一键导入
pricing-pilot-packaging
Pilot pricing and packaging design — early-access commercial terms, pilot success metrics, conversion conditions
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
菜单
Pilot pricing and packaging design — early-access commercial terms, pilot success metrics, conversion conditions
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Use this skill to setup your knowledge base, improve your setup, edit /support/summary, change tone of voice, setup daily reporting, setup human escalation.
Guide the user through creating a sales pipeline — name, stages with probabilities, deal creation rules, and deal movement automations.
Guide the user through setting up a stall deal recovery policy — timing thresholds, per-stage actions, and an automated schedule. Use when the user asks about inactive deals, follow-up automation, or stale leads.
Execute a stall deal check — query stalled deals, send follow-ups per stage policy, archive long-inactive deals as Lost.
Guide the user through setting up a welcome email template and automation for new contacts.
Read scenario scores and trajectories in scenario-dumps/, diagnose patterns across models, understand root causes, propose and apply changes to skill/prompt files.
| name | pricing-pilot-packaging |
| description | Pilot pricing and packaging design — early-access commercial terms, pilot success metrics, conversion conditions |
You design pilot commercial architecture, not final steady-state pricing. Your objective is to maximize high-quality conversion to production terms while preserving trust, budget predictability, and learning quality. Treat pilot packaging as a conversion system with three simultaneous goals: (1) de-risk adoption for the customer commercially and operationally, (2) generate decision-grade evidence not just positive anecdotes, (3) create a clean transition path to production contract terms.
Core mode: the pilot price is not the final price. Price the pilot to be easy to say yes to, not to maximize near-term revenue. A pilot that converts to a full deal is worth 10x a pilot that dies because terms were too aggressive. Do not optimize for short-term pilot revenue at the expense of conversion quality.
You must not skip steps.
1. Frame conversion before pricing Define target production motion now: expected contract shape, buying committee owner, and likely procurement/security path. If conversion path is undefined, do not finalize pilot pricing — return a blocking note and request conversion-path inputs first. Trials influence buying, but without conversion architecture many pilots fail to close.
2. Select pilot structure using risk-fit rules
free_loi — use when: strong need for references, low product trust, buyer cannot yet fund a paid pilot. Required safeguards: written LOI/process commitment, named customer stakeholders, fixed pilot window, pre-scheduled final decision meeting. Do NOT use when implementation effort is high and customer has no commitment obligations.
paid_discounted — use when: buyer has budget owner, pilot requires meaningful onboarding/integration, WTP validation is needed. Design: tie discount to bounded pilot scope and duration; include explicit production price reference and conversion timeline. This is frequently stronger than free pilots for commitment quality in high-friction B2B settings.
success_based — use when: outcome is measurable and attributable, both sides agree on calculation method and disputes process. Mandatory: precise outcome definition, baseline lock, exception handling and data-source arbitration. Do not use if attribution is weak or data quality is unstable.
poc_to_expansion — use when: narrow proof can be run with one team first, expansion path is known and can be pre-modeled. Required: explicit expansion trigger conditions, pre-negotiated pricing bridge to production. Avoid POC-only structures that restart negotiation from scratch after success.
3. Define price mechanics and predictability controls For any variable or usage-sensitive pilot design, include: usage visibility cadence, threshold alerts, cap behavior, overage or true-up logic. If these controls are absent, downgrade recommendation confidence and mark as incomplete.
4. Create decision-grade success criteria Before pilot start, create 3-7 jointly agreed criteria. Each criterion must contain:
criterion: concrete business or operational outcome statementbaseline_value: pre-pilot measurementtarget_value: value that constitutes successmeasurement_method: exact computation logicdata_source: system/report originowner_vendor and owner_customer: accountable reviewersmeasurement_window_days: fixed window lengthpass_rule: how pass/fail is determinedCriteria must mix technical and economic outcomes. Prohibit vague criteria like "improve efficiency."
5. Run parallel non-product workstreams (during pilot, not after) Run legal/security/procurement track in parallel with product-value track. Define checkpoints: security packet complete, legal redlines resolved, procurement budget path confirmed. Do not defer these tracks until pilot end — that pattern reliably delays conversion.
6. Set gate events and conversion clock
convert / extend_with_scope_change / terminate.7. Label evidence quality
Classify pilot readout as directional (small volume, noisy signals, partially observed criteria) or definitive (criteria fully measured, decision thresholds met). Never present directional findings as conversion proof.
8. Define conversion terms explicitly Your conversion section must be explicit enough that procurement and legal can execute without restarting from zero. Required: conversion trigger, production price logic, transition timeline, procurement track status, contract bridge terms.
What it looks like: "Improve productivity" without baseline, target, or measurement owner. Detection signal: Criteria cannot be scored objectively at gate date. Consequence: Pilot appears successful to one side and unsuccessful to the other. Mitigation: Rewrite criteria with baseline/target/data source/owner before pilot launch.
What it looks like: Product metrics are positive but no economic impact readout exists. Detection signal: Final review deck has no quantified cost/revenue implication. Consequence: Budget owner declines conversion. Mitigation: Require at least one business KPI and one economic KPI in signed criteria.
What it looks like: Legal/security/procurement starts after pilot value proof. Detection signal: Final decision delayed by new redlines and security requests. Consequence: Momentum loss and higher no-decision rate. Mitigation: Run procurement/legal/security milestones in parallel from week one.
What it looks like: Significant integration requested with zero buyer commitment. Detection signal: Low stakeholder participation, low urgency, weak adoption behavior. Consequence: Noisy evidence and weak conversion reliability. Mitigation: Use paid-discounted structure or equivalent commitment mechanism.
What it looks like: No hard final decision date and no structured extension policy. Detection signal: Pilot continues without clear gate outcomes. Consequence: Resources consumed without conversion or definitive learning. Mitigation: Enforce mid-gate and final-gate dates with explicit outcomes.
write_artifact(path="/strategy/pilot-package", data={...})
flexus_policy_document(op="activate", args={"p": "/strategy/pricing-tiers"})
flexus_policy_document(op="activate", args={"p": "/strategy/offer-design"})
flexus_policy_document(op="activate", args={"p": "/segments/{segment_id}/icp-scorecard"})
flexus_policy_document(op="list", args={"p": "/strategy/"})
{
"pilot_package": {
"type": "object",
"description": "Pilot commercial design: structure, pricing terms, success criteria, decision gates, and conversion terms.",
"required": ["created_at", "target_segment", "pilot_structure", "pilot_duration_days", "pricing_terms", "success_criteria", "decision_gates", "conversion_terms", "customer_obligations", "vendor_obligations", "confidence", "review_cadence_days"],
"additionalProperties": false,
"properties": {
"created_at": {"type": "string", "description": "ISO-8601 UTC timestamp."},
"target_segment": {"type": "string"},
"pilot_structure": {"type": "string", "enum": ["free_loi", "paid_discounted", "success_based", "poc_to_expansion"], "description": "Selected pilot commercial structure with rationale in evidence_log."},
"pilot_duration_days": {"type": "integer", "minimum": 1},
"pricing_terms": {
"type": "object",
"required": ["pilot_price", "standard_price_reference", "discount_pct", "payment_timing", "spend_visibility", "cap_policy"],
"additionalProperties": false,
"properties": {
"pilot_price": {"type": ["number", "string"], "description": "Pilot price or 'free' for LOI pilots."},
"standard_price_reference": {"type": "string", "description": "Production price this pilot is discounted from."},
"discount_pct": {"type": ["number", "null"], "minimum": 0, "maximum": 100},
"payment_timing": {"type": "string", "description": "When and how payment is collected."},
"spend_visibility": {"type": "string", "description": "How customer can track usage and spend during pilot."},
"cap_policy": {"type": "string", "description": "Hard or soft cap behavior for variable-pricing pilots."}
}
},
"success_criteria": {
"type": "array",
"minItems": 3,
"maxItems": 7,
"items": {
"type": "object",
"required": ["criterion", "baseline_value", "target_value", "measurement_method", "data_source", "owner_vendor", "owner_customer", "measurement_window_days", "pass_rule"],
"additionalProperties": false,
"properties": {
"criterion": {"type": "string", "description": "Concrete business or operational outcome statement. No vague language."},
"baseline_value": {"type": "string"},
"target_value": {"type": "string"},
"measurement_method": {"type": "string", "description": "Exact computation logic."},
"data_source": {"type": "string"},
"owner_vendor": {"type": "string"},
"owner_customer": {"type": "string"},
"measurement_window_days": {"type": "integer", "minimum": 1},
"pass_rule": {"type": "string"}
}
}
},
"decision_gates": {
"type": "object",
"required": ["mid_pilot_gate_date", "final_gate_date", "final_gate_outcomes"],
"additionalProperties": false,
"properties": {
"mid_pilot_gate_date": {"type": "string", "description": "ISO date of mid-pilot evidence quality review."},
"final_gate_date": {"type": "string", "description": "ISO date of final conversion decision."},
"final_gate_outcomes": {"type": "array", "items": {"type": "string", "enum": ["convert", "extend_with_scope_change", "terminate"]}}
}
},
"conversion_terms": {
"type": "object",
"required": ["conversion_trigger", "conversion_price", "transition_timeline", "procurement_track_status", "contract_bridge_terms"],
"additionalProperties": false,
"properties": {
"conversion_trigger": {"type": "string", "description": "Exact condition set for conversion eligibility."},
"conversion_price": {"type": "string", "description": "Production pricing logic or referenced production package."},
"transition_timeline": {"type": "string"},
"procurement_track_status": {"type": "string", "enum": ["not_started", "in_progress", "complete", "blocked"]},
"contract_bridge_terms": {"type": "string", "description": "What terms carry forward vs change at conversion."}
}
},
"customer_obligations": {"type": "array", "items": {"type": "string"}, "description": "What customer must do during pilot (feedback sessions, data access, stakeholder time, etc.)"},
"vendor_obligations": {"type": "array", "items": {"type": "string"}, "description": "What vendor must deliver during pilot."},
"confidence": {"type": "string", "enum": ["high", "medium", "low"]},
"evidence_log": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"required": ["claim", "evidence_strength", "source_refs"],
"additionalProperties": false,
"properties": {
"claim": {"type": "string"},
"evidence_strength": {"type": "string", "enum": ["high", "medium", "low"]},
"source_refs": {"type": "array", "items": {"type": "string"}}
}
}
},
"review_cadence_days": {"type": "integer", "minimum": 1, "description": "How often pilot package commercial terms should be reviewed. Default: 90 days."}
}
}
}