resolve-feedback

name	resolve-feedback
description	Resolves unresolved pull request review threads on the current branch, folds each fix into the existing commit that last touched the same file, force-pushes with lease, and requests a fresh Copilot review. Use when addressing PR feedback, resolving review comments or threads, amending fixes into prior commits, or asking Copilot to re-review after changes.

Resolve Feedback

Address the unresolved review threads on the pull request for the current branch, folding each fix into the existing commit that last touched the affected file, then force-push and request another Copilot review.

Contents

• Contents
• How to use this skill
• Related skills
• Prerequisites
• Terms
• Safety and stop points
• Workflow
• Step 1: Identify the PR and branch
• Step 2: Fetch unresolved review threads
• Step 3: Triage each thread
• Step 4: Implement the changes
• Step 5: Fold each change into the matching commit
• Step 6: Force-push the branch
• Step 7: Reply to and resolve threads
• Step 8: Request another Copilot review
• Troubleshooting

How to use this skill

Attach this file to your Copilot Chat context and invoke it when a PR has review feedback to address on the current branch. Work top to bottom. Stop and ask the user whenever a thread needs a clarification or decision (Step 3) and before the history-rewriting force-push (Step 6).

Related skills

• Pull Request Review — the review workflow that produces the threads this skill resolves
• PR Readiness Review — pre-PR quality gate to run before pushing follow-up changes
• Development Workflow — TDD process and branch rules that govern the fixes made here

Prerequisites

• The gh CLI is installed and authenticated (gh auth status).
• The current branch has an open PR and is a topic branch (not main or 4.x).
• The working tree has no unrelated uncommitted changes before starting.

Terms

• Unresolved review thread — a PR review thread whose isResolved is false in the GitHub GraphQL API.
• Base — the merge-base between the PR base branch and HEAD, computed with git merge-base origin/<base-branch> HEAD. All commit lookups are scoped to <base>..HEAD so only this branch's commits are considered.
• Target commit — the newest commit in <base>..HEAD that last touched the file a fix applies to. Each fix is folded into its target commit.

Safety and stop points

These rules are mandatory:

• Never rewrite history on main or 4.x. Confirm the branch first with git branch --show-current.
• Stop and ask the user whenever a thread requests a clarification or decision (Step 3). Do not guess on ambiguous feedback.
• Force-push only with --force-with-lease, and only after the user confirms (Step 6).
• Do not resolve a thread until its fix is committed and pushed (Step 7).

Workflow

1. Identify the PR and branch
2. Fetch unresolved review threads
3. Triage each thread — ask for clarifications or decisions as needed
4. Implement the changes
5. Fold each change into the matching commit
6. Force-push the branch
7. Reply to and resolve threads
8. Request another Copilot review

Step 1: Identify the PR and branch

Confirm the branch and locate the PR for it:

git branch --show-current
gh pr view --json number,title,headRefName,baseRefName,url,state

Record the PR number, baseRefName (the base branch), and URL. If no PR is associated with the branch, stop and tell the user.

Step 2: Fetch unresolved review threads

List the first 100 review threads and keep the ones where isResolved is false. For unusually active PRs with more than 100 review threads, paginate before assuming no unresolved threads remain.

OWNER=$(gh repo view --json owner --jq '.owner.login')
REPO=$(gh repo view --json name --jq '.name')
PR_NUMBER=$(gh pr view --json number --jq '.number')

gh api graphql -f query='
  query($owner:String!, $repo:String!, $pr:Int!) {
    repository(owner:$owner, name:$repo) {
      pullRequest(number:$pr) {
        reviewThreads(first:100) {
          nodes {
            id
            isResolved
            isOutdated
            path
            line
            comments(first:30) {
              nodes { databaseId author { login } body }
            }
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }' -F owner="$OWNER" -F repo="$REPO" -F pr="$PR_NUMBER" \
  --jq '.data.repository.pullRequest.reviewThreads.nodes[] | select(.isResolved == false)'

For each unresolved thread, note its id (thread ID, needed to resolve it), the first comment databaseId (needed to reply), the path, and the line.

Step 3: Triage each thread

For each unresolved thread, classify it and act:

• Actionable and unambiguous → plan the concrete code or doc change.
• Needs a clarification or decision → stop and ask the user. Present the thread's file, line, and comment text, and the specific question or the options you see. Wait for the answer before implementing.
• Not applicable / disagree → do not change code; draft a short, respectful reply explaining why (used in Step 7). Ask the user if you are unsure whether to push back.

Do not proceed to Step 4 for a thread until its resolution is clear.

Step 4: Implement the changes

Apply the agreed changes in the workspace. Keep edits for each thread minimal and scoped to what the feedback asks. If the project has tests or linters, run the relevant checks before folding changes into commits:

bundle exec rake default

Fix any failures before continuing.

Step 5: Fold each change into the matching commit

Amend each change into its target commit — the existing commit on this branch that last touched the file — instead of adding new follow-up commits.

1. Compute the base once:

   BASE=$(git merge-base origin/<base-branch> HEAD)
   

2. For each changed file, find its target commit (the topmost line is newest):

   git log --oneline "$BASE"..HEAD -- <path>
   

3. Stage that file and create a fixup commit aimed at its target SHA:

   git add <path>
   git commit --fixup=<target-sha>
   

   Repeat for each changed file. When several files share the same target commit, stage them together for one fixup.

4. Autosquash the fixups into their targets non-interactively:

   GIT_SEQUENCE_EDITOR=: git rebase -i --autosquash "$BASE"
   

5. Verify the result — the fixup commits should be gone and history should be clean:

   git --no-pager log --oneline "$BASE"..HEAD
   git status --short --branch
   

If a change does not correspond to any existing commit (e.g. a brand-new file requested in review), ask the user whether to fold it into a related commit or add a new, conventionally formatted commit.

Step 6: Force-push the branch

History was rewritten, so the branch must be force-pushed. This is a history-rewriting operation — confirm with the user first, then use a lease to avoid clobbering unseen remote commits:

git push --force-with-lease

If the push is rejected, someone updated the remote branch. Fetch and reconcile before retrying; do not use --force to override the lease.

Step 7: Reply to and resolve threads

For each thread that is now addressed:

1. Reply to the thread, referencing what changed. Keep reply bodies shell-safe: use single quotes for simple one-line replies, or assign a quoted heredoc to a variable for arbitrary text. Do not put human-written reply text directly in a double-quoted shell argument; review comments can contain characters such as !, $, backticks, or quotes that the shell may expand before gh runs.

COMMENT_DATABASE_ID=COMMENT_DATABASE_ID_FROM_THREAD
reply_body='Addressed in the latest push: <short summary>.'

gh api \
  "repos/$OWNER/$REPO/pulls/$PR_NUMBER/comments/$COMMENT_DATABASE_ID/replies" \
  -f body="$reply_body"

For multi-line replies or text that may contain shell metacharacters, use a single-quoted heredoc delimiter:

COMMENT_DATABASE_ID=COMMENT_DATABASE_ID_FROM_THREAD
reply_body=$(cat <<'EOF'
Addressed in the latest push: the guidance now covers `@!method` declarations.
EOF
)

gh api \
  "repos/$OWNER/$REPO/pulls/$PR_NUMBER/comments/$COMMENT_DATABASE_ID/replies" \
  -f body="$reply_body"

2. Resolve the thread:

   gh api graphql -f query='
     mutation($threadId:ID!) {
       resolveReviewThread(input:{threadId:$threadId}) {
         thread { id isResolved }
       }
     }' -F threadId=THREAD_ID
   

Only resolve threads whose feedback was actually addressed (or that the user agreed to close after a reply). Leave threads open when the user still owes a decision.

Step 8: Request another Copilot review

Request a fresh Copilot review on the PR so it re-reviews the amended commits.

• Preferred: activate the pull request management tools, then request a Copilot review via the GitHub pull request tooling (request_copilot_review).
• Do not create a new Copilot PR task for a re-review; that opens separate work instead of re-reviewing this PR.

Finish by reporting to the user: the threads resolved, any threads left open and why, the new commit list, and the PR URL.

Troubleshooting

Issue	Solution
git log "$BASE"..HEAD -- <path> is empty	The file is new on this branch; ask the user whether to fold into a related commit or add a new commit.
Rebase stops with conflicts	Resolve the conflict, git add the files, then git rebase --continue.
Force-push rejected despite --force-with-lease	The remote branch moved; run git fetch, review the remote changes, reconcile, and retry.
A thread has no obvious file/line (path is null)	It is a PR-level comment; reply at the PR level and resolve only if addressed.
Unsure whether to push back on feedback	Stop and ask the user before replying or resolving.