name	test-quality
description	Design or review behavior tests, QA coverage, TDD, or mutation strength.

Test Quality

Behavior owner = product/spec/public contract + verified implementation boundary.
Proof target = observable behavior at narrowest meaningful public seam; implementation detail ≠ behavior.
Refactor without behavior change → test remains valid.
Strength proof → intended behavior break makes test fail; coverage/pass alone ≠ effective test.

Work	Load	Completion
Test/QA design, review, regression, mutation	workflow.md	Required scenarios + sensitivity + strength proven
Explicit TDD/red-green-refactor	tdd.md	Every behavior increment completes RED → GREEN → REFACTOR

This skill owns: behavior model + seam + scenarios/edges + doubles + assertions + red evidence + mutation interpretation.
$deterministic-checks owns: exact commands + analyzers/linters/scanners + hooks + CI wiring/results.
Existing test framework/project conventions = reuse; new framework/dependency requires explicit need + approval.

behavior ID → precondition/data → user/system action → observable result → negative/edge boundary → proof layer

Every material behavior/risk + accepted state transition/boundary failure → ≥1 proof; every test → named behavior/risk.
Positive + relevant boundary/negative/permission/recovery/concurrency cases = covered or N/A + reason.
New/changed test has red/sensitivity evidence for intended reason, then passing evidence.
Mutation used where risk/cost justifies it; survivor disposition = test gap fixed / equivalent / invalid / deferred with consequence.
Flake, implementation coupling, duplicate proof, permissive assertion, or internal mock = CONCERNS until resolved.
Final audit first discovers an accepted-plan scenario family → false planning/test gate evidence, not an ordinary late test addition.

name	test-quality
description	Design or review behavior tests, QA coverage, TDD, or mutation strength.

Behavior owner = product/spec/public contract + verified implementation boundary.
Proof target = observable behavior at narrowest meaningful public seam; implementation detail ≠ behavior.
Refactor without behavior change → test remains valid.
Strength proof → intended behavior break makes test fail; coverage/pass alone ≠ effective test.

Work	Load	Completion
Test/QA design, review, regression, mutation	workflow.md	Required scenarios + sensitivity + strength proven
Explicit TDD/red-green-refactor	tdd.md	Every behavior increment completes RED → GREEN → REFACTOR

This skill owns: behavior model + seam + scenarios/edges + doubles + assertions + red evidence + mutation interpretation.
$deterministic-checks owns: exact commands + analyzers/linters/scanners + hooks + CI wiring/results.
Existing test framework/project conventions = reuse; new framework/dependency requires explicit need + approval.

behavior ID → precondition/data → user/system action → observable result → negative/edge boundary → proof layer

Every material behavior/risk + accepted state transition/boundary failure → ≥1 proof; every test → named behavior/risk.
Positive + relevant boundary/negative/permission/recovery/concurrency cases = covered or N/A + reason.
New/changed test has red/sensitivity evidence for intended reason, then passing evidence.
Mutation used where risk/cost justifies it; survivor disposition = test gap fixed / equivalent / invalid / deferred with consequence.
Flake, implementation coupling, duplicate proof, permissive assertion, or internal mock = CONCERNS until resolved.
Final audit first discovers an accepted-plan scenario family → false planning/test gate evidence, not an ordinary late test addition.

test-quality