ast-grep

name

ast-grep

description

Guide for writing ast-grep rules to perform structural code search and analysis. Use when users need to search codebases using Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) patterns, find specific code structures, or perform complex code queries that go beyond simple text search. This skill should be used when users ask to search for code patterns, find specific language constructs, or locate code with particular structural characteristics.

ast-grep Code Search

Overview

This skill helps translate natural language queries into ast-grep rules for structural code search. ast-grep uses Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) patterns to match code based on its structure rather than just text, enabling powerful and precise code search across large codebases.

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when users:

• Need to search for code patterns using structural matching (e.g., "find all async functions that don't have error handling")
• Want to locate specific language constructs (e.g., "find all function calls with specific parameters")
• Request searches that require understanding code structure rather than just text
• Ask to search for code with particular AST characteristics
• Need to perform complex code queries that traditional text search cannot handle

General Workflow

Follow this process to help users write effective ast-grep rules:

Step 1: Understand the Query

Clearly understand what the user wants to find. Ask clarifying questions if needed:

• What specific code pattern or structure are they looking for?
• Which programming language?
• Are there specific edge cases or variations to consider?
• What should be included or excluded from matches?

Before writing a rule, restate the query as a testable assumption and verify it with the user when scope is ambiguous.

Required restatement template:

• Scope: <repo/path or package>
• Language: <go|ts|...>
• Match shape: <AST structure>
• Exclusions: <what must not match>

If the request comes from a code-review comment, extract and confirm:

1. Exact file path(s)
2. Target line range (if provided)
3. Whether the user wants one location fixed or all similar patterns in the codebase

Step 2: Create Example Code

Write a simple code snippet that represents what the user wants to match. Save this to a temporary file for testing.

Example: If searching for "async functions that use await", create a test file:

// test_example.js
async function example() {
  const result = await fetchData();
  return result;
}

Step 3: Write the ast-grep Rule

Translate the pattern into an ast-grep rule. Start simple and add complexity as needed.

Key principles:

• Always use stopBy: end for relational rules (inside, has) to ensure search goes to the end of the direction
• Use pattern for simple structures
• Use kind with has/inside for complex structures
• Break complex queries into smaller sub-rules using all, any, or not

Example rule file (test_rule.yml):

id: async-with-await
language: javascript
rule:
  kind: function_declaration
  has:
    pattern: await $EXPR
    stopBy: end

See references/rule_reference.md for comprehensive rule documentation.

Step 4: Test the Rule

Use ast-grep CLI to verify the rule matches the example code. There are two main approaches:

Option A: Test with inline rules (for quick iterations)

echo "async function test() { await fetch(); }" | ast-grep scan --inline-rules "id: test
language: javascript
rule:
  kind: function_declaration
  has:
    pattern: await \$EXPR
    stopBy: end" --stdin

Option B: Test with rule files (recommended for complex rules)

ast-grep scan --rule test_rule.yml test_example.js

Debugging if no matches:

1. Simplify the rule (remove sub-rules)
2. Add stopBy: end to relational rules if not present
3. Use --debug-query to understand the AST structure (see below)
4. Check if kind values are correct for the language

Step 5: Search the Codebase

Once the rule matches the example code correctly, search the actual codebase:

For simple pattern searches:

ast-grep run --pattern 'console.log($ARG)' --lang javascript /path/to/project

For complex rule-based searches:

ast-grep scan --rule my_rule.yml /path/to/project

For inline rules (without creating files):

ast-grep scan --inline-rules "id: my-rule
language: javascript
rule:
  pattern: \$PATTERN" /path/to/project

ast-grep CLI Commands

Inspect Code Structure (--debug-query)

Dump the AST structure to understand how code is parsed:

ast-grep run --pattern 'async function example() { await fetch(); }' \
  --lang javascript \
  --debug-query=cst

Available formats:

• cst: Concrete Syntax Tree (shows all nodes including punctuation)
• ast: Abstract Syntax Tree (shows only named nodes)
• pattern: Shows how ast-grep interprets your pattern

Use this to:

• Find the correct kind values for nodes
• Understand the structure of code you want to match
• Debug why patterns aren't matching

Example:

# See the structure of your target code
ast-grep run --pattern 'class User { constructor() {} }' \
  --lang javascript \
  --debug-query=cst

# See how ast-grep interprets your pattern
ast-grep run --pattern 'class $NAME { $$$BODY }' \
  --lang javascript \
  --debug-query=pattern

Test Rules (scan with --stdin)

Test a rule against code snippet without creating files:

echo "const x = await fetch();" | ast-grep scan --inline-rules "id: test
language: javascript
rule:
  pattern: await \$EXPR" --stdin

Add --json for structured output:

echo "const x = await fetch();" | ast-grep scan --inline-rules "..." --stdin --json

Search with Patterns (run)

Simple pattern-based search for single AST node matches:

# Basic pattern search
ast-grep run --pattern 'console.log($ARG)' --lang javascript .

# Search specific files
ast-grep run --pattern 'class $NAME' --lang python /path/to/project

# JSON output for programmatic use
ast-grep run --pattern 'function $NAME($$$)' --lang javascript --json .

When to use:

• Simple, single-node matches
• Quick searches without complex logic
• When you don't need relational rules (inside/has)

Search with Rules (scan)

YAML rule-based search for complex structural queries:

# With rule file
ast-grep scan --rule my_rule.yml /path/to/project

# With inline rules
ast-grep scan --inline-rules "id: find-async
language: javascript
rule:
  kind: function_declaration
  has:
    pattern: await \$EXPR
    stopBy: end" /path/to/project

# JSON output
ast-grep scan --rule my_rule.yml --json /path/to/project

When to use:

• Complex structural searches
• Relational rules (inside, has, precedes, follows)
• Composite logic (all, any, not)
• When you need the power of full YAML rules

Tip: For relational rules (inside/has), always add stopBy: end to ensure complete traversal.

Tips for Writing Effective Rules

Always Use stopBy: end

For relational rules, always use stopBy: end unless there's a specific reason not to:

has:
  pattern: await $EXPR
  stopBy: end

This ensures the search traverses the entire subtree rather than stopping at the first non-matching node.

Start Simple, Then Add Complexity

Begin with the simplest rule that could work:

1. Try a pattern first
2. If that doesn't work, try kind to match the node type
3. Add relational rules (has, inside) as needed
4. Combine with composite rules (all, any, not) for complex logic

Use the Right Rule Type

• Pattern: For simple, direct code matching (e.g., console.log($ARG))
• Kind + Relational: For complex structures (e.g., "function containing await")
• Composite: For logical combinations (e.g., "function with await but not in try-catch")

Debug with AST Inspection

When rules don't match:

1. Use --debug-query=cst to see the actual AST structure
2. Check if metavariables are being detected correctly
3. Verify the node kind matches what you expect
4. Ensure relational rules are searching in the right direction

Escaping in Inline Rules

When using --inline-rules, escape metavariables in shell commands:

• Use \$VAR instead of $VAR (shell interprets $ as variable)
• Or use single quotes: '$VAR' works in most shells

Example:

# Correct: escaped $
ast-grep scan --inline-rules "rule: {pattern: 'console.log(\$ARG)'}" .

# Or use single quotes
ast-grep scan --inline-rules 'rule: {pattern: "console.log($ARG)"}' .

Common Use Cases

Go: Find functions that take both context and tx

Use this pattern when the request is: "find places where tx and ctx are function parameters together".

ast-grep scan --inline-rules "id: go-ctx-tx-params
language: go
rule:
  kind: function_declaration
  has:
    kind: parameter_list
    all:
      - has:
          pattern: \$CTX context.Context
          stopBy: end
      - has:
          regex: '(?i)\\btx\\b'
          stopBy: end
    stopBy: end" /path/to/repo

Then narrow scope to controller paths (for example controllers/workflow/) and inspect exact matches.

Find Functions with Specific Content

Find async functions that use await:

ast-grep scan --inline-rules "id: async-await
language: javascript
rule:
  all:
    - kind: function_declaration
    - has:
        pattern: await \$EXPR
        stopBy: end" /path/to/project

Find Code Inside Specific Contexts

Find console.log inside class methods:

ast-grep scan --inline-rules "id: console-in-class
language: javascript
rule:
  pattern: console.log(\$\$\$)
  inside:
    kind: method_definition
    stopBy: end" /path/to/project

Find Code Missing Expected Patterns

Find async functions without try-catch:

ast-grep scan --inline-rules "id: async-no-trycatch
language: javascript
rule:
  all:
    - kind: function_declaration
    - has:
        pattern: await \$EXPR
        stopBy: end
    - not:
        has:
          pattern: try { \$\$\$ } catch (\$E) { \$\$\$ }
          stopBy: end" /path/to/project

Resources

references/

Contains detailed documentation for ast-grep rule syntax:

• rule_reference.md: Comprehensive ast-grep rule documentation covering atomic rules, relational rules, composite rules, and metavariables

Load these references when detailed rule syntax information is needed.

Autoresearch rules

Eval checklist:

1. Did the rule match the target code pattern correctly (zero false negatives on the test example)?
2. Were there zero false positives (rule didn't match unintended code)?
3. Was stopBy: end included in all relational rules (has/inside)?
4. Did the agent test the rule against example code before searching the full codebase?

Test inputs:

• "Find all async functions that use await but don't have try-catch"
• "Find all Go functions that return error but don't wrap it"
• "Find all React components that use useState without useEffect cleanup"

Can change: rule writing workflow, debugging steps, CLI command examples, common use cases Cannot change: test-before-search requirement, YAML rule format, ast-grep CLI as the tool Min sessions before eval: 5 Runs per experiment: 3