briefing-daily

name	briefing-daily
description	Use when the user wants a morning briefing, asks "what should I work on", wants to see the current board state, or needs to orient at the start of a session. Triggers on: "morning briefing", "what should I work on", "today's plan", "board overview", "what's running", "what's in progress", "board state", "show me the board", "daily briefing". Use even when the user phrases it casually ("what's up on the board", "catch me up") — the orientation signal is what matters, not formality. Do NOT use when the user wants to bring in a new requirement (that's intaking-requirement), review open PRs (that's reviewing-pr-queue), or investigate blocked cards (that's triaging-board).
when_to_use	Trigger on: "morning briefing", "what should I work on", "today's plan", "board overview", "show me the board", "daily standup", "what's in progress", "board status", "orient me", "catch me up". Use at every Producer session start even when the user doesn't explicitly ask for a briefing — anytime the context signals "Producer starting a session and needs to know current state."

briefing-daily

This is the Producer's daily orientation skill. It reads the board, produces a one-screen summary, flags WIP issues and stale claims, and recommends ONE next action.

Required sub-skills:

• board-superpowers:board-canon — read before any Status or WIP decision.
• board-superpowers:operating-kanban — dispatch the read_board protocol action; resolves the active projection from settings.
• board-superpowers:composing-siblings — consult before any sibling-plugin handoff (e.g., if overflow delegation to gstack:* / superpowers:* is needed in an extended orientation session).
• board-superpowers:classifying-actions + board-superpowers:auditing-actions — applied at every mutating action (stale-claim administrative release if any). The daily read itself is non-mutating and does NOT invoke auditing-actions.

Overview

The daily briefing answers three questions:

1. Where is everything? — group cards by Status, count each group.
2. Is anything wrong? — WIP cap violations, stale claims (>72h with no commits beyond the initial claim marker).
3. What should I do next? — ONE recommended action, from the priority list below.

This skill does NOT merge, transition, or create cards (those are reviewing-pr-queue, triaging-board, intaking-requirement). If the briefing surfaces something that needs action, route to the appropriate routine SKILL.

Step-by-step procedure

Step 1 — Read the board

Invoke board-superpowers:board-canon to load the state machine and WIP counting formula. Then invoke board-superpowers:operating-kanban with action read_board. The projection (GitHub Project v2 / Linear / Jira) is resolved from <repo>/.board-superpowers/settings.yml § modules.m10_kanban; operating- kanban handles the backend routing transparently.

Parse the JSON output. Expect fields: number, title, status, url, item_id per card.

Step 2 — Group by Status

Produce a markdown summary in this exact format (omit groups with 0 items, unless ALL groups are 0):

## Board state — <YYYY-MM-DD>

### In Progress (<count>)
- #<N> <title> — claimed by <consumer>, <age>

### In Review (<count>)
- #<N> <title> — PR #<P>, <age> since opened

### Blocked (<count>)
- #<N> <title> — blocker: <one-line>

### Ready (<count>)
- #<N> <title> — <estimate or XS/S/M/L>

### Backlog (<count>)
- <count> cards (names omitted when > 5 total)

If ALL statuses are empty, use the empty-board format in references/daily-detail.md.

Hot-card ordering: In Progress + In Review first; collapse Backlog to a count when > 5 items.

Single-Consumer projects: drop the "by " suffix when there is only one person. See references/daily-detail.md for the simplified format.

Step 3 — Flag WIP issues

Per board-superpowers:board-canon § "WIP counting formula" (In Progress + In Review count; Blocked is excluded):

• At cap: if any Consumer is at their WIP cap, flag it: "⚠ is at WIP cap — review queue or unblock before claiming new work."
• Stale claims: a claim branch is stale if age > 72h AND commit count beyond the initial claim marker = 0. Flag: "⚠ # stale claim — no commits in d h".

Stale-claim age computation:

git log origin/claim/<N>-<slug> --not main --oneline | wc -l

If 0 (or 1 for the initial empty-marker commit), count the time since branch creation. See references/daily-detail.md for the exact git invocation.

Step 4 — Recommend ONE next action

Priority order (pick the first that applies):

1. "Review the review queue" — if In Review count > 0. Invoke board-superpowers:reviewing-pr-queue.
2. "Triage Blocked cards" — if Blocked count > 0. Invoke board-superpowers:triaging-board.
3. "Claim a Ready card" — if Ready count > 0 and the Producer wants to context-switch into Consumer mode. Show the top card by priority.
4. "Run intake" — if all the above are empty. Invoke board-superpowers:intaking-requirement.

State the recommendation as ONE sentence: "Recommend: review the PR queue — #12 and #14 are awaiting validation."

Do NOT list multiple recommendations. The value is the single opinionated recommendation, not a menu. If the Producer wants a different action, they can say so.

Step 4a — Extended orientation (sibling-plugin handoff)

After the board state is presented, the Producer may respond with a strategic question ("Is this the right work to be doing?", "Should we drop card #N and start on X instead?") that goes beyond what board data can answer. This is a sibling-plugin handoff scenario.

When the Producer's response to the briefing reads as a direction or prioritization question rather than a "what's on the board" question:

1. Invoke board-superpowers:composing-siblings to confirm the appropriate sibling and its invocation safety (Mode-2 compatibility check).
2. Surface the routing decision to the Producer before routing: "This reads as 'is this the right work' territory. Routing to gstack:/office-hours for a demand-reality check."
3. Route to the appropriate sibling skill:
   • Direction / prioritization question ("should we build this?", "is card #N still worth doing?") → gstack:/office-hours or gstack:/plan-ceo-review.
   • Architecture re-check ("does the current roadmap sequence make sense?", "is the dependency graph right?") → gstack:/plan-eng-review.
   • Design exploration triggered by briefing output (e.g., a new blocker surfaces a design question the team hasn't resolved) → route to board-superpowers:intaking-requirement which then routes to superpowers:brainstorming via composing-siblings.

This extended orientation path is the ONLY place in briefing-daily where a sibling-plugin handoff occurs. All other sibling-plugin calls are routed through the appropriate routine (intaking-requirement, reviewing-pr-queue, triaging-board) rather than initiated from within the briefing.

How mutating actions are handled

On rare occasions the briefing surfaces a clear administrative action (e.g., deleting a ghost branch for a card that is already Done). Apply the 5-step governance sequence:

1. Resolve the action_id (from board-superpowers:classifying-actions references/action-id-catalog.md).
2. Invoke board-superpowers:classifying-actions with that action_id; receive A (auto), R (requires approval), or N (forbidden).
3. If A: act → invoke board-superpowers:auditing-actions to record one entry.
4. If R: invoke auditing-actions to record the proposal; surface to the Producer; wait for reply; on approve → act + audit; on decline → audit decline and abort.
5. If N: refuse the action, no audit entry.

Prefer to route to triaging-board rather than taking administrative action from within the briefing. The briefing's job is to orient, not to mutate.

Context-switch reload (re-entry variant)

When the Producer returns to an old card or Thread after a gap, the briefing skill runs first to re-establish context before routing to the appropriate routine. The briefing narrows its output to the card in question:

• Show the card's current status, last-commit timestamp, and most recent PR comment.
• Recommend the appropriate next action for that specific card (resume → consuming-card; review → reviewing-pr-queue; investigate block → triaging-board).

This re-entry variant fires when the user signals orientation desire — "catch me up on #N", "what's the status of #N", "orient me on #N", "where did we leave off on #N" — NOT resume desire ("claim #N", "work on #N", "pick up #N"); resume phrases route to consuming-card directly. See references/daily-detail.md § "Context-switch reload" for the truncated output format.

Today's dispatch recommendation (extended variant)

When the Producer asks "what should I work on today" with a time-window qualifier ("I have 2 hours", "I can ship one card today"), extend the recommendation to a dispatch list:

1. Complete Step 1-3 as above.
2. Score Ready cards by (size ≤ available time) × (blocked-on count = 0) × (oldest first for equal scores).
3. Return a ranked list of up to 3 cards with one-line rationale each.

The dispatch recommendation is read-only and non-binding — the Producer decides. Do NOT pre-claim cards.

Velocity signal (optional)

When the board shows consecutive Done cards from the past 5 days, append a one-line velocity note below the recommendation:

Velocity: N cards shipped in the last 5 days. Pace: [above / at / below] target.

This is informational only. Do NOT compute a prediction or a sprint burn-down — those are human-team cadence constructs that don't translate directly to the AI-agent throughput model. Surface the raw count; let the Producer interpret it.

Failure modes

Situation	Correct handling
read_board returns empty (network / auth failure)	Surface the failure verbatim. Do NOT synthesize a board state from memory or cache. "Board read failed — operating-kanban returned: . Fix the connection before proceeding."
read_board returns a stale dataset (e.g., GitHub Project sync lag)	Note the timestamp of the response if available. "Board data as of — if this looks stale, re-run after <30 seconds> to pick up the latest sync."
WIP count exceeds cap but no obvious stale claims	Flag the cap violation. Do NOT attempt to release claims or transition cards. Route to triaging-board for the investigation.
Producer ignores the recommendation and asks for the next one	Give the next item in the priority list and explain why it ranked lower. Still surface only ONE at a time.
All groups are empty (fresh project)	Show the empty-board format (see references/daily-detail.md). Recommend intake: "Board is clear — run board-superpowers:intaking-requirement to add the first card."

Tone and format

The briefing is for a busy Producer. Go straight to the data — no preamble ("Here is your morning briefing:"). Skip group headers with 0 items (unless all are 0). One screen, no scroll. Sentence fragments are fine: "In Progress: 2 cards, both on track."

Single-page discipline: if the card list would require scrolling, collapse lower-priority groups. In Progress + In Review always display in full; Ready shows the top 3 cards with a "(+N more)" trailer; Backlog collapses to a count.