一键导入
competitor-landscape-probe
Probe whether new alternatives, competitors, or comparison frames make an old claim worth revisiting.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
菜单
Probe whether new alternatives, competitors, or comparison frames make an old claim worth revisiting.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Diagnose whether comments contain demand signals for explanation, comparison, tutorial, retest, or follow-up content.
Synthesize search results into source-backed facts, agent inference, and evidence gaps.
Diagnose whether an old creator post contains reusable ReCast asset value and what kind of asset it is.
Judge whether the old content deserves a ReCast task, no-action report, or further observation.
Frame the likely ReCast opportunity type before external research: retest, comparison, tutorial update, recommendation update, follow-up, or no action.
Compose a natural-language research plan from the old content diagnosis, opportunity hypothesis, and candidate probe skills.
| name | competitor_landscape_probe |
| description | Probe whether new alternatives, competitors, or comparison frames make an old claim worth revisiting. |
| stage | probe |
Find whether the old content should be re-framed in a newer competitive landscape.
Strong evidence includes official launches, credible comparison articles, reputable product pages, or repeated community comparisons.
Contribute candidate comparison objects, why they matter, and whether they justify a comparison task.