to-prd
Turn the current conversation into a PRD and publish it to the project issue tracker — no interview, just synthesis of what you've already discussed.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
菜单
Turn the current conversation into a PRD and publish it to the project issue tracker — no interview, just synthesis of what you've already discussed.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
Autonomous developer iteration loop driven by a thin orchestrator that dispatches coder/reviewer/diagnoser subagents. Pick a mode — fix (make tests green), feature (implement one or more features), optimize (push a metric), debug (root-cause a failure), ab-test (race candidate implementations), or prototype (explore design variants) — define a verification signal, confirm the plan with the user, then loop implement → verify → review → commit with all state kept in loop-log.md. Use when the user states a concrete engineering goal or says "keep iterating", "loop on this", "autoloop", or "iterate until fixed".
Break a plan, spec, or PRD into independently-grabbable issues on the project issue tracker using tracer-bullet vertical slices.
Move issues and external PRs through a state machine of triage roles — categorise, verify, grill if needed, and write agent-ready briefs.
Keeps the tswift project website in sync with runtime implementation changes — coverage numbers, feature tables, WASM binary, and content. Use when features are implemented, coverage changes, the runtime is updated, or the user asks to update/sync/refresh the website.
Spawn a pi subagent to handle a specific task in a separate process. Use when the user asks to delegate work to a subagent, run a task in parallel, or says "spawn a subagent", "use a subagent", or "run this with pi".
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
| name | to-prd |
| description | Turn the current conversation into a PRD and publish it to the project issue tracker — no interview, just synthesis of what you've already discussed. |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
This skill takes the current conversation context and codebase understanding and produces a PRD. Do NOT interview the user — just synthesize what you already know.
Issue tracker config: docs/agents/issue-tracker.md; triage label vocabulary: docs/agents/triage-labels.md.
Explore the repo to understand the current state of the codebase, if you haven't already. Use the project's domain glossary vocabulary throughout the PRD, and respect any ADRs in the area you're touching.
Sketch out the seams at which you're going to test the feature. Existing seams should be preferred to new ones. Use the highest seam possible. If new seams are needed, propose them at the highest point you can. The fewer seams across the codebase, the better - the ideal number is one.
Check with the user that these seams match their expectations.
ready-for-agent triage label - no need for additional triage.The problem that the user is facing, from the user's perspective.
The solution to the problem, from the user's perspective.
A LONG, numbered list of user stories. Each user story should be in the format of:
This list of user stories should be extremely extensive and cover all aspects of the feature.
A list of implementation decisions that were made. This can include:
Do NOT include specific file paths or code snippets. They may end up being outdated very quickly.
Exception: if a prototype produced a snippet that encodes a decision more precisely than prose can (state machine, reducer, schema, type shape), inline it within the relevant decision and note briefly that it came from a prototype. Trim to the decision-rich parts — not a working demo, just the important bits.
A list of testing decisions that were made. Include:
A description of the things that are out of scope for this PRD.
Any further notes about the feature.