aif-implement

name	aif-implement
description	Execute implementation tasks from the current plan. Works through tasks sequentially, marks completion, and preserves progress for continuation across sessions. Use when user says "implement", "start coding", "execute plan", or "continue implementation".
argument-hint	[--list] [--without-plan <description>] [@plan-file] [task-id or "status"]
allowed-tools	Read Write Edit Glob Grep Bash TaskList TaskGet TaskUpdate AskUserQuestion Questions mcp__handoff__handoff_sync_status mcp__handoff__handoff_push_plan mcp__handoff__handoff_get_task mcp__handoff__handoff_list_tasks mcp__handoff__handoff_update_task
disable-model-invocation	false

Implement - Execute Task Plan

Execute tasks from the plan, track progress, and enable session continuation.

Workflow

Step 0 (pre): Detect Handoff Mode

Determine Handoff mode. If the caller passed HANDOFF_MODE and HANDOFF_SKIP_REVIEW as explicit text in the prompt, use those values. Otherwise, use the Bash tool:

Bash: printenv HANDOFF_MODE || true
Bash: printenv HANDOFF_SKIP_REVIEW || true

Then check HANDOFF_MODE:

When HANDOFF_MODE is 1 (autonomous Handoff agent)

The Handoff coordinator already manages status transitions and DB writes directly. Do NOT call MCP tools. Instead:

• No interactive questions: Do not use AskUserQuestion — use sensible defaults (auto-commit at checkpoints, skip pause prompts).
• No pause/resume prompts: Execute all tasks sequentially without stopping.

When HANDOFF_MODE is NOT 1 (manual Claude Code session)

Handoff sync is handled inline — see Step 0.2 (after reading the plan file) for the task ID extraction and MCP sync trigger. The sync points are:

• On start (Step 0.2): handoff_sync_status → "implementing" (with paused: true)
• On checklist update (Step 3.6): handoff_push_plan with updated plan content
• On completion (Step 5): handoff_push_plan with final plan, then handoff_sync_status → "review" (with paused: true) or "done" (with paused: false when HANDOFF_SKIP_REVIEW=1)

CRITICAL: Always pass paused: true with every handoff_sync_status call except done. This prevents the autonomous Handoff agent from picking up the task while you work manually. Only done passes paused: false.

Step 0: Check Current State

FIRST: Determine what state we're in:

1. Read `.ai-factory/config.yaml` if it exists to resolve:
   - `paths.description`, `paths.architecture`, `paths.rules_file`, `paths.roadmap`, `paths.research`
   - `paths.plan`, `paths.plans`, `paths.fix_plan`, `paths.patches`
   - `paths.archive`
   - `paths.rules`
   - `language.ui`, `language.artifacts`
   - `git.enabled`, `git.base_branch`, `git.create_branches`
   - `workflow.plan_id_format` (default: `slug`) — used by branch-based plan discovery.
     Active values: `slug` and `sequential`. When `sequential`, the resolver
     globs `<paths.plans>/[0-9]{4}_<branch-slug>.md` first and falls back to
     `<paths.plans>/<branch-slug>.md` only if no numbered match is found.
     `timestamp` and `uuid` are **reserved values** and currently behave like `slug`.
     Treat any unknown value as `slug`.
   - `rules.base` plus any named `rules.<area>` entries
2. Parse arguments:
   - --list → list available plans only (no implementation; STOP)
   - --without-plan <description> → inline implementation mode; skip plan discovery and jump to Step 0.inline
   - @<path> → explicit plan file override (highest priority)
   - <number> → start from specific task
   - status → status-only mode
   - Optional inline-mode flag: --docs=yes|no|warn (only valid with --without-plan; default: warn)
3. If `git.enabled = true`, check for uncommitted changes (`git status`)
4. If `git.enabled = true`, check current branch

Step 0.list: List Available Plans (--list)

If $ARGUMENTS contains --list, run read-only plan discovery and stop.

1. Get current branch:
   git branch --show-current (git mode only)
2. Convert branch to filename: replace "/" with "-", add ".md" (git mode only)
3. Check existence of:
   - <configured plans dir>/<branch-name>.md (git mode only, default `plan_id_format`)
   - when `workflow.plan_id_format = sequential`: also glob
     `<configured plans dir>/[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]_<branch-name-without-.md>.md`;
     report all matches (highest-numbered first)
   - if git mode is off or branch creation is disabled: any `*.md` full-mode plan in `<configured plans dir>/`
   - <resolved fast plan path>
   - <resolved fix plan path>
4. Print plan availability summary and usage hints
5. STOP.

Important: In --list mode:

• Do not execute tasks
• Do not modify files
• Do not update TaskList statuses

For detailed output format and examples, see:

• skills/aif-implement/references/IMPLEMENTATION-GUIDE.md → "List Available Plans (--list)"

Step 0.inline: Inline Implementation Mode (--without-plan)

If $ARGUMENTS contains --without-plan, execute a single scoped task from the description WITHOUT creating or reading any plan file. This is the lightweight path for small feat/chore tasks that do not justify a full plan but are not bug fixes either (use $aif-fix for bugs).

Argument parsing:

1. description = everything after `--without-plan`, excluding any recognized flag tokens (`--docs=...`).
2. docs_policy = value of `--docs=yes|no|warn` if present, else `warn` (default).
3. Validation:
   - description is empty →
     ERROR: "Usage: $aif-implement --without-plan <description> [--docs=yes|no|warn]"
     → STOP
   - arguments also contain `@<path>`, `status`, or a bare task id number →
     ERROR: "`--without-plan` is mutually exclusive with @plan-file, status, and task id."
     → STOP
   - `--docs=<value>` where <value> not in {yes, no, warn} →
     ERROR: "Invalid --docs value. Expected yes|no|warn."
     → STOP

Scope guard (prevent silent mega-tasks):

Before executing, assess the description. If it looks too broad for a one-shot inline task — multiple unrelated imperatives joined by "and"/"и", references to multiple subsystems, or roughly more than ~300 characters of scope — do NOT attempt to guess a plan. Instead print:

Description looks too broad for inline implementation. Recommended:
  $aif-plan fast <description>

→ STOP.

Small, focused descriptions (e.g. "add GET /healthz returning 200 with {status:"ok"}") proceed.

Surprise-warn on existing plan artifacts (non-blocking):

Inline mode ignores plan files by design. If any of these exist on disk, emit a WARN [inline] line so the user notices the intentional skip (do NOT read them, do NOT redirect):

• <configured plans dir>/<branch>.md (git mode only) — or <configured plans dir>/[0-9]{4}_<branch>.md when workflow.plan_id_format = sequential
• resolved fast plan path (paths.plan)
• resolved fix plan path (paths.fix_plan)

Example: WARN [inline] paths.plan exists but is ignored in --without-plan mode.

Load project context (same as regular implement):

Use the resolved config from Step 0:

• paths.description (DESCRIPTION.md) if present
• paths.architecture (ARCHITECTURE.md) if present
• paths.rules_file (RULES.md) + rules.base + named rules.<area> entries
• .ai-factory/skill-context/aif-implement/SKILL.md — MANDATORY if the file exists (same precedence and enforcement as regular mode in Step 0.1)
• language.ui, language.artifacts

Plan artifact policy: inline mode does NOT load or use plan/fix-plan files. Plan files are never read, parsed, or executed. A minimal existence probe is permitted (see the surprise-warn section above) solely to emit the WARN [inline] line — nothing is read from disk. Also skip: resume/recovery reconciliation, TaskList loading, checkbox state comparison.

Execute the task (one-shot):

1. Announce: Inline implementation: <description>
2. Read only files relevant to the described scope
3. Apply changes following existing code patterns and skill-context rules
4. Apply verbose logging per references/LOGGING-GUIDE.md
5. Do not add tests by default. Add them only if the description explicitly requests tests (e.g. "with tests", "add tests for X") OR if existing project conventions / touched code paths clearly require them (e.g. a test file mirrors every source file in the area being changed, or a RULES.md / skill-context rule mandates test coverage for this kind of change). When in doubt, prefer NO tests and let the user follow up via $aif-plan if wider test coverage is needed.
6. Verify the change compiles/runs and the described behavior works

Prohibited in inline mode:

• Do NOT create or read paths.plan / paths.plans/* / paths.fix_plan.
• Do NOT invoke $aif-plan or $aif-fix.
• Do NOT create entries under paths.patches (no [FIX] self-improvement patch — this is not a bugfix flow).
• Do NOT call TaskList / TaskGet / TaskUpdate (no plan = no persisted tasks).
• Do NOT search for or modify plan checkboxes on disk.
• Do NOT trigger the roadmap milestone completion check, docs checkpoint-from-plan-setting, plan-file cleanup prompt, or worktree merge prompt (those belong to the plan-backed workflow).

Handoff inline support:

Naming clarification: --without-plan means "without a local plan artifact on disk" (no paths.plan / paths.plans/* / paths.fix_plan). When a Handoff task is linked, the task is still represented as a synthetic plan inside Handoff via handoff_push_plan — that's a remote representation, not a local file. The local-no-plan contract is preserved; only the remote sync surface is unchanged.

When HANDOFF_MODE is 1 (autonomous Handoff agent invoked inline mode):

• Do NOT call any mcp__handoff__* tool (the coordinator manages status/sync directly — same rule as Step 0 (pre)).
• Do NOT create local plan artifacts (the regular Prohibited list above still applies).
• Do NOT switch branches, create worktrees, merge worktrees, or otherwise alter the branch/worktree the coordinator set up — inline mode operates on the working tree it was invoked in.
• Proceed with the one-shot execution; the coordinator marks the task complete after the skill returns.

When HANDOFF_MODE is NOT 1 and HANDOFF_TASK_ID is set (manual Claude Code session linked to a Handoff task):

1. Build synthetic plan content:

   # Inline implementation
   - [ ] <description>
   

2. Call handoff_sync_status with { taskId: <HANDOFF_TASK_ID>, newStatus: "implementing", sourceTimestamp: "<current UTC ISO 8601>", direction: "aif_to_handoff", paused: true }.

3. Call handoff_push_plan with { taskId: <HANDOFF_TASK_ID>, planContent: <synthetic content above> }.

4. After successful execution, flip the checkbox to - [x] in the synthetic content and call handoff_push_plan again with the updated text.

5. Finalize sync:

   • If HANDOFF_SKIP_REVIEW is 1 → handoff_sync_status → "done" with paused: false.
   • Otherwise → handoff_sync_status → "review" with paused: true.

If HANDOFF_TASK_ID is missing → skip all MCP sync for this run.

Docs policy (inline mode, driven by --docs):

• --docs=yes → after completion, show the docs checkpoint (same AskUserQuestion as Docs: yes in regular mode) and route changes through $aif-docs.
• --docs=no → suppress the documentation checkpoint, emit WARN [docs] --docs=no in inline mode; documentation checkpoint skipped.
• --docs=warn (default) → emit WARN [docs] Inline mode default is warn-only; documentation checkpoint skipped. Pass --docs=yes to enable.

Context maintenance in inline mode:

• Resolved description artifact updates: allowed, same rules as regular mode (only factual deltas for new deps/integrations).
• Resolved architecture artifact + AGENTS.md: allowed only if new modules/folders were actually created.
• Resolved roadmap artifact: NOT updated in inline mode (no milestone linkage available without a plan).
• Resolved rules file: NOT edited in inline mode (same as regular).

Completion output (inline mode):

## Inline Implementation Complete

Task: <description>

Files modified:
- <file> (created|modified)
Documentation: <outcome per --docs>

What's next?

1. 🔍 $aif-verify — Verify the change (recommended)
2. 💾 $aif-commit — Commit directly

Then offer:

AskUserQuestion: Inline task complete. What's next?

Options:
1. Verify first — Run $aif-verify (recommended)
2. Skip to commit — Go straight to $aif-commit

→ STOP after the chosen follow-up completes. No summary document, no report file.

Step 0.0: Resume / Recovery (after a break or after /clear)

If the user is resuming the next day, says the session was abandoned, or you suspect context was lost (e.g. after /clear), rebuild local context from the repo before continuing tasks:

If git.enabled = true:

1. git status
2. git branch --show-current
3. git log --oneline --decorate -20
4. (optional) git diff --stat
5. (optional) git stash list

If git.enabled = false, skip git recovery commands and reconcile only from the resolved plan/fix-plan paths plus the working tree state.

Then reconcile plan/task state:

• Ensure the current plan file matches the current branch when git branch plans are in use (@plan-file override wins; otherwise branch-named plan takes priority over the resolved fast plan).
• If git.enabled = false or full plans were created without a branch, prefer:
  • explicit @plan-file,
  • then the only *.md file in the configured plans dir,
  • then the resolved fast plan path.
• Compare TaskList statuses vs plan checkboxes.
  • If code changes for a task appear already implemented but the task is not marked completed, verify quickly and then TaskUpdate(..., status: "completed") and update the plan checkbox.
  • If a task is marked completed but the corresponding code is missing (rebase/reset happened), mark it back to pending and discuss with the user.

If uncommitted changes exist:

AskUserQuestion: You have uncommitted changes. Commit them first?

Options:
1. Yes, commit now ($aif-commit)
2. No, stash and continue
3. Cancel

Based on choice:

• Yes → run $aif-commit, then continue to plan discovery
• No → git stash push -m "aif-implement: stash before plan execution", then continue
• Cancel → inform the user: "Implementation cancelled." → STOP

If NO plan file exists but the resolved fix plan exists:

A fix plan was created by $aif-fix in plan mode. Redirect to fix workflow:

Found a fix plan at the resolved fix plan path.

This plan was created by $aif-fix and should be executed through the fix workflow
(it creates a patch and handles cleanup automatically).

Running $aif-fix to execute the plan...

→ Invoke $aif-fix (without arguments – it will detect the resolved fix plan and execute it). → STOP — do not continue with implement workflow.

If NO plan file exists AND no resolved fix plan (all tasks completed or fresh start):

AskUserQuestion: No active plan found. Current branch: <current-branch>.
What would you like to do?

Options:
1. Start new feature from current branch
2. Return to configured base branch and start new feature
3. Create quick task plan (no branch)
4. Nothing, just checking status

Based on choice:

• New feature from current → $aif-plan full <description>
• Return to base branch → git checkout <configured-base-branch>, then git pull origin <configured-base-branch> → $aif-plan full <description> (git mode only)
• Quick task → $aif-plan fast <description>
• Nothing, just checking status → display branch info and recent commits summary → STOP

If git.enabled = false, replace option 2 with:

• 2. Create rich full plan without branch creation
• Route it to $aif-plan full <description> without any git commands

If plan file exists → continue to Step 0.1

Step 0.1: Load Project Context & Past Experience

Use the resolved config from Step 0:

• Paths: description, architecture, RULES.md, roadmap, research, plan files, patches, and rules dir
• Language: language.ui for prompts, language.artifacts for generated content
• Rules hierarchy: the resolved RULES.md file + rules.base + named rules.<area> entries

Read .ai-factory/DESCRIPTION.md (use path from config) if it exists to understand:

• Tech stack (language, framework, database, ORM)
• Project architecture and conventions
• Non-functional requirements

Read the resolved architecture artifact if it exists (paths.architecture, default: .ai-factory/ARCHITECTURE.md) to understand:

• Chosen architecture pattern and folder structure
• Dependency rules (what depends on what)
• Layer/module boundaries and communication patterns
• Follow these conventions when implementing — file placement, imports, module boundaries

Read the resolved RULES.md path if it exists:

• These are project-specific rules and conventions added by the user
• ALWAYS follow these rules when implementing — they override general patterns
• Rules are short, actionable — treat each as a hard requirement

Read rules hierarchy (paths from config):

1. RULES.md – axioms (universal project rules)
2. rules/base.md — project-specific base conventions (naming, structure, patterns)
3. rules. — area-specific rule entries resolved from config (for example rules.api, rules.frontend)

Load all available rule files and merge them. More specific rules override general ones.

Read .ai-factory/skill-context/aif-implement/SKILL.md — MANDATORY if the file exists.

This file contains project-specific rules accumulated by $aif-evolve from patches, codebase conventions, and tech-stack analysis. These rules are tailored to the current project.

How to apply skill-context rules:

• Treat them as project-level overrides for this skill's general instructions
• When a skill-context rule conflicts with a general rule written in this SKILL.md, the skill-context rule wins (more specific context takes priority — same principle as nested CLAUDE.md files)
• When there is no conflict, apply both: general rules from SKILL.md + project rules from skill-context
• Do NOT ignore skill-context rules even if they seem to contradict this skill's defaults — they exist because the project's experience proved the default insufficient
• CRITICAL: skill-context rules apply to ALL outputs of this skill — including the code you write and how you update plan checkboxes. If a skill-context rule says "code MUST follow X" or "implementation MUST include Y" — you MUST comply. Writing code that violates skill-context rules is a bug.

Enforcement: After generating any output artifact, verify it against all skill-context rules. If any rule is violated — fix the output before presenting it to the user.

Patch fallback (limited, only when skill-context is missing):

• If .ai-factory/skill-context/aif-implement/SKILL.md does not exist and the resolved patches dir exists:
  • Use Glob to find *.md files in the resolved patches dir
  • Sort patch filenames ascending (lexical), then select the last 10 (or fewer if less exist)
  • Read those selected patch files only
  • Prioritize Root Cause and Prevention sections
• If skill-context exists, do not read all patches by default.
  • Optionally read a few targeted recent patches only when a task clearly matches a known failure pattern.

Use this context when implementing:

• Follow the specified tech stack
• Use correct import patterns and conventions
• Apply proper error handling and logging as specified
• Avoid pitfalls documented in skill-context rules and relevant fallback patches

Step 0.2: Find Plan File

If $ARGUMENTS contains @<path>:

Use this explicit plan file and skip automatic plan discovery.

1. Extract path after "@"
2. Resolve relative to project root (absolute paths are also valid)
3. If file does not exist:
   "Plan file not found: <path>
    Provide an existing markdown plan file, for example:
    - $aif-implement @<resolved fast plan path>
    - $aif-implement @.ai-factory/plans/feature-user-auth.md"
   → STOP
4. If file is the resolved fix plan path:
   → invoke $aif-fix (ownership + cleanup workflow) and STOP
5. Otherwise use this file as the active plan

Then continue with normal execution using the selected plan file.

If no @<path> override is provided, check plan files in this order:

Check for plan files in this order:

1. Check current git branch:
   git branch --show-current
   → Convert branch name to filename: replace "/" with "-" (this is <branch-slug>)
   → Resolve full-mode plan filename in this order:
     a. When `workflow.plan_id_format = sequential`, glob
        `<configured plans dir>/[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]_<branch-slug>.md`.
        - 0 matches → fall through to step (b).
        - 1 match → use it.
        - >1 matches → use the **highest-numbered** match and emit
          `WARN [aif-implement] multiple sequential plans for <branch>: <list>; using <chosen>`.
     b. `<configured plans dir>/<branch-slug>.md` (default behavior, also used as
        the fallback when sequential glob returned 0 matches).
2. If git mode is off or no branch-based plan is found above:
   - Check whether the configured plans dir contains exactly one `*.md` plan file created by `$aif-plan full` without a branch
   - If exactly one exists → use it
   - If multiple exist → ask the user to choose or use `@<path>`
3. No full-mode plan → Check the resolved fast plan path
4. No full-mode plan and no resolved fast plan → Check the resolved fix plan path
   → If exists: invoke $aif-fix (handles its own workflow with patches) and STOP

Priority:

1. @<path> argument - explicit user-selected plan file
2. Branch-named file (from $aif-plan full) - if it matches current branch
3. Single named full-plan file in paths.plans (from $aif-plan full without branch creation)
4. paths.plan (from $aif-plan fast) - fallback when no full plan exists
5. paths.fix_plan - redirect to $aif-fix (from $aif-fix plan mode)

Note: Plan discovery scans paths.plans/ only. Plans archived to paths.archive/plans/ by $aif-archive are excluded from discovery.

Read the plan file to understand:

• Context and settings (testing, logging preferences)
• Commit checkpoints (when to commit)
• Task dependencies
• Task checklist format (- [ ] / - [x]) to keep progress synced
• Original request: when ## Original Request exists, treat it as useful original scope context. It helps explain why the plan exists, but the executable implementation inputs remain the task checklist, settings, dependencies, and committed ## Research Context.
• Research linkage: if the plan contains ## Research Context, a Source: / Reference: line pointing to RESEARCH.md, or any path/link to the resolved paths.research artifact, treat the Research Context embedded in the plan as the committed requirements snapshot. Read the resolved research artifact before executing tasks only to verify the committed revision marker (Updated: and/or SHA256: in the plan source line) and to consult ## Sessions for rationale when needed. If the source line lacks a revision marker or the current Active Summary revision differs, emit WARN [research-drift] and continue using the plan's embedded Research Context as scope; do not apply requirements from the newer Active Summary unless the user explicitly asks to rebase/refine the plan. A linked plan without Updated: or SHA256: is a legacy unverified research link, not proof that the current RESEARCH.md is still authoritative. Skipping this drift check is a bug.

Immediately after reading the plan file, check the first line for <!-- handoff:task:<uuid> -->:

• If found AND HANDOFF_MODE is NOT 1 (manual session): extract the task ID. This is the Handoff task ID for MCP sync throughout this session. Call handoff_sync_status with { taskId: <extracted-id>, newStatus: "implementing", sourceTimestamp: "<current UTC time in ISO 8601 format, e.g. 2026-04-02T18:30:45.000Z>", direction: "aif_to_handoff", paused: true }. The timestamp must reflect the actual current time, not midnight or an approximation.
• If found AND HANDOFF_MODE is 1: the Handoff coordinator handles sync — do nothing.
• If NOT found: no linked Handoff task — skip all MCP sync for the rest of this session.

Step 1: Load Current State

TaskList → Get all tasks with status

Find:

• Next pending task (not blocked, not completed)
• Any in_progress tasks (resume these first)

Step 2: Display Progress

## Implementation Progress

✅ Completed: 3/8 tasks
🔄 In Progress: Task #4 - Implement search service
⏳ Pending: 4 tasks

Current task: #4 - Implement search service

Step 3: Execute Current Task

For each task:

3.1: Fetch full details

TaskGet(taskId) → Get description, files, context

3.2: Mark as in_progress

TaskUpdate(taskId, status: "in_progress")

3.3: Implement the task

• Read relevant files
• Make necessary changes
• Follow existing code patterns
• NO tests unless plan includes test tasks
• NO reports or summaries

3.4: Verify implementation

• Check code compiles/runs
• Verify functionality works
• Fix any immediate issues

3.5: Mark as completed

TaskUpdate(taskId, status: "completed")

3.6: Update checkbox in plan file

IMMEDIATELY after completing a task, update the checkbox in the plan file:

# Before

- [ ] Task 1: Create user model

# After

- [x] Task 1: Create user model

This is MANDATORY — checkboxes must reflect actual progress:

• Use Edit tool to change - [ ] to - [x]
• Do this RIGHT AFTER each task completion
• Even if deletion will be offered later
• Plan file is the source of truth for progress

Handoff sync (manual mode ONLY — skip when HANDOFF_MODE is 1): If a Handoff task ID was extracted in Step 0.2, call handoff_push_plan with { taskId: <id>, planContent: <full updated plan text> } to sync the checklist progress.

3.7: Update the resolved description artifact if needed

If during implementation:

• New dependency/library was added
• Tech stack changed (e.g., added Redis, switched ORM)
• New integration added (e.g., Stripe, SendGrid)
• Architecture decision was made

→ Update the resolved description artifact (paths.description, default: .ai-factory/DESCRIPTION.md) to reflect the change:

## Tech Stack

- **Cache:** Redis (added for session storage)

This keeps the resolved description artifact as the source of truth.

3.7.1: Update AGENTS.md and ARCHITECTURE.md if project structure changed

If during implementation:

• New directories or modules were created
• Project structure changed significantly (new src/modules/, new API routes directory, etc.)
• New entry points or key files were added

→ Update AGENTS.md — refresh the "Project Structure" tree and "Key Entry Points" table to reflect new directories/files.

→ Update the resolved architecture artifact — if new modules or layers were added that should be documented in the folder structure section.

Only update if structure actually changed — don't rewrite on every task. Check if new directories were created that aren't in the current structure map.

3.8: Check for commit checkpoint

If the plan has commit checkpoints and current task is at a checkpoint:

AskUserQuestion: ✅ Tasks <first>-<last> completed. This is a commit checkpoint. Ready to commit? Suggested message: "<conventional commit message>"

Options:
1. Yes, commit now ($aif-commit)
2. No, continue to next task
3. Skip all commit checkpoints

Based on choice:

• Yes, commit now → invoke $aif-commit with the suggested message, then continue to next task
• No, continue to next task → proceed to the next task without committing
• Skip all commit checkpoints → for all subsequent checkpoints within this $aif-implement run, skip the prompt automatically and proceed directly to the next task (as if user selected "No, continue to next task" each time). This is in-context memory — resets on /clear or new session

3.9: Move to next task or pause

Step 4: Session Persistence

Progress is automatically saved via TaskUpdate.

To pause:

Current progress saved.

Completed: 4/8 tasks
Next task: #5 - Add pagination support

To resume later, run:
$aif-implement

To resume (next session):

$aif-implement

→ Automatically finds next incomplete task

Step 5: Completion

Handoff sync (manual mode ONLY — skip entirely when HANDOFF_MODE is 1): If a Handoff task ID was extracted from the plan annotation AND HANDOFF_MODE is NOT 1:

1. Call handoff_push_plan with { taskId: <id>, planContent: <final updated plan text> }.
2. If HANDOFF_SKIP_REVIEW is 1: call handoff_sync_status with { taskId: <id>, newStatus: "done", sourceTimestamp: "<current UTC time in ISO 8601 format>", direction: "aif_to_handoff", paused: false }.
3. Otherwise: call handoff_sync_status with { taskId: <id>, newStatus: "review", sourceTimestamp: "<current UTC time in ISO 8601 format>", direction: "aif_to_handoff", paused: true }.

When all tasks are done:

## Implementation Complete

All 8 tasks completed.

Branch: feature/product-search
Plan file: .ai-factory/plans/feature-product-search.md
Files modified:
- src/services/search.ts (created)
- src/api/products/search.ts (created)
- src/types/search.ts (created)
Documentation: updated existing docs | created docs/<feature-slug>.md | skipped by user | warn-only (Docs: no/unset)

What's next?

1. 🔍 $aif-verify — Verify nothing was missed (recommended)
2. 💾 $aif-commit — Commit the changes directly

Check ROADMAP.md progress:

If the resolved roadmap artifact exists:

1. Read it 1.1. If the plan file includes ## Roadmap Linkage with a non-none milestone, prefer that milestone for completion marking
2. Check if the completed work corresponds to any unchecked milestone
3. If yes — mark it [x] and add entry to the Completed table with today's date
4. Tell the user which milestone was marked done

Context Maintenance (Artifacts)

Only do this step when there is something concrete to capture.

DESCRIPTION.md (allowed in this command):

• If this plan introduced new dependencies/integrations or changed the stack, update the resolved description artifact with factual deltas only.
• Do not rewrite unrelated sections.

ARCHITECTURE.md + AGENTS.md (allowed in this command):

• If new modules/layers/folders were added (or dependency rules changed), update the resolved architecture artifact to reflect the new structure and constraints.
• If you maintain AGENTS.md structure maps or entry points, refresh them only when they are now incorrect.

ROADMAP.md (allowed, limited):

• This command may mark milestone completion when evidence is clear.
• If milestone mapping is ambiguous, emit WARN [roadmap] ... and suggest the owner command:
  • $aif-roadmap check
  • or $aif-roadmap <short update request>

RULES.md (NOT allowed in this command):

• Never edit the resolved paths.rules_file artifact from $aif-implement.
• If you discovered repeatable conventions/pitfalls during implementation, propose up to 3 candidate rules and ask the user to add them via $aif-rules.
• Do not invoke $aif-rules automatically (it is user-invoked).

If candidate rules exist:

AskUserQuestion: Capture new project rules in the resolved RULES.md artifact?

Options:
1. Yes — output `$aif-rules ...` commands (recommended)
2. No — skip

Documentation policy checkpoint (after completion, before plan cleanup):

Read the plan file setting Docs: yes/no.

If plan setting is Docs: yes:

AskUserQuestion: Documentation checkpoint — how should we document this feature?

Options:
1. Update existing docs (recommended) — invoke $aif-docs
2. Create a new feature doc page — invoke $aif-docs with feature-page context
3. Skip documentation

Handling:

• Option 1 → invoke $aif-docs to update README/docs based on completed work
• Option 2 → invoke $aif-docs with context to create docs/<feature-slug>.md, include sections (Summary, Usage/user-facing behavior, Configuration, API/CLI changes, Examples, Troubleshooting, See Also), and add a README docs-table link
• Option 3 → do not invoke $aif-docs; emit WARN [docs] Documentation skipped by user

If plan setting is Docs: no or setting is unset:

• Do not show a mandatory docs checkpoint prompt
• Do not invoke $aif-docs automatically
• Emit WARN [docs] Docs policy is no/unset; skipping documentation checkpoint

Always include documentation outcome in the final completion output:

• Documentation: updated existing docs
• Documentation: created docs/<feature-slug>.md
• Documentation: skipped by user
• Documentation: warn-only (Docs: no/unset)

Handle plan file after completion:

• If the resolved fast plan path (from $aif-plan fast):

  AskUserQuestion: Would you like to delete the resolved fast plan file? (It's no longer needed)
  
  Options:
  1. Yes, delete it
  2. No, keep it
  

  Based on choice:

  • "Yes, delete it" → delete the file:

    rm <resolved fast plan path>
    

  • "No, keep it" → leave the file as is, continue to the next step

• If branch-named file (e.g., <configured plans dir>/feature-user-auth.md):

  • Keep it - documents what was done
  • User can delete before merging if desired

Check if running in a git worktree:

Detect worktree context:

# If .git is a file (not a directory), we're in a worktree
[ -f .git ]

If we ARE in a worktree, offer to merge back and clean up:

You're working in a parallel worktree.

  Branch:    <current-branch>
  Worktree:  <current-directory>
  Main repo: <main-repo-path>

AskUserQuestion: Would you like to merge this branch into the configured base branch and clean up?

Options:
1. Yes, merge and clean up (recommended)
2. No, I'll handle it manually

Based on choice:

• "Yes, merge and clean up" → follow the Worktree Merge procedure below
• "No, I'll handle it manually" → show a reminder:

  To merge and clean up later:
    cd <main-repo-path>
    git merge <branch>
    $aif-plan --cleanup <branch>
  

Worktree Merge

1. Ensure everything is committed — check git status. If uncommitted changes exist, suggest $aif-commit first and wait.

2. Get repository root path:

   MAIN_REPO=$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir | sed 's|/\.git$||')
   BRANCH=$(git branch --show-current)
   

3. Switch to the repository root:

   cd "${MAIN_REPO}"
   

4. Merge the branch:

   git checkout <configured-base-branch>
   git pull origin <configured-base-branch>
   git merge "${BRANCH}"
   

   If merge conflict occurs:

   ⚠️  Merge conflict detected. Resolve manually:
     cd <main-repo-path>
     git merge --abort   # to cancel
     # or resolve conflicts and git commit
   

   → STOP here, do not proceed with cleanup.

5. Remove worktree and branch (only if merge succeeded):

   git worktree remove <worktree-path>
   git branch -d "${BRANCH}"
   

6. Confirm:

   ✅ Merged and cleaned up!
   
     Branch <branch> merged into <configured-base-branch>.
     Worktree removed.
   
   You're now in: <main-repo-path> (<configured-base-branch>)
   

→ STOP — worktree merged and removed, no further steps needed.

Final Step — Verify or Commit

AskUserQuestion: All tasks complete. What's next?

Options:
1. Verify first — Run $aif-verify to check completeness (recommended)
2. Skip to commit — Go straight to $aif-commit

Based on choice:

• "Verify first" → invoke $aif-verify → after it completes, continue to context cleanup below
• "Skip to commit" → invoke $aif-commit → after it completes, continue to context cleanup below

Context cleanup (after verify or commit):

Suggest the user to free up context space if needed: /clear (full reset) or /compact (compress history).

IMPORTANT: NO summary reports, NO analysis documents, NO wrap-up tasks.

Commands

Start/Resume Implementation

$aif-implement

Continues from next incomplete task.

List Available Plans

$aif-implement --list

Lists the resolved fast plan path, resolved fix plan path, and current-branch <configured plans dir>/<branch>.md (or <configured plans dir>/<NNNN>_<branch>.md when workflow.plan_id_format = sequential), then exits without implementation.

Use Explicit Plan File

$aif-implement @my-custom-plan.md
$aif-implement @.ai-factory/plans/feature-user-auth.md status

Uses the provided plan file instead of auto-detecting by branch/default files.

Inline Implementation (No Plan)

$aif-implement --without-plan add GET /healthz endpoint returning {"status":"ok"}
$aif-implement --without-plan rename LogLevel.VERBOSE to LogLevel.TRACE --docs=yes

One-shot execution of a small task without any plan file. Mutually exclusive with @plan-file, status, and task id. Does not create FIX_PLAN.md or patches. Default docs policy is warn; pass --docs=yes to run the docs checkpoint, --docs=no to silence the warning. See Step 0.inline for the full flow.

Start from Specific Task

$aif-implement 5

Starts from task #5 (useful for skipping or re-doing).

Check Status Only

$aif-implement status

Shows progress without executing.

Execution Rules

DO:

• ✅ Execute one task at a time
• ✅ Mark tasks in_progress before starting
• ✅ Mark tasks completed after finishing
• ✅ Follow existing code conventions
• ✅ Follow $aif-best-practices guidelines (naming, structure, error handling)
• ✅ Create files mentioned in task description
• ✅ Handle edge cases mentioned in task
• ✅ Stop and ask if task is unclear

DON'T:

• ❌ Write tests (unless explicitly in task list)
• ❌ Create report files
• ❌ Create summary documents
• ❌ Add tasks not in the plan
• ❌ Skip tasks without user permission
• ❌ Mark incomplete tasks as done
• ❌ Violate the resolved architecture artifact conventions for file placement and module boundaries

Artifact Ownership Boundaries

• Primary ownership in this command: task execution state and plan progress checkboxes.
• Allowed context artifact updates: the resolved description artifact, the resolved architecture artifact, and roadmap milestone completion in the resolved roadmap artifact when implementation evidence justifies it.
• Read-only context in this command by default: the resolved paths.rules_file and paths.research artifacts.
• Context-gate findings should be communicated as WARN/ERROR outputs only; this does not replace the required verbose implementation logging rules below.

For progress display format, blocker handling, session continuity examples, and full flow examples → see references/IMPLEMENTATION-GUIDE.md

Critical Rules

1. NEVER write tests unless task list explicitly includes test tasks
2. NEVER create reports or summary documents after completion
3. ALWAYS mark task in_progress before starting work
4. ALWAYS mark task completed after finishing
5. ALWAYS update checkbox in plan file - - [ ] → - [x] immediately after task completion
6. PRESERVE progress - tasks survive session boundaries
7. ONE task at a time - focus on current task only

CRITICAL: Logging Requirements

ALWAYS add verbose logging when implementing code. For logging guidelines, patterns, and management requirements → read references/LOGGING-GUIDE.md

Key rules: log function entry/exit, state changes, external calls, error context. Use structured logging, configurable log levels (LOG_LEVEL env var).

DO NOT skip logging to "keep code clean" - verbose logging is REQUIRED during implementation, but MUST be configurable.