一键导入
gsd-code-review
Review source files changed during a phase for bugs, security issues, and code quality problems
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
菜单
Review source files changed during a phase for bugs, security issues, and code quality problems
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Audit milestone completion against original intent before archiving
Add an idea to the backlog parking lot (999.x numbering)
Add phase to end of current milestone in roadmap
Generate tests for a completed phase based on UAT criteria and implementation
Capture idea or task as todo from current conversation context
Generate AI design contract (AI-SPEC.md) for phases that involve building AI systems — framework selection, implementation guidance from official docs, and evaluation strategy
| name | gsd-code-review |
| description | Review source files changed during a phase for bugs, security issues, and code quality problems |
| metadata | {"short-description":"Review source files changed during a phase for bugs, security issues, and code quality problems"} |
<codex_skill_adapter>
$gsd-code-review.$gsd-code-review as {{GSD_ARGS}}.{{GSD_ARGS}} as empty.GSD workflows use AskUserQuestion (Claude Code syntax). Translate to Codex request_user_input:
Parameter mapping:
header → headerquestion → question"Label" — description → {label: "Label", description: "description"}id from header: lowercase, replace spaces with underscoresBatched calls:
AskUserQuestion([q1, q2]) → single request_user_input with multiple entries in questions[]Multi-select workaround:
multiSelect. Use sequential single-selects, or present a numbered freeform list asking the user to enter comma-separated numbers.Execute mode fallback:
request_user_input is rejected (Execute mode), present a plain-text numbered list and pick a reasonable default.GSD workflows use Task(...) (Claude Code syntax). Translate to Codex collaboration tools:
Direct mapping:
Task(subagent_type="X", prompt="Y") → spawn_agent(agent_type="X", message="Y")Task(model="...") → omit (Codex uses per-role config, not inline model selection)fork_context: false by default — GSD agents load their own context via <files_to_read> blocksParallel fan-out:
wait(ids) for all to completeResult parsing:
CHECKPOINT, PLAN COMPLETE, SUMMARY, etc.close_agent(id) after collecting results from each agent
</codex_skill_adapter>Spawns the gsd-code-reviewer agent to analyze code at the specified depth level. Produces REVIEW.md artifact in the phase directory with severity-classified findings.
Arguments:
--depth=quick|standard|deep (optional) — review depth level, overrides workflow.code_review_depth config
--files file1,file2,... (optional) — explicit comma-separated file list, skips SUMMARY/git scoping (highest precedence for scoping)Output: {padded_phase}-REVIEW.md in phase directory + inline summary of findings
<execution_context> @/Users/gabrielwillen/VSCode/stateforward/emel/emel.cpp/.codex/get-shit-done/workflows/code-review.md </execution_context>
Phase: {{GSD_ARGS}} (first positional argument is phase number)Optional flags parsed from {{GSD_ARGS}}:
--depth=VALUE — Depth override (quick|standard|deep). If provided, overrides workflow.code_review_depth config.--files=file1,file2,... — Explicit file list override. Has highest precedence for file scoping per D-08. When provided, workflow skips SUMMARY.md extraction and git diff fallback entirely.Context files (AGENTS.md, SUMMARY.md, phase state) are resolved inside the workflow via gsd-tools init phase-op and delegated to agent via <files_to_read> blocks.
Execute the code-review workflow from @/Users/gabrielwillen/VSCode/stateforward/emel/emel.cpp/.codex/get-shit-done/workflows/code-review.md end-to-end.
The workflow (not this command) enforces these gates: