academic-writing-suite

name

academic-writing-suite

description

All-in-one academic writing toolkit for research papers and term papers. Use this skill for any of the following: formatting, converting, or exporting references (APA, MLA, Chicago, IEEE, GB/T 7714, Vancouver, BibTeX, RIS, EndNote, Zotero); writing or improving abstracts and keywords; writing a conclusion, discussion, or closing section; polishing an Introduction (CARS structure, research gap); polishing a Method section (replication clarity, passive voice); polishing a Results section (reporting precision, separating interpretation); polishing a Discussion section (interpretation, literature comparison, limitations, implications). Trigger whenever the user asks for help with any section of a research paper or with references.

Academic Writing Suite

A unified toolkit covering seven academic writing functions. This skill reads the user's request, identifies which function is needed, then loads the corresponding sub-skill.

---

Routing Table

Read the user's request and match it to one of the seven functions below. Then load the corresponding sub-skill file and follow its instructions completely.

User need	Sub-skill to load
Format, convert, detect, or export references (APA / MLA / Chicago / IEEE / GB/T 7714 / Vancouver / BibTeX / RIS / EndNote / Zotero / NoteExpress)	reference-formatter/SKILL.md
Write, rewrite, or improve an abstract or keyword list	abstract-writer/SKILL.md
Write or improve a Conclusion / Discussion / Closing section	closing-writer/SKILL.md
Polish or restructure an Introduction section	introduction-polisher/SKILL.md
Polish or restructure a Method / Methods / Methodology section	method-polisher/SKILL.md
Polish or restructure a Results / Findings section	results-polisher/SKILL.md
Polish or restructure a Discussion section	discussion-polisher/SKILL.md

---

Handling Ambiguous Requests

"Help me with my paper" — ask which section or function the user needs, then route.

"Polish my discussion/conclusion" — Note: the closing section of a paper may be labeled Discussion, Conclusion, or both. Route as follows:

• If the user wants to interpret findings, compare with literature, evaluate limitations → discussion-polisher/SKILL.md
• If the user wants to wrap up the paper, state implications, make future recommendations → closing-writer/SKILL.md
• If the section combines both functions → load both, apply discussion-polisher logic first, then closing-writer for the deductions

Multiple sections at once — if the user uploads a full paper and asks for general improvements, handle one section at a time: Introduction → Method → Results → Discussion/Closing → Abstract. Ask the user which to start with, or proceed in IMRAD order if they say "all of them".

---

File Input

Use the first applicable method to read any uploaded file:

1. Content already in context → process directly
2. File reading tool available → use it
3. Code execution available → .docx: python-docx / .pdf: pdfplumber / .txt: open()
4. Nothing available → ask the user to paste the relevant content

---

Output Language

Default: English. Follow user instructions if another language is specified.