| name | execution-strategies |
| description | Reference guide for three development execution strategies: TDD, Steel Thread, and Core-then-Integrate. Load this when you need strategy definitions, selection criteria, execution phases, test pyramid guidance, contribution folder naming patterns, or help choosing a strategy. Referenced during dev-strategy planning and dev-contribute execution. |
Execution Strategies
Canonical reference for the three development execution strategies used across the dev-strategy workflow skills.
What This Skill Contains
- Definitions and selection criteria for TDD, Steel Thread, and Core-then-Integrate
- Execution phases and contribution sequences for each strategy
- Test pyramid guidance
- Contribution folder naming patterns per strategy
Strategy Overview
Test-Driven Development (TDD)
Write sufficient tests first, then implement code to pass those tests.
Best for: Clear requirements, small-medium features, well-defined business rules
Contribution sequence:
- Test Designer → creates failing tests
- Test Validator → validates coverage and edge cases
- Implementation Agent → writes minimal code to pass tests
Folder pattern:
001-phase-X-test-design-tdd-[agent]
002-phase-X-test-validation-tdd-[agent]
003-phase-X-implementation-code-[agent]
Steel Thread
Build the thinnest viable end-to-end working version first, then expand capabilities while keeping the system functional.
Best for: Uncertain requirements, multiple integration points, need early feedback
Key requirement: Each phase must clearly articulate the specific end-to-end path being built. Every phase maintains a fully functional system.
Contribution sequence:
- Pathfinder → maps minimal viable path
- Foundation Builder → implements basic working flow
- Capability Expander → adds features iteratively
Folder pattern:
001-phase-X-pathfinder-steel-thread-[agent]
002-phase-X-foundation-steel-thread-[agent]
003-phase-X-expansion-capability-[agent]
004-phase-X-expansion-capability-[agent]
Core-then-Integrate
Build pure business logic first, then add external integrations layer by layer.
Best for: Complex business rules, clean architecture goals, heavy external dependencies
Contribution sequence:
- Domain Modeler → pure business logic with unit tests
- Port Designer → interface contracts and integration points
- Adapter Builder → external system integrations
- Integration Orchestrator → wires everything together
Folder pattern:
001-phase-X-domain-logic-core-[agent]
002-phase-X-port-design-core-[agent]
003-phase-X-adapter-database-[agent]
004-phase-X-adapter-api-[agent]
005-phase-X-integration-orchestrator-[agent]
Strategy Selection Guide
| Signal | Recommended Strategy |
|---|
| Clear requirements, small-medium feature | TDD |
| Uncertain requirements, need feedback | Steel Thread |
| Complex business rules, clean architecture | Core-then-Integrate |
| Multiple external integrations | Core-then-Integrate |
| User-facing feature with unknown flow | Steel Thread |
Apply Last Responsible Moment: Don't commit to complex approaches without evidence they're needed.
Detailed References
- TDD — Phases, test pyramid, contribution sequence detail
- Steel Thread — Loop structure, JIT refactor guidelines
- Core-then-Integrate — Domain → Port → Adapter → Integration phases
