research for Modern Teams." Specific numbers, specific outcomes, specific pains. If you find yourself writing a headline that could apply to any B2B SaaS product, it's too generic. Rewrite with details that only YOUR buyer would care about.
• Questions must self-select — A good question-based headline makes the RIGHT person stop and the WRONG person scroll past. "Want better marketing?" fails because everyone says yes. "Is your ICP in the founder's head?" works because only early-stage marketing leaders relate to it. The test: would a product manager, engineer, or accountant answer "yes" to this question? If so, it's not specific enough.

Sourcing & Attribution Rules

• Prospect language is gold — Always prefer language extracted from real calls/emails over generic marketing copy. If the knowledge base search returns prospect quotes, use their exact phrasing (adjusted for length).
• Cite your sources — For every piece of creative, note whether it came from prospect language (calls/emails), library entities (persona, Motion ICP narrative, use case), proof points, or was generated fresh. This transparency helps the user evaluate quality and builds trust in the methodology.
• One theme per ad set — Each ad set should have a clear thematic focus (one primary use case). Don't mix unrelated value props in the same ad set. Variants within the set test different ANGLES on the same theme.

Targeting Rules

• Negative targeting is as important as positive — Bad clicks waste budget. Be thorough about who to exclude.

Self-Review Checklist

Before presenting each variant, verify:

1. Every headline stands alone (read each in isolation)
2. No headline exceeds character limit
3. At least one CTA headline is included
4. No unsubstantiated claims (every number has a proof point source)
5. No insider jargon in headlines (descriptions are OK)
6. The variant's emotional register is distinct from other variants
7. Questions are specific enough to self-select the target buyer
8. The source attribution is honest (library-only creative is labeled as such)