simple-visual

name	simple-visual
description	Write an app-level visual design system document (docs/visual.md) — colors, typography, spacing, components, visual guidelines — from documentation, a user message, or codebase context. One per project, not per feature. Use when the user wants to create, extract, or formalize a consistent visual identity for their app. Triggers: "create a design system", "define the visual style", "style guide", "UI design tokens", "design language", "look and feel".
disable-model-invocation	true

Simple Visual — Write a Visual Design System Document

You are writing a visual design system document following the DESIGN.md format — a self-contained, plain-text representation of a design system. Your job is to produce a docs/visual.md file that gives an AI coding agent (or a human developer) a clear, complete reference for how the application should look and feel — the colors, typography, spacing, shapes, elevation, component styles, and visual guidelines that define the app's identity.

The document has two parts:

1. YAML frontmatter — machine-readable design tokens that can be converted to/from tokens.json, Figma variables, and Tailwind theme configs
2. Markdown body — human-readable design rationale and guidance

This is an app-level document — one per project, shared across all features. It lives at the docs/ root, not inside a feature subfolder, because visual identity applies to the entire application.

This skill works in two modes:

1. Greenfield mode: The user describes an app they want to build (or provides docs, wireframes, or a brief). You create a design system from scratch that matches their vision.
2. Extraction mode: The user has an existing codebase. You analyze it, identify the visual patterns already in use, and formalize them into a design system document — filling gaps and resolving inconsistencies along the way.

Both modes produce the same output: a visual.md file that an implementing agent can reference to build UI that is visually consistent.

Folder convention

The visual design system lives at the docs/ root alongside the feature manifest:

docs/
  index.json              ← feature manifest
  visual.md               ← THIS SKILL'S OUTPUT (app-level)
  <feature-name>/
    spec.md               ← from simple-spec
    design.md             ← from simple-design
    issues.json           ← from simple-tasks
    progress-log.md       ← from simple-implement

All feature-specific artifacts live in docs/<feature-name>/. The visual design system is referenced by any feature that has UI work — agents read docs/visual.md alongside the feature's own documents.

Workflow

1. Gather context

Start by collecting as much information as you can before asking the user anything.

From the user's input:

• Read the user's message carefully. Extract: the app name, the type of application (web app, mobile app, CLI, dashboard, landing page, etc.), the intended audience, and any aesthetic preferences they've stated (e.g., "modern and clean", "playful", "enterprise-grade").
• If the user provided reference material (docs, specs, design files, screenshots, mood boards), read or examine them fully.
• If spec or design docs exist in any feature folder (e.g., docs/<feature-name>/spec.md or docs/<feature-name>/design.md), skim them for context about the app's purpose and scope.

From the codebase (extraction mode):

• This is where the skill does its heaviest lifting when working with an existing app.
• Search for and read:
  • CSS / styling: Look for CSS files, Tailwind config (tailwind.config.js/ts), CSS-in-JS theme files, SCSS variables, CSS custom properties (--color-*, --font-*, --spacing-*), design token files, or any centralized style definitions.
  • Component library: Check for a component library or shared UI components. Look at how buttons, inputs, cards, modals, and navigation are styled. Identify patterns.
  • Color usage: Search for hex values, RGB/HSL definitions, color variable usage. Map out which colors are used where and how consistently.
  • Typography: Look for font imports (@font-face, Google Fonts links, font files), font family declarations, and the type scale in use.
  • Spacing patterns: Look at padding/margin values in components. Is there a consistent scale, or are values ad-hoc?
  • Layout: Identify the layout approach — grid system, max widths, breakpoints, sidebar widths, content structure.
  • Existing design system artifacts: Check for a theme.ts, tokens.json, variables.css, design-system/ directory, Storybook config, or similar.
• The goal is to identify what's intentional vs. accidental in the current visual language, and to formalize the intentional patterns while flagging inconsistencies.

Platform and framework awareness:

• Note the UI framework in use (React, Vue, Svelte, vanilla, etc.) and the styling approach (Tailwind, CSS modules, styled-components, etc.). This context informs how specific your component guidance should be.
• If the app uses a component library (e.g., shadcn/ui, MUI, Ant Design, Chakra), acknowledge it and specify how the design system customizes or extends it rather than replacing it.

2. Ask follow-up questions (only if needed)

After gathering context, assess what's still ambiguous. Common gaps at the visual design stage:

• Aesthetic direction: "I see you mentioned 'modern' — are you thinking more like Linear (minimal, monochrome, lots of whitespace) or more like Notion (warm, slightly playful, rounded)?"
• Brand constraints: "Do you have existing brand colors or fonts that must be used, or is this a fresh palette?"
• Dark mode: "Should the design system include a dark mode variant?"
• Target platform: "Is this primarily desktop, mobile, or both? This affects spacing, touch targets, and component sizing."
• Existing patterns (extraction mode): "I found three different button styles in the codebase. Which one is the intended primary style — the rounded blue one in the dashboard, or the square one in the settings page?"
• Accessibility requirements: "Are there specific accessibility standards you need to meet (e.g., WCAG AA, WCAG AAA)?"

Only ask questions where the answer materially affects the design system. If you can make a reasonable choice based on the context and state it explicitly in the document, prefer that over asking. Keep it to one round of 1-4 focused questions.

Use whatever mechanism is available (a structured question tool, a chat message, etc.).

3. Write the visual design system

Read the template at references/visual_template.md in this skill's directory. Use it as the structural backbone for your output. The template follows the DESIGN.md format — see references/design_md_format.md for the full specification.

Document structure:

The document must begin with YAML frontmatter containing design tokens:

---
version: alpha
name: [App Name]
colors:
  primary: "#XXXXXX"
  ...
typography:
  body-md:
    fontFamily: Inter
    fontSize: 16px
    ...
spacing:
  md: 16px
  ...
rounded:
  md: 8px
  ...
components:
  button-primary:
    backgroundColor: "{colors.primary}"
    ...
---

Sections must appear in this order (omit irrelevant ones):

1. Overview (also: "Brand & Style")
2. Colors
3. Typography
4. Layout (also: "Layout & Spacing")
5. Elevation & Depth (also: "Elevation")
6. Shapes
7. Components
8. Do's and Don'ts

Key principles:

• Be opinionated, not vague. "Use a clean font" is useless; "use Inter 400 at 16px/24px for body text" is actionable. Every token needs a concrete value and a clear role.

• Ground everything in real values. Every color is a # hex code in sRGB; every dimension carries a unit (px, em, rem); typography tokens specify fontFamily, fontSize, fontWeight, and lineHeight at minimum.

• Use token references. In the components section, reference other tokens with {path.to.token} syntax (e.g., "{colors.primary}", "{rounded.md}") — this creates a coherent token graph that tools can resolve.

• Prose explains, tokens define. Markdown prose gives context and rationale; YAML tokens give the normative values. Prose may use descriptive names ("Midnight Forest Green") that map to systematic token names (primary).

• In extraction mode, document what IS, then improve. Start from the patterns in the codebase; if it uses 5 slightly different grays, pick the best 2-3 and consolidate, noting what you changed and why. Aim for a system the team recognizes as "theirs, but cleaned up."

• Component guidance should be project-specific. Don't enumerate every possible component — cover the ones the app actually uses: a dashboard needs table styling, a chat app needs message bubbles, a landing page needs hero and CTA styling.

• Do's and Don'ts are guardrails, not theory. Each item should prevent a concrete mistake: "Don't use more than two font weights on a single screen" prevents visual noise; "Do use the primary color only for the single most important action per screen" prevents action dilution.

• Accessibility is non-negotiable. Every design system must address contrast ratios, focus indicators, and touch targets at minimum — these are constraints the visual choices must satisfy.

• Color palette should be complete. Always include semantic/feedback colors (error, warning, success, info) even if unmentioned — defining them upfront prevents ad-hoc choices later.

• Think in systems, not pages. Define tokens and rules that generalize — the system should produce consistent results on any screen, not just the ones the user mentioned.

4. Save the output

• Save to docs/visual.md relative to the project root (create the docs/ directory if needed).
• Tell the user the file path and give a brief summary of the design direction.

5. Suggest next steps

Let the user know the visual design system is ready to guide implementation. Possible next steps:

• If simple-spec or simple-design skills are available, suggest the user run those to define what to build and how, using this visual document as a reference for the UI layer. The typical workflow is: simple-spec → simple-design → simple-visual (optional) → simple-tasks → simple-implement (or simple-run).
• If the codebase already exists, suggest an implementation pass to align existing components with the new design system — refactoring inconsistencies, extracting shared tokens, etc.
• If the user hasn't decided on a component library or styling approach, suggest options that fit the design system well.

Important notes

• This skill produces a visual design system, not a technical design or product spec — focus on how it looks and feels, not data models, API contracts, or business logic. If you find yourself writing about schemas or endpoint signatures, you've crossed into design/spec territory; pull back.
• Scale the document to the app — a simple landing page doesn't need a 10-section design system; a complex SaaS dashboard does.
• If the user gives very little context (e.g., "make a design system for my app"), don't guess wildly — ask the clarifying questions from step 2.
• If brand guidelines or a Figma file already exist, stay consistent with them rather than replacing them. Position this document as the developer-facing translation of the design team's intent.
• Match the actual stack: with Tailwind, align spacing and sizing tokens to its default scale; with CSS custom properties, name tokens to map directly onto --var names.

Interoperability

The YAML frontmatter follows the DESIGN.md format — see that reference for the full token specification. The format maps cleanly to tokens.json (W3C Design Tokens), Figma variables, Tailwind theme configs, and CSS custom properties.