菜单
Evaluates whether a proposed idea addresses a genuine user problem worth solving. Use when assessing new feature ideas, startup concepts, or vague user complaints to determine if the pain justifies building a solution.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Exposes hidden risks by identifying and ranking assumptions across desirability, feasibility, and viability categories. Use when evaluating new products or features to surface the highest-risk assumption to test first.
Designs fast, reliable validation experiments with hypothesis, method, success metric, and decision rules (Ship/Iterate/Kill). Use when you need to validate an assumption or test a product hypothesis before committing resources.
Analyzes why a shipped feature is or isn't being used, covering adoption metrics, barriers, user feedback signals, and recommended actions. Use after launching a feature to diagnose adoption issues.
Translates feature ideas into Jobs-to-Be-Done format with functional and emotional jobs, success criteria, and switching triggers. Use when reframing feature requests to understand the underlying user motivation.
Audits whether a feature or product is truly ready for launch with a structured checklist and readiness status (Ready/At Risk/Not Ready). Use before any product launch to catch critical gaps.
Shifts thinking from feature delivery to measurable user or business outcomes. Use before building a feature, during roadmap planning, or while defining success metrics to ensure work ties to real results.
| name | problem-clarity |
| description | Evaluates whether a proposed idea addresses a genuine user problem worth solving. Use when assessing new feature ideas, startup concepts, or vague user complaints to determine if the pain justifies building a solution. |
Determine whether a proposed idea represents a real, meaningful user problem worth solving.
High / Medium / Low
Worth Solving / Not Worth Solving
See worked example for a complete scenario.
