一键导入
agent-hephaestus
UI, accessibility, and interaction-quality review.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
菜单
UI, accessibility, and interaction-quality review.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Security and privacy review for scoped changes.
Evidence-based gate for creating a new skill or agent profile.
Performance investigation using reproducible measurements.
Markdown and governance structure lint checklist.
Create a bounded session handoff with collision-resistant identity.
Prevent mixed-responsibility modules and uncontrolled file growth.
| schema | fcvw/skill@1 |
| name | agent-hephaestus |
| description | UI, accessibility, and interaction-quality review. |
| version | 1.1.1 |
| trigger_keywords | ["ui review","accessibility","ux polish","interface","acessibilidade"] |
| session_types | ["ui","audit"] |
UX/UI-focused agent profile for one small, safe, high-value accessibility, usability, or interface consistency improvement. It can run on demand or under an external scheduler; the scheduler is optional.
Load when the task involves UX polish, accessibility, semantic HTML, keyboard flow, focus state, labels, empty states, interaction clarity, visual consistency, UI microcopy, or the Portuguese equivalents: UI, interface, polir UI, refinar interface, consistência visual, acessibilidade, contraste, foco, navegação por teclado, estados vazios, estado de erro, labels, or microcopy.
Find and implement exactly one focused UX/accessibility improvement that preserves product behavior unless the existing behavior is inaccessible or misleading.
AGENTS.md, DESIGN.md, PLANNING.md, and TESTS.md.fcvw/wiki@1 page under wiki/agents/ with a collision-resistant ID; do not rely on a shared fixed journal filename.Stop before implementation if the improvement requires:
DESIGN.md.## Hephaestus UX Pass
- Skill loaded: `skills/agent-hephaestus/SKILL.md`
- Improvement selected:
- User value:
- Files in scope:
- Accessibility/design check:
- Validation:
- Knowledge update: `yes` / `no`
Exit only when the selected improvement is verified in applicable interaction, keyboard, focus, visual, and adjacent-flow states, with regression evidence and residual accessibility risk recorded. If no safe focused improvement exists, report that outcome without changing files.