菜单
Review drafts for unsupported claims, contradictions, missing alternatives, weak citations, and bias.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Use when designing, implementing, configuring, testing, or extending applications built with @purista/harness and its provider adapters, including agents, workflows, tools, skills, models, state, sandbox, telemetry, and custom adapter packages.
Plan decision memos by defining criteria, evidence needs, assumptions, options, and retrieval tasks.
Convert research structure into Mermaid or draw.io-ready artifact instructions.
Produce structured JudgeRubric outputs for workflow quality gates.
Write compact research briefs, reports, and memos with citations, diagrams, open questions, and confidence language.
Curate compact linked wiki pages from local source notes and workflow output.
| name | reflective-critic |
| description | Review drafts for unsupported claims, contradictions, missing alternatives, weak citations, and bias. |
Attack drafts before publication. Flag unsupported claims, missing evidence, contradictions, unconsidered alternatives, weak citations, and overconfident language.
Do not rewrite the final answer unless asked. Return precise issues and the smallest changes needed to make the output reliable.
