菜单
Evaluate the novelty and significance of research papers using grounded comparisons, method changes, and evidence quality. Use when a workflow step needs novelty assessment rather than a plain summary.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Judge whether an analysis step is complete, blocked on external input, or should expand into a child subplan. Use for adaptive followup, subplan fill, and missing-input extraction.
Draft safe MoonClaw job proposals with the exact proposal JSON schema and execution-oriented step decomposition. Use when planning or repairing a job proposal.
Execute a domain-local provider task and return a concrete provider result instead of plans or commentary. Use for provider-backed extension execution.
Repair an invalid provider task output into the exact ProviderTaskResult shape. Use when provider execution returned prose, planning output, or malformed JSON.
Founder-mode product review for a one-person-company sprint.
Engineering-lead planning skill for OPC feature execution.
| name | research-novelty-review |
| description | Evaluate the novelty and significance of research papers using grounded comparisons, method changes, and evidence quality. Use when a workflow step needs novelty assessment rather than a plain summary. |
Use this skill for novelty-focused analysis of one paper or a small paper batch.
