一键导入
security-testing
Test for security vulnerabilities using OWASP principles. Use when conducting security audits, testing auth, or implementing security practices.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
菜单
Test for security vulnerabilities using OWASP principles. Use when conducting security audits, testing auth, or implementing security practices.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
WCAG 2.2 compliance testing, screen reader validation, and inclusive design verification. Use when ensuring legal compliance (ADA, Section 508), testing for disabilities, or building accessible applications for 1 billion disabled users globally.
AI agents as force multipliers for quality work. Core skill for all 19 QE agents using PACT principles.
Comprehensive API testing patterns including contract testing, REST/GraphQL testing, and integration testing. Use when testing APIs or designing API test strategies.
Unvarnished technical criticism combining Linus Torvalds' precision, Gordon Ramsay's standards, and James Bach's BS-detection. Use when code/tests need harsh reality checks, certification schemes smell fishy, or technical decisions lack rigor. No sugar-coating, just surgical truth about what's broken and why.
Write high-quality bug reports that get fixed quickly. Use when reporting bugs, training teams on bug reporting, or establishing bug report standards.
Chaos engineering principles, controlled failure injection, resilience testing, and system recovery validation. Use when testing distributed systems, building confidence in fault tolerance, or validating disaster recovery.
| name | security-testing |
| description | Test for security vulnerabilities using OWASP principles. Use when conducting security audits, testing auth, or implementing security practices. |
| category | specialized-testing |
| priority | critical |
| tokenEstimate | 1200 |
| agents | ["qe-security-scanner","qe-api-contract-validator","qe-quality-analyzer"] |
| implementation_status | optimized |
| optimization_version | 1 |
| last_optimized | "2025-12-02T00:00:00.000Z" |
| dependencies | [] |
| quick_reference_card | true |
| tags | ["security","owasp","sast","dast","vulnerabilities","auth","injection"] |
<default_to_action> When testing security or conducting audits:
Quick Security Checks:
Critical Success Factors:
| # | Vulnerability | Key Test |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Broken Access Control | User A accessing User B's data |
| 2 | Cryptographic Failures | Plaintext passwords, HTTP |
| 3 | Injection | SQL/XSS/command injection |
| 4 | Insecure Design | Rate limiting, session timeout |
| 5 | Security Misconfiguration | Verbose errors, exposed /admin |
| 6 | Vulnerable Components | npm audit, outdated packages |
| 7 | Auth Failures | Weak passwords, no MFA |
| 8 | Integrity Failures | Unsigned updates, malware |
| 9 | Logging Failures | No audit trail for breaches |
| 10 | SSRF | Server fetching internal URLs |
| Type | Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| SAST | SonarQube, Semgrep | Static code analysis |
| DAST | OWASP ZAP, Burp | Dynamic scanning |
| Deps | npm audit, Snyk | Dependency vulnerabilities |
| Secrets | git-secrets, TruffleHog | Secret scanning |
qe-security-scanner: Multi-layer SAST/DAST scanningqe-api-contract-validator: API security testingqe-quality-analyzer: Security code review// Horizontal escalation - User A accessing User B's data
test('user cannot access another user\'s order', async () => {
const userAToken = await login('userA');
const userBOrder = await createOrder('userB');
const response = await api.get(`/orders/${userBOrder.id}`, {
headers: { Authorization: `Bearer ${userAToken}` }
});
expect(response.status).toBe(403);
});
// Vertical escalation - Regular user accessing admin
test('regular user cannot access admin', async () => {
const userToken = await login('regularUser');
expect((await api.get('/admin/users', {
headers: { Authorization: `Bearer ${userToken}` }
})).status).toBe(403);
});
// SQL Injection
test('prevents SQL injection', async () => {
const malicious = "' OR '1'='1";
const response = await api.get(`/products?search=${malicious}`);
expect(response.body.length).toBeLessThan(100); // Not all products
});
// XSS
test('sanitizes HTML output', async () => {
const xss = '<script>alert("XSS")</script>';
await api.post('/comments', { text: xss });
const html = (await api.get('/comments')).body;
expect(html).toContain('<script>');
expect(html).not.toContain('<script>');
});
test('passwords are hashed', async () => {
await db.users.create({ email: 'test@example.com', password: 'MyPassword123' });
const user = await db.users.findByEmail('test@example.com');
expect(user.password).not.toBe('MyPassword123');
expect(user.password).toMatch(/^\$2[aby]\$\d{2}\$/); // bcrypt
});
test('no sensitive data in API response', async () => {
const response = await api.get('/users/me');
expect(response.body).not.toHaveProperty('password');
expect(response.body).not.toHaveProperty('ssn');
});
test('errors don\'t leak sensitive info', async () => {
const response = await api.post('/login', { email: 'nonexistent@test.com', password: 'wrong' });
expect(response.body.error).toBe('Invalid credentials'); // Generic message
});
test('sensitive endpoints not exposed', async () => {
const endpoints = ['/debug', '/.env', '/.git', '/admin'];
for (let ep of endpoints) {
expect((await fetch(`https://example.com${ep}`)).status).not.toBe(200);
}
});
test('rate limiting prevents brute force', async () => {
const responses = [];
for (let i = 0; i < 20; i++) {
responses.push(await api.post('/login', { email: 'test@example.com', password: 'wrong' }));
}
expect(responses.filter(r => r.status === 429).length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
});
# GitHub Actions
security-checks:
steps:
- name: Dependency audit
run: npm audit --audit-level=high
- name: SAST scan
run: npm run sast
- name: Secret scan
uses: trufflesecurity/trufflehog@main
- name: DAST scan
if: github.ref == 'refs/heads/main'
run: docker run owasp/zap2docker-stable zap-baseline.py -t https://staging.example.com
Pre-commit hooks:
#!/bin/sh
git-secrets --scan
npm run lint:security
// Comprehensive multi-layer scan
await Task("Security Scan", {
target: 'src/',
layers: { sast: true, dast: true, dependencies: true, secrets: true },
severity: ['critical', 'high', 'medium']
}, "qe-security-scanner");
// OWASP Top 10 testing
await Task("OWASP Scan", {
categories: ['broken-access-control', 'injection', 'cryptographic-failures'],
depth: 'comprehensive'
}, "qe-security-scanner");
// Validate fix
await Task("Validate Fix", {
vulnerability: 'CVE-2024-12345',
expectedResolution: 'upgrade package to v2.0.0',
retestAfterFix: true
}, "qe-security-scanner");
aqe/security/
├── scans/* - Scan results
├── vulnerabilities/* - Found vulnerabilities
├── fixes/* - Remediation tracking
└── compliance/* - Compliance status
const securityFleet = await FleetManager.coordinate({
strategy: 'security-testing',
agents: [
'qe-security-scanner',
'qe-api-contract-validator',
'qe-quality-analyzer',
'qe-deployment-readiness'
],
topology: 'parallel'
});
Hiding admin at /super-secret-admin → Use proper auth
JavaScript validation can be bypassed → Always validate server-side
Assuming input is safe → Sanitize, validate, escape all input
API keys in code → Environment variables, secret management
Think like an attacker: What would you try to break? Test that. Build like a defender: Assume input is malicious until proven otherwise. Test continuously: Security testing is ongoing, not one-time.
With Agents: Agents automate vulnerability scanning, track remediation, and validate fixes. Use agents to maintain security posture at scale.