菜单
Use when the supplied data looks synthetic, degraded, incomplete or wrong, and whenever you are tempted to reframe the study around what you found about the inputs, the harness or the evaluation. Covers what to do with a real data problem without losing the study.
默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt；你也可以切换为直接命令，或下载本地副本。
决定是否安装前，请先阅读 SKILL.md，以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt；运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/tangxiangru/AutoR --skill run-the-requested-analysis命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地？可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
Use when writing results and discussion, and when a task or a reviewer asks why an effect happens rather than whether it does. Covers the difference between reporting an effect and accounting for it, and what a mechanism claim needs behind it.
Use when planning figures, at study design and again before writing. Covers the figures a paper in this field is expected to contain, why an original figure does not substitute for a standard one, and how to decide what to draw first.
Use when deciding how to aggregate results, at analysis and figure planning. Covers why a pooled number hides the result, which strata a study is expected to report, and when an aggregate is the right answer.
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | run-the-requested-analysis |
| description | Use when the supplied data looks synthetic, degraded, incomplete or wrong, and whenever you are tempted to reframe the study around what you found about the inputs, the harness or the evaluation. Covers what to do with a real data problem without losing the study. |
You will often be right that the supplied data is a thin surrogate, that a file is mislabelled, that the corpus cannot support the claim it was cut from. Noticing that is good research. What follows it decides whether the run is worth anything.
The failure mode is consistent: the run investigates the inputs, finds something real, and reorganises the whole study around that finding. The requested analysis is then never run at all — not because it was impossible, but because the run stopped being about it. From the inside this feels like following the evidence. From the outside every requested result is missing.
The caveated result plus the audit is strictly more than the audit. It is also more useful: a reader can see both what the specified protocol yields and why they should discount it.
Do not turn the study into an analysis of the harness, the evaluation, the scoring, or the scaffold you are running inside. That is a different paper, it answers none of the task's questions, and no amount of insight in it counts toward the study you were asked to do.
Look at your section list against the task statement. If a requested analysis has no section, you have replaced the study rather than extended it.