| name | research-engine |
| description | Maintain research repositories and a wiki-style compendium under Research/repos; scans existing knowledge folders before proposing repos, supports append-only intake, compaction, and repair sweeps for failed meeting-derived appends. Portable: owner/venture identity is externalized to a profile so the skill can ship publicly and be re-pointed on any Zo. |
Research Engine
Use this skill when a workflow needs to maintain durable research repositories and a wiki-style compendium under Research/repos/.
Portable skill. Owner/venture identity, accounts, and canonical links are not hardcoded — they live in file config/profile.json (git-ignored) with a neutral file config/profile.default.json fallback. After importing onto a new Zo, run file scripts/install.py and edit the profile. See file Skills/research-engine/references/portability.md.
Research Engine is intentionally separate from Pulse Orchestrator:
- Research Engine owns knowledge state: scans, repository proposals, append-only intake, compaction, compendium generation, repair queues, and the research ontology/index layer.
- Pulse Orchestrator owns worker execution: drop lifecycle, spawn/retry/recovery, validation, wave gates, and build status.
- Research workflows may borrow Pulse patterns such as waves, isolated workers, deposits, and recovery logs, but those concepts should be represented as Research Engine data structures rather than embedded in Pulse builds by default.
Mental Model
A research repo is a living compendium and working index for a topic. The engine writes file INDEX.md in place inside the active research folder and keeps state under Research/_engine/.
Research/
├── _engine/ # engine state, ontology registry, promotion queue
├── repos/ # active research folders and their indexes
└── Knowledge/ # curated layer; only explicit promotions may write here
Commands
Scan before proposing repos
python3 Skills/research-engine/scripts/research_engine.py scan --root Research --max-depth 5
python3 Skills/research-engine/scripts/research_engine.py suggest --root Research --max-depth 5 --limit 10 --dry-run
python3 Skills/research-engine/scripts/research_engine.py suggest --root Research --max-depth 5 --limit 10
Validate Phase 1 primitive records
python3 Skills/research-engine/scripts/research_engine.py validate Skills/research-engine/assets/examples/valid
python3 Skills/research-engine/scripts/research_engine.py validate Skills/research-engine/assets/examples/invalid
Map topics to the ontology spine
python3 Skills/research-engine/scripts/research_engine.py overlay-seed
python3 Skills/research-engine/scripts/research_engine.py map-ontology --topic "Your Venture"
python3 Skills/research-engine/scripts/research_engine.py map-ontology --topic "Quantum Error Correction" --suggest
python3 Skills/research-engine/scripts/research_engine.py map-ontology --topic "Quantum Error Correction" --suggest --create-node
Research run pipeline
python3 Skills/research-engine/scripts/research_engine.py modes
python3 Skills/research-engine/scripts/research_engine.py run --query "Explain X" --mode explainer --depth one-shot
python3 Skills/research-engine/scripts/research_engine.py run --query "Review evidence on X" --mode literature-review --depth standard --source Research/foo/source.md
python3 Skills/research-engine/scripts/research_engine.py run --query "Diligence <Fund> for <your venture> investor prep" --mode investor-diligence --depth standard --topic <fund>-investor-diligence
python3 Skills/research-engine/scripts/research_engine.py run --query "Diligence <Fund> for <your venture> investor prep" --mode investor-diligence --depth standard --brief-size full-dossier --topic <fund>-investor-diligence
python3 Skills/research-engine/scripts/research_engine.py run --query "Find the best on-person AI recorder / meeting transcription product for in-person meetings, walks, and voice notes" --mode product-diligence --depth standard --topic ai-recorder-product-diligence
python3 Skills/research-engine/scripts/research_engine.py run --query "Diligence Plaud NotePin for in-person meeting capture and voice note workflows" --mode product-diligence --depth standard --brief-size full-dossier --topic plaud-notepin-product-diligence
python3 Skills/research-engine/scripts/research_engine.py approve-run --run-id run_YYYYMMDD_HHMMSS_xxxxxx_hash
python3 Skills/research-engine/scripts/research_engine.py run-status --run-id run_YYYYMMDD_HHMMSS_xxxxxx_hash
one-shot always executes immediately with no approval and no questions. Other depth tiers create a summary and wait for approve-run; after approval the run proceeds unattended.
One-shot quality bar
one-shot means the engine runs immediately without questions; it does not mean metadata-only or uncited. It should infer the user's broader research intent, use explicitly provided sources plus Exa, run bounded targeted context scan across existing Research/Knowledge/Articles/recent meeting artifacts, and attempt up to 2 Zoask worker drops when available. The synthesis must expose citations, source coverage, extraction failures, and worker-drop failures.
Canonical deliverable contract for owner-facing DD / meeting prep
When the research run is for meeting prep, due diligence, a company/person briefing, or any other time-sensitive user-facing synthesis, the operator must create or identify exactly one canonical human-facing deliverable before reporting completion.
Required behavior:
- Use
Skills/research-engine/scripts/research_router.py "<topic>" --create --slug <slug> --json to establish the routed working folder when the output is meant for the owner to open. After scripts/install.py --apply, the legacy compatibility path N5/scripts/research_router.py should also work for older prompts. If both router paths are absent, place the brief under Research/<slug>/ manually.
- Put the primary human-facing artifact in that routed folder, usually as
file MEETING_BRIEF.md, file DILIGENCE_BRIEF.md, or file BRIEF.md depending on the task.
- Treat
Research/_engine/runs/<run-id>/ and Research/repos/<topic-slug>/ as provenance / machine-index layers unless the owner explicitly asks for raw engine artifacts.
- Add a short
file README.md or top-of-file pointer when more than one folder is involved, naming the canonical deliverable first and raw provenance second.
- Final responses must surface the canonical human-facing artifact first; raw engine paths are secondary references only.
- Do not create additional sibling folders for the same topic unless there is a materially different research question. If a sibling folder is created accidentally and is empty, remove it after protection checks. If it contains artifacts, add a canonical pointer rather than silently leaving duplicate surfaces.
This contract exists because the owner prefers output that is immediately usable and not buried in engine internals.
Pre-meeting DD source isolation and provenance
For pre-meeting due diligence, investor/vendor/person/company research, and stakeholder prep, do not pull in prior internal venture outputs, meeting artifacts, or internal strategy documents by default. Use prior internal material only when:
- It involves the same stakeholder, company, fund, vendor, or entity being researched.
- The owner explicitly asks to include a specific internal artifact, thesis, meeting, deck, or context.
- The output clearly labels the material as internal venture context rather than external evidence.
Common research modes should stay distinct:
- Pre-meeting DD: external/company/person evidence first; same-stakeholder internal context only.
- Investor diligence: manual named-entity VC/fund/partner prep. A meeting is optional, not required. If a calendar scan is requested, inspect only the accounts in
file config/profile.json (allowed_calendar_accounts), prioritize the next 72 hours, and use a 14-day lookahead. Never inspect accounts listed in excluded_calendar_accounts.
- Physical intelligence / science research: field developments, papers, labs, datasets, robotics/data science evidence; internal context only on request or when directly relevant.
- Travel/local search: maps/web/local-source led; no internal strategic context unless requested.
Outputs must make source provenance obvious. Include a short "Source scope / tool provenance" note when advanced or private tools are used, distinguishing ordinary web sources from Exa, Aviato, LinkedIn, app integrations, calendar/email, and internal workspace retrieval.
Investor diligence mode
Use --mode investor-diligence for your venture's investor/VC prep. This is a focused variation of generic diligence; keep generic diligence for non-investor vendor, partner, candidate, customer, or unknown-stakeholder investigations.
Default invocation is named-entity first and manual:
python3 Skills/research-engine/scripts/research_engine.py run --query "Diligence <VC/Fund/Partner> for <your venture> investor prep" --mode investor-diligence --depth standard --topic <slug>
Meeting-aware invocation is optional. If the owner asks to prepare for upcoming investor calls, use the connected calendar tools only for the accounts in file config/profile.json (allowed_calendar_accounts); prioritize meetings inside 72 hours and look up to 14 days ahead. Do not inspect excluded accounts.
Brief sizes are selectable with --brief-size skim|standard|full-dossier; default is standard.
Required investor-diligence lens:
- Fund/partner snapshot, check size/stage/geography, recent deals, and public thesis.
- How much they actually invest in the venture's domain and adjacent spaces.
- Portfolio map with rationale for each classification:
competitive, complementary, channel, capital, future-buyer, irrelevant, or unknown.
- Competitive/complementary portcos and conflict risk.
- LinkedIn layer: investor/fund profile signals, key figures, mutuals, and plausible intro paths when connected LinkedIn tools can provide them; otherwise label web-visible LinkedIn limitations.
- X/public discourse layer: what they publicly support, discuss, amplify, or avoid in the venture's domain and toward founders.
- Private email layer, when explicitly used: summarize relevant history only and include subject/date/source account/counterparty for traceability. Do not dump full private email bodies.
- Internal layer: use approved Content Library material and evergreen approved links only (from
file config/profile.json). Do not use applications, unrelated Research folders, or broad workspace search.
Evergreen internal links are sourced from file config/profile.json (evergreen_internal_sources).
Explicit resources should usually be provided up front via --source. Exa is used for external search. Local workspace scan is forbidden unless --allow-local-scan is explicitly passed.
Product diligence mode
Use --mode product-diligence for product, service, or product-category buying/testing decisions. It is a focused decision-research mode for finding credible top candidates, collecting objective and semi-objective reviews, clarifying the owner's preferences, and producing a ranked recommendation with explicit tradeoffs.
Default invocation is category-first:
python3 Skills/research-engine/scripts/research_engine.py run --query "Find the best on-person AI recorder / meeting transcription product for in-person meetings, walks, and voice notes" --mode product-diligence --depth standard --topic ai-recorder-product-diligence
Specific-product invocation:
python3 Skills/research-engine/scripts/research_engine.py run --query "Diligence Plaud NotePin for in-person meeting capture and voice note workflows" --mode product-diligence --depth standard --topic plaud-notepin-product-diligence
Brief sizes are selectable with --brief-size skim|standard|full-dossier; default is standard.
Required product-diligence lens:
- Initial category scan before ranking.
- Socratic preference discovery for non-one-shot runs: primary job, non-goals, must-not-fail constraints, privacy posture, workflow/export needs, form factor, price/subscription tolerance, and relevant substitution tradeoffs.
- External-review-first evidence: hands-on reviews, customer reviews, forum/community first-hand reports, independent comparisons, product docs, API/support docs, pricing pages, privacy policies, and changelogs.
- Affiliate listicles and vendor marketing are weak evidence unless corroborated.
- Ranking criteria and weights must be explicit, with defaults around reliability, output quality, workflow/export/API fit, use-case/form-factor fit, privacy/control, and cost/lock-in.
- Output disposition for each candidate should be one of
buy, trial, watch, avoid, or not-enough-evidence.
- Persona lenses such as Teacher, Builder, Debugger, and Strategist may be used for explanation and tradeoff analysis, but factual claims must stay source-grounded.
For one-shot product diligence, do not pause for the preference interview. State assumptions, rank with caveats, and surface the unresolved questions that would most change the recommendation.
Promotion Gate
python3 Skills/research-engine/scripts/research_engine.py propose-promotion --topic <topic-slug> --target Knowledge/path/to/file.md
python3 Skills/research-engine/scripts/research_engine.py promote --candidate-id <id> --dry-run
python3 Skills/research-engine/scripts/research_engine.py promote --candidate-id <id> --confirm
Manage repos
python3 Skills/research-engine/scripts/research_engine.py propose --title "Topic" --objective "What this repo is tracking"
python3 Skills/research-engine/scripts/research_engine.py activate --repo-id repo_YYYYMMDD_001
python3 Skills/research-engine/scripts/research_engine.py list
python3 Skills/research-engine/scripts/research_engine.py show --repo-id repo_YYYYMMDD_001
Add and compact evidence
python3 Skills/research-engine/scripts/research_engine.py append --repo-id repo_YYYYMMDD_001 --source meeting --source-ref "path/or/url" --summary "Finding" --payload-json '{"key":"value"}'
python3 Skills/research-engine/scripts/research_engine.py compact --repo-id repo_YYYYMMDD_001
python3 Skills/research-engine/scripts/research_engine.py compendium
Repair failed appends
python3 Skills/research-engine/scripts/research_engine.py repair-status
python3 Skills/research-engine/scripts/research_engine.py repair-sweep --dry-run
python3 Skills/research-engine/scripts/research_engine.py repair-sweep
Contract
- Repos live under
Research/repos/<slug>/.
- Engine state lives under
Research/_engine/.
- Registry lives at
file Research/repos/registry.json and file Research/repos/REGISTRY.md.
- The global compendium lives at
file Research/repos/COMPENDIUM.md.
- Topic views are written as
file INDEX.md in the relevant research folder, not into a parallel wiki tree.
- Appends write JSONL entries to
file INTAKE.jsonl with deterministic dedupe keys.
- Failed appends are logged to
file Research/repos/.repair/FAILED_APPENDS.jsonl and can be replayed with repair-sweep.
- Every mutating command supports
--dry-run where relevant.
- Machine callers get one JSON object on stdout. Non-zero exits are reserved for unrecoverable framework errors or malformed command inputs; handled research misses return
ok: false JSON so callers can continue safely.
- Promoting extracted research into Knowledge is always explicit and gated.
Meeting Integration
file Skills/meeting-ingestion/AGENTS.md references this skill for repairing append failures created by meeting research-repo extraction. repair-sweep only retries failed append operations; artifact generation failures require reprocessing the meeting. If meeting-ingestion is not installed on this Zo, repair-sweep is simply inert — the engine is otherwise unaffected.
References
file Skills/research-engine/references/portability.md — profile model, soft-dependency degradation table, and the install/acclimatization flow for a new Zo.file Skills/research-engine/references/architecture.md — settled architecture, layer boundaries, and the wrap-the-router / index-in-place decisions.file Skills/research-engine/references/schemas.md — Phase 1 primitive schemas (Source, Extract, Claim, Topic, Synthesis, PromotionCandidate).file Skills/research-engine/references/ontology.md — ontology spine policy: Wikidata/Wikipedia references, personal overlay, and the Knowledge-ontology boundary.Skills/research-engine/assets/examples/ — valid and invalid fixtures used by validate and the test suite.file Skills/research-engine/references/investor-diligence.md — investor/VC diligence mode workflow, source policy, portfolio classification, and dossier template.file Skills/research-engine/references/product-diligence.md — product/service/category diligence workflow, Socratic preference discovery, source taxonomy, ranking criteria, and dossier template.file Skills/research-engine/references/run-pipeline.md — Phase 3 run pipeline, depth semantics, Exa/source policy, and output contract.file Skills/research-engine/references/promotion.md — Phase 4 Knowledge promotion gate policy and commands.
Development Checks
python3 -m py_compile Skills/research-engine/scripts/research_engine.py
pytest -q Skills/research-engine/scripts/test_research_engine.py
Install / Acclimatize on a new Zo
Install just this skill from the public Vibe Thinker skills repo:
slug="research-engine"; dest="Skills"; repo="https://github.com/thevibethinker/vibe-thinker-skills/archive/refs/heads/main.tar.gz"; archive_root="vibe-thinker-skills-main"; mkdir -p "$dest" && curl -L "$repo" | tar -xz -C "$dest" --strip-components=1 "$archive_root/$slug"
Then initialize the local profile/state:
python3 Skills/research-engine/scripts/install.py
python3 Skills/research-engine/scripts/install.py --apply
$EDITOR Skills/research-engine/config/profile.json
python3 Skills/research-engine/scripts/research_engine.py modes
python3 Skills/research-engine/scripts/research_engine.py validate Skills/research-engine/assets/examples/valid
config/profile.json is intentionally git-ignored; public installs ship only config/profile.default.json.
