一键在 Manus 中运行任何 Skill

pmstack-competitive

星标8

分支1

更新时间2026年4月25日 04:30

Generate a structured competitive landscape analysis for a market or product category. Use when a PM mentions "competitive analysis", "market positioning", "white space", "where do we wedge in", asks who else is in a space, or wants to size up rivals before strategy/launch. Focus is on market positioning (audience, value prop, white space) — for feature-by-feature parity, use pmstack-compare instead.

安装

用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。

在 Manus 中运行

来源

RyanAlberts

RyanAlberts/pmstack

打开 GitHub 仓库查看创作者相关仓库

下载

在 Manus 中运行

Competitive Landscape Analysis

Produce a comparative analysis of 3–5 real competitors and identify white space.

Required structure

For each competitor:

Target audience
Core value proposition
Key strengths
Key weaknesses / gaps
Pricing model (if known)
Recent moves in the last 12 months

Then synthesize:

White Space — concrete wedge a new entrant could exploit (not "better UX")
What I'd want to validate — the 3 biggest assumptions in the analysis

Hard rules

Only name competitors you are confident exist. If you're not sure, say so explicitly. Do not fabricate.
Cite source URLs for factual claims.
Use a markdown table for the comparison matrix — same dimensions across competitors.
Hedge appropriately for facts you couldn't fully verify.

Where to write

With filesystem: outputs/competitive-<market-slug>-<YYYY-MM-DD>.md
Inline (web/mobile): emit as markdown with the suggested filename

Tone

Objective, analytical, direct. No marketing fluff.

同仓库更多 Skills

同仓库

pmstack-eval-report

RyanAlberts/pmstack

Turns a /run-eval result into a single self-contained, shareable HTML report — a verdict hero (pass/conditional/fail), the per-case table with PASS/FAIL color-coding, and the metrics table — that a PM can paste into Slack, a launch doc, LinkedIn, or a PR. The report carries a "run your own eval" backlink to pmstack. Use when the user says "make this eval shareable," "turn my eval run into a report," "export the eval results," "an HTML report of my eval," "share my eval results," or has a /run-eval output directory and wants a presentable artifact. Renders real run data only (from summary.md) — never invents numbers. Runs bin/eval-report.py on a run directory. Output: report.html next to the run's summary.md.

2026-06-248

pmstack-eval-grade

RyanAlberts/pmstack

Grades an eval the user already has against Anthropic's eval-design principles and returns an Eval Report Card — a letter grade A–F, the failures that earned it with the offending line, the single highest-leverage fix, and a shareable verdict card. It is the inverse of /eval (which writes a suite); this checks whether a suite is any good. Use when the user says "grade my eval," "is my eval any good," "review my eval suite," "roast my eval," "what's wrong with this eval," "did I write this eval right," pastes an eval YAML or rubric and asks for feedback, or wants to check an eval against the Anthropic framework before trusting it. Catches grader leakage, missing negative cases, no target, vibes-as-metric, and uncalibrated LLM-as-judge. Accepts a file path, a pasted/attached eval, or a plain-English success metric. Output: outputs/eval-grade-<feature>-<date>.md.

2026-06-208

pmstack-voc

RyanAlberts/pmstack

Synthesize many raw customer signals (support tickets, interview snippets, churn reasons, sales notes, NPS verbatims, app reviews) into a small set of ranked, PRD-ready problems. Use when a PM pastes or attaches a pile of feedback and asks "what's the real problem / what should we build first / what are the themes", when there are too many signals to read one by one, or when someone needs to turn voice-of-customer data into prioritized problem statements before writing a PRD. This is the front-of-funnel step that precedes pmstack-prd.

2026-05-298

pmstack-onboarding

RyanAlberts/pmstack

An interactive 9-step tutorial that walks a new user through every pmstack capability using a realistic AI-code-review scenario. Includes Anthropic's vibe-test (read raw transcripts before formalizing an eval) and transcript-review (diagnose failed trials as model / grader / task errors) rituals. Works in claude.ai web, desktop, and mobile (no terminal needed). Trigger when the user says "I just installed pmstack," "how do I use this," "tutorial," "walk me through pmstack," "getting started," or "show me what pmstack does."

2026-05-058

pmstack-transcript-review

RyanAlberts/pmstack

Walks a PM through Anthropic's Step 6 ritual — reading transcripts from many trials to diagnose every failed eval task as one of three things — model mistake, grader mistake, or task-spec error. Implements the practice Anthropic describes as "critical" — without it, badly-calibrated graders mask real model improvements. Use when the user has a /run-eval result with failures, asks "why did this fail?", says "let's read the transcripts," wants to debug an eval, suspects grader bugs, or mentions Anthropic's transcript-review practice. Accepts a run folder path, pasted summary + cases, or attached files. Output: a markdown memo at outputs/transcript-review-<feature>-<date>.md with verdict counts and per-trial diagnoses.

2026-05-058

pmstack-vibe-test

RyanAlberts/pmstack

Walks a PM through the layer-1 ritual of reading raw transcripts of an AI feature in action — what Anthropic calls "manual testing, dogfooding, and intuition" — before formalizing a structured eval. Surfaces failure patterns, drafts task candidates (including balanced negative cases per Anthropic Step 3), and produces a verdict on whether the feature is ready for /eval. Use when the user says "I want to vibe-test this," "I have transcripts of our AI feature," "before we write evals let's read the data," "we have support tickets / bug reports about this AI feature," or asks how to start an eval from scratch. Accepts pasted transcripts, attached files, or a folder path. Output: a markdown memo at outputs/vibe-test-<feature>-<date>.md.

2026-05-058

name

pmstack-competitive

description

Competitive Landscape Analysis

Produce a comparative analysis of 3–5 real competitors and identify white space.

Required structure

For each competitor:

Target audience
Core value proposition
Key strengths
Key weaknesses / gaps
Pricing model (if known)
Recent moves in the last 12 months

Then synthesize:

White Space — concrete wedge a new entrant could exploit (not "better UX")
What I'd want to validate — the 3 biggest assumptions in the analysis

Hard rules

Only name competitors you are confident exist. If you're not sure, say so explicitly. Do not fabricate.
Cite source URLs for factual claims.
Use a markdown table for the comparison matrix — same dimensions across competitors.
Hedge appropriately for facts you couldn't fully verify.

Where to write

With filesystem: outputs/competitive-<market-slug>-<YYYY-MM-DD>.md
Inline (web/mobile): emit as markdown with the suggested filename

Tone

Objective, analytical, direct. No marketing fluff.