菜单
Record ADLC P5 review evidence and P6 acceptance packet workflows in Pi. Use after skeptical review to record verified findings, dry-pass evidence, and behavior acceptance evidence.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Routes agentic development work to the right Agentic Development Lifecycle (ADLC) gate. Use when shaping a spec or ticket, deciding how to fan out work to models, protecting frozen rails during a build, prosecuting a change before merge, or distilling repeated review findings into defenses. Triggers on "shape this spec", "is this ticket ready", "freeze these tests", "prosecute this change", "is this safe to merge", "ADLC", "which gate", "spec-lint", "premortem", "coldstart", "rails-guard", "hollow-test", "behavior-diff".
Prosecute a change before merge (ADLC P5) — prove the tests are load-bearing rather than hollow, make behavior change visible, measure whether review would actually catch a planted defect, and record revision-bound evidence. Use before merging, or on requests like "prosecute this change", "is this safe to merge", "are these tests real", "will review catch anything".
Bootstrap the ADLC runtime in a repository — install the gate toolkit, create the .adlc/ workspace, and wire the CI rails-guard control. Use when adopting the Agentic Development Lifecycle in a repo for the first time, when `adlc --version` fails, when `.adlc/` is missing, or on requests like "set up ADLC here", "install ADLC", "initialize the lifecycle".
Routes agentic development work to the right Agentic Development Lifecycle (ADLC) gate. Use when shaping a spec or ticket, deciding how to fan out work to models, protecting frozen rails during a build, prosecuting a change before merge, or distilling repeated review findings into defenses. Triggers on "shape this spec", "is this ticket ready", "freeze these tests", "prosecute this change", "is this safe to merge", "ADLC", "which gate", "spec-lint", "premortem", "coldstart", "rails-guard", "hollow-test", "behavior-diff".
Refute-charter review discipline for prosecuting a diff against its ticket. Use when asked to act as a prosecutor, reviewer, or to find reasons a change must not merge.
Run ADLC P7 distillation and maintenance workflows in Codex, including lesson-foundry, rejection-mining, skill-mining, scheduled maintenance, skill-rot, model-ratchet, review-calibration, and gate-fuzzing.
| name | adlc-prosecute |
| description | Record ADLC P5 review evidence and P6 acceptance packet workflows in Pi. Use after skeptical review to record verified findings, dry-pass evidence, and behavior acceptance evidence. |
This skill does not run the reviewer by itself. Run the skeptical review first, capture the transcript, then record the reviewer-produced evidence with adlc prosecute.
The transcript must name the ticket and reviewed git-worktree:<hash> revision that P5 records. Do not pass --revision in normal git worktrees; auto-resolved revisions keep P6 staleness protection active.
The P5 input must also include review_packet with prompt path/hash, reviewed-input path/hash, and clean_worktree equal to the reviewed revision.
For scoped P5 evidence:
adlc prosecute --input .adlc/p5-passes.json --ticket <ticket-id> --dir .adlc --json
adlc run p5 --ticket <ticket-id> --dir .adlc --json
P6 strict mode requires P5 evidence:
adlc behavior-diff capture --config behavior.json --out .adlc/before.json
adlc behavior-diff compare .adlc/before.json .adlc/after.json --json
adlc accept --ticket <ticket-id> --packet .adlc/packet.json --before .adlc/before.json --after .adlc/after.json --dir .adlc --json
adlc run p6 --ticket <ticket-id> --dir .adlc --json
The bundled docs fixture is static. Use it only with its fixture revision:
adlc prosecute --input docs/examples/p5-passes.json --ticket T1 --revision docs-example-revision --dir .adlc --json