一键导入
chromium-local-smoke-tests
Pattern for always-on Chromium browser smoke coverage using a deterministic local Edge page plus a stable public-web slice
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
菜单
Pattern for always-on Chromium browser smoke coverage using a deterministic local Edge page plus a stable public-web slice
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
| name | chromium-local-smoke-tests |
| description | Pattern for always-on Chromium browser smoke coverage using a deterministic local Edge page plus a stable public-web slice |
| domain | testing |
| confidence | high |
| source | earned |
Use this when the team wants a small, always-on Chromium browser slice that proves real page interaction honestly without creating browser-specific MCP tools.
--force-renderer-accessibility, and an isolated --user-data-dir for reliability.https://demo.playwright.dev/todomvc/) and assert only long-lived page content such as labeled inputs or links.Edit.Button.ui_type + ui_read.ui_read on Chromium page content.ui_click affected the DOM, not just that the automation layer returned success.--app=) plus accessibility/startup hygiene and an isolated profile, then wait for all page-owned readiness selectors before running assertions. Only if readiness does not appear should the test harness use a narrow, test-only dismissal path for known Edge first-run/sync dialogs; if Stefan's sync popup appears, look specifically for a "Got it" button and dismiss that exact button before proceeding.What needs to be done? → Edit).clickResult.Success == true as sufficient proof of Chromium interaction; require a page-content effect.{what this skill teaches agents}
Guidance for semantic-first Windows automation with the bundled windows-mcp server. Use when automating desktop apps, choosing UI Automation vs screenshots, or handling DPI and multi-monitor issues.
Keep browser automation discovery compact by extending existing semantic UI automation guidance
How to test prompt guidance for usefulness without letting prompt size or claims sprawl