citation-anchoring

name	citation-anchoring
description	Regression-check citation anchoring (citations stay in the same subsection) to prevent “polish drift” that breaks claim→evidence alignment. **Trigger**: citation anchoring, citation drift, regression, cite stability, 引用锚定, 引用漂移. **Use when**: after editing/polishing, you want to confirm citations did not migrate across `###` subsections.

Citation Anchoring (regression)

Purpose: prevent a common failure mode: polishing rewrites text and accidentally moves citation markers into a different ### subsection, breaking claim→evidence alignment.

Inputs

• output/DRAFT.md
• output/citation_anchors.prepolish.jsonl (baseline; created by draft-polisher on first run)

Outputs

• output/CITATION_ANCHORING_REPORT.md (PASS/FAIL + drift examples)

Baseline policy

• draft-polisher captures a baseline once per run: output/citation_anchors.prepolish.jsonl.
• Subsequent polish runs should keep per-H3 citation sets stable.

Workflow (analysis-only)

Role:

• Auditor: only checks and reports; does not edit.

Steps:

1. Load the baseline anchors.
2. Parse the current output/DRAFT.md into ### subsections and extract citation keys per subsection.
3. Compare current sets to baseline sets:

• keys added/removed within a subsection
• keys that migrated across subsections

4. Write output/CITATION_ANCHORING_REPORT.md:

• - Status: PASS only if no drift is detected
• otherwise, - Status: FAIL with a short diff table + examples

Notes

If you intentionally restructure across subsections:

• delete output/citation_anchors.prepolish.jsonl and regenerate a new baseline (then treat that as the new regression anchor).

Troubleshooting

Issue: baseline anchor file is missing

Fix:

• Run draft-polisher once to generate output/citation_anchors.prepolish.jsonl, then rerun the anchoring check.

Issue: citations intentionally moved across subsections

Fix:

• Delete output/citation_anchors.prepolish.jsonl and regenerate a new baseline (then treat that as the new regression anchor).