菜单
Use when an in-flight feature must change — scope shifts, an AC is refined, the plan evolves, a behavior is added or removed. Triggers — "/engineer.feature-edit", "change feature X to", "the ACs need updating", "revise the plan", "scope changed".
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Use when exploring a feature idea before committing, or revisiting a parked one. Triggers — "/engineer.discuss", "/engineer.discuss <slug>", "I have an idea about", "should we build", "let's think about".
Use when a new feature folder must be created for the DAE pipeline, or when discuss promotes/parks an idea. Triggers — "/engineer.feature-init", "create a feature", "start a new feature", "init a feature".
Use at the start of a work session, or any time the question is "what should I pick up now" across the whole project. Triggers — "/engineer.next", "what's next", "what should I work on", "what should I do next", "where do I pick up".
Use to bring a project into the DAE methodology, or to check an onboarded project for gaps. Triggers — "/engineer.onboard", "onboard this project", "set up DAE here", "adopt the methodology", or when a DAE skill fails because no manifest exists.
Use to propagate DAE state — turning handoff summaries into visible progress. Triggers — "/engineer.progress-log", "sync progress", "update the tracker", "reconcile the tracker", "refresh feature status".
Use to drive a bug fix from first report through close, with a "why didn't we catch it?" loop at the end. Triggers — "/engineer.fix", "a bug came in", "this is broken", "a user reported X", "there's a defect", "we have a regression", "this needs a fix", "another report", "more issues", "still failing", "validation failed again", "another bug", "next defect", "more fixes".
| name | feature-edit |
| description | Use when an in-flight feature must change — scope shifts, an AC is refined, the plan evolves, a behavior is added or removed. Triggers — "/engineer.feature-edit", "change feature X to", "the ACs need updating", "revise the plan", "scope changed". |
Intent-driven editing of an in-flight feature. The human describes what should now be true; this skill figures out which files and tools to touch and orchestrates the change, including the downstream cascade.
The cascade-owning skill — clarify and refine deliberately stay single-artifact and route multi-artifact propagation here. Mixed mode: the agent proposes an edit plan, the human confirms before any write.
Any time an existing feature's artifacts must change. checkpoint: null.
Not for: a brand-new capability (discuss); within-one-artifact ambiguity, no behavior change (clarify); validating consistency (consistency-check); cleaning up code (refine).
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/dae_resolve.py (see references/resolving.md); locate the feature (slug, branch, or search feature.md titles/outcomes).discuss. Stop.feature.md; a behavior → acs.md; a GWT detail → spec.md; architecture/phasing → plan.md.feature.md → acs.md → spec.md → plan.md); upstream problems are surfaced, never auto-propagated. Per downstream artifact, classify by blast radius: small/mechanical → feature-edit edits directly; substantial → invoke the owning skill (discover-acs / atdd:atdd / plan) in edit-pass mode..build/spec.json after any spec.md change; re-run affected test streams if code exists. If regeneration reveals an upstream problem, stop and surface it.progress.md (affected checkpoint rows) and the tracker via the driver.Emit per ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/handoff-summary.md. checkpoint: null; artifacts lists every artifact edited. recommended_next: typically "re-run /engineer.consistency-check".