| name | design-audit-orchestration |
| description | Use this skill when aggregating design audit findings across multiple dimensions, deduplicating related issues, or synthesizing results into executive summaries with remediation roadmaps |
| user-invocable | false |
Design Audit Orchestration
Guidance for orchestrating comprehensive design audits across multiple dimensions and synthesizing findings into actionable reports.
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- Aggregating findings from multiple analysis dimensions (heuristics, accessibility, visual, components)
- Deduplicating and cross-referencing related findings
- Prioritizing findings by severity and impact
- Creating executive summaries and remediation roadmaps
- Synthesizing insights that span multiple dimensions
Multi-Dimensional Analysis Framework
Design audits analyze 4 independent dimensions:
1. Usability Heuristics (Nielsen's 10)
- Visibility of system status
- Match between system and real world
- User control and freedom
- Error prevention and recovery
- Recognition vs recall
- Flexibility and efficiency
- Aesthetic and minimalist design
- Help and documentation
- Error messages
- Emergency exits
2. Accessibility Compliance (WCAG)
- Color contrast and visual perception
- Keyboard navigation and focus management
- Semantic HTML and heading hierarchy
- ARIA patterns and landmarks
- Form accessibility and error handling
- Motion and animation preferences
- Text alternatives and captions
3. Visual Consistency (Design Tokens)
- Color palette usage and deviations
- Typography consistency (fonts, sizes, weights)
- Spacing patterns (margins, padding, gaps)
- Shape and border radius consistency
- Shadow and elevation patterns
- Motion and transition properties
4. Component Reusability (Design System)
- Component duplication and near-duplicates
- Composition patterns and nesting depth
- API/prop consistency across similar components
- Naming conventions and clarity
- Documentation completeness
Finding Aggregation Patterns
Deduplication Strategy
Same issue found by multiple dimensions:
- Heuristic + Accessibility: "Error message not visible" (heuristic: error prevention) + "error message lacks color contrast" (accessibility: WCAG 1.4.3)
- Visual + Component: "Button color inconsistent" (visual: color token) + "button component has multiple implementations" (component: duplication)
Action: Merge into single finding with cross-dimensional impact
Cross-Referencing Strategy
Finding in one dimension affects another:
- Accessibility finding: "Form labels not associated" → impacts Heuristic: "Recognition vs recall" (users can't remember what field is what)
- Component finding: "Button component duplicated" → impacts Visual: "Inconsistent button colors" (each implementation uses different color)
Action: Link findings and explain cascading impact
Severity Calculation
Combine severity from multiple dimensions:
- Critical: Blocks user task completion (accessibility + heuristic)
- High: Significantly impacts user experience (visual + component)
- Medium: Noticeable but workaround exists (single dimension)
- Low: Polish/refinement (minor inconsistency)
Synthesis Patterns
Executive Summary Structure
-
Overall Health Score (0-100)
- Weighted average across dimensions
- Heuristics: 30% (user experience)
- Accessibility: 40% (compliance + inclusion)
- Visual: 15% (consistency)
- Components: 15% (maintainability)
-
Critical Issues (top 3-5)
- Issues blocking user tasks
- Compliance violations
- High-impact duplications
-
Dimension Breakdown
- Summary for each dimension
- Key findings per dimension
- Dimension-specific recommendations
-
Remediation Roadmap
- Phase 1: Critical (accessibility, blocking issues)
- Phase 2: High (visual consistency, component consolidation)
- Phase 3: Medium (heuristics refinement)
- Phase 4: Low (polish)
Remediation Roadmap Template
Phase 1: Critical (Week 1-2)
- [Finding 1]: [Remediation] - Effort: [hours]
- [Finding 2]: [Remediation] - Effort: [hours]
Phase 2: High (Week 3-4)
- [Finding 3]: [Remediation] - Effort: [hours]
Phase 3: Medium (Week 5-6)
- [Finding 4]: [Remediation] - Effort: [hours]
Phase 4: Low (Ongoing)
- [Finding 5]: [Remediation] - Effort: [hours]
Output Structure
{
"audit_summary": {
"overall_health_score": 72,
"total_findings": 24,
"critical_count": 3,
"high_count": 8,
"medium_count": 10,
"low_count": 3
},
"dimension_summaries": {
"heuristics": {
"score": 68,
"key_findings": [...],
"recommendations": [...]
},
"accessibility": {
"score": 65,
"key_findings": [...],
"recommendations": [...]
},
"visual_consistency": {
"score": 82,
"key_findings": [...],
"recommendations": [...]
},
"components": {
"score": 75,
"key_findings": [...],
"recommendations": [...]
}
},
"cross_dimensional_insights": [
{
"title": "Error handling affects both heuristics and accessibility",
"findings": ["heuristic-5", "accessibility-3"],
"impact": "Users cannot recover from errors effectively"
}
],
"remediation_roadmap": [
{
"phase": 1,
"priority": "critical",
"items": [...]
}
]
}