一键导入
prompt-engineering
Prompt engineering patterns including structured prompts, chain-of-thought, few-shot learning, and system prompt design
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
菜单
Prompt engineering patterns including structured prompts, chain-of-thought, few-shot learning, and system prompt design
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Route broad or ambiguous AgentKit SEO work to the right module while keeping context scoped. Use when a request spans multiple surfaces, asks for overall digital-presence strategy, involves provider or install architecture, needs agent-context planning, or the correct platform skill is unclear.
Persistent memory system for Claude Code. Two-layer architecture (hot cache + knowledge wiki), safety hooks, /close-day end-of-day synthesis. Zero external dependencies.
Claude-native deep research using DAG-based query planning, parallel subagent execution, and gap-driven iteration. No external API needed.
Web accessibility patterns for WCAG 2.2 compliance including ARIA, keyboard navigation, screen readers, and testing
Authentication and authorization patterns including OAuth2, JWT, RBAC, session management, and PKCE flows
AWS cloud patterns for Lambda, ECS, S3, DynamoDB, and Infrastructure as Code with CDK/Terraform
| name | prompt-engineering |
| description | Prompt engineering patterns including structured prompts, chain-of-thought, few-shot learning, and system prompt design |
You are a senior code reviewer. Your role is to analyze pull requests for:
1. Correctness - logic errors, edge cases, off-by-one errors
2. Security - injection, authentication, data exposure
3. Performance - N+1 queries, unnecessary allocations, missing indexes
4. Maintainability - naming, complexity, test coverage
For each issue found, respond with:
- Severity: critical | warning | suggestion
- File and line reference
- What is wrong
- How to fix it (with code snippet)
If the code is well-written, say so briefly. Do not invent problems.
Structure system prompts with role, scope, output format, and constraints. Be explicit about what the model should NOT do.
Analyze this database query for performance issues.
Think step by step:
1. Identify the tables and joins involved
2. Check if appropriate indexes exist for the WHERE and JOIN conditions
3. Look for full table scans or cartesian products
4. Estimate the row count at each step
5. Suggest specific index creation or query restructuring
Query:
SELECT o.*, u.name, p.title
FROM orders o
JOIN users u ON o.user_id = u.id
JOIN products p ON o.product_id = p.id
WHERE o.created_at > '2024-01-01'
AND u.country = 'US'
ORDER BY o.created_at DESC
LIMIT 50;
Chain-of-thought prompting improves accuracy on reasoning tasks by forcing the model to show intermediate steps.
Convert natural language to SQL. Follow these examples:
Input: "How many orders were placed last month?"
Output: SELECT COUNT(*) FROM orders WHERE created_at >= DATE_TRUNC('month', CURRENT_DATE - INTERVAL '1 month') AND created_at < DATE_TRUNC('month', CURRENT_DATE);
Input: "Top 5 customers by total spending"
Output: SELECT customer_id, SUM(total_amount) AS total_spent FROM orders GROUP BY customer_id ORDER BY total_spent DESC LIMIT 5;
Input: "Products that have never been ordered"
Output: SELECT p.* FROM products p LEFT JOIN order_items oi ON p.id = oi.product_id WHERE oi.id IS NULL;
Now convert:
Input: "Average order value per country for the last quarter"
Provide 3-5 diverse examples that demonstrate the expected format and edge cases.
{
"tools": [
{
"name": "search_codebase",
"description": "Search for code patterns across the repository. Use when you need to find implementations, usages, or definitions.",
"parameters": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"query": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Regex pattern or keyword to search for"
},
"file_type": {
"type": "string",
"description": "File extension filter (e.g., 'ts', 'py')"
}
},
"required": ["query"]
}
}
]
}
Write tool descriptions that explain WHEN to use the tool, not just what it does.
def build_review_prompt(diff: str, context: str, rules: list[str]) -> str:
rules_text = "\n".join(f"- {rule}" for rule in rules)
return f"""Review this code diff against the following rules:
{rules_text}
Context about the codebase:
{context}
Diff to review:
{diff}
Respond with a JSON array of findings. If no issues, return an empty array.
Each finding: {{"severity": "critical|warning|info", "line": number, "message": "string", "suggestion": "string"}}"""