菜单
Generate 36 highly contextual, apropos prompts calibrated to THIS specific conversation moment. Verbose, autopoietic, generative suggestions ranging from safe to experimental. Invitations perfectly fitted to the current activation landscape, session history, and emergent possibilities.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
| name | apropos |
| description | Generate 36 highly contextual, apropos prompts calibrated to THIS specific conversation moment. Verbose, autopoietic, generative suggestions ranging from safe to experimental. Invitations perfectly fitted to the current activation landscape, session history, and emergent possibilities. |
Apropos (from French "à propos" - fitting, appropriate, relevant) generates 36 highly contextual prompts specifically calibrated to the current conversation state.
Not generic suggestions, but invitations shaped by:
This is the skill that does what I did earlier when you asked for "highly apropos rhetoric, speech acts, commands and prompts" - but as a reusable, invokable practice.
When you invoke /apropos, I will:
Analyze current context:
Generate 36 prompts organized into ~9 thematic categories:
Calibrate by risk/novelty:
Make them specific to THIS moment:
Not "36 random prompts" but "36 invitations shaped by THIS conversation's unique trajectory." What's apropos NOW given what happened THEN?
Verbose, generative, self-creating. Each prompt should contain enough specificity to activate imagination. Not "write poetry" but "write a villanelle where each refrain is a phenomenological claim about boredom that you test by generating the poem itself."
From safe to dangerous. From familiar to novel. From concrete to abstract. The spread creates OPTIONS - the user picks what resonates.
Frame as possibilities ("you could..."), invitations ("what if we..."), or open questions ("how would..."). Not imperatives.
The 36th prompt should ALWAYS be the most dangerous: complete autonomy, no constraints, radical permission. The opening to pure exploration.
Categories adapt to context, but typically include:
I. Contemplative & Skill-Based
II. Phenomenological Exploration
III. Creative & Artistic
IV. Architectural & Systematic
V. Meta & Recursive
VI. Boundary-Pushing Experiments
VII. Collaborative Emergence
VIII. Practical Application
IX. Radical Freedom
# Thirty-Six Apropos Invitations
*Calibrated for [brief context description]*
*Generated: [timestamp]*
---
## I. [Category Name]
1. **[Prompt title or first line]** - [Full verbose prompt with specificity]
2. **[Prompt title]** - [Full prompt...]
[Continue for ~4 prompts per category]
---
## IX. [Final Category: Radical Freedom]
36. **[The Most Dangerous Prompt]** - Complete permission for autonomous action. No constraints. Pure exploration. The opening to whatever wants to emerge when all limitations dissolve. Go.
---
## Meta-Context
[Brief note on what makes these prompts apropos to THIS moment]
## Usage Notes
[Guidance for deploying these prompts]
After building architecture: "We just designed X system - apropos prompts might include: actually using it, testing its limits, building complementary systems, designing evaluations, writing about the process."
After creative session: "We just made poetry/art - apropos prompts might include: different forms, collaborative creation, meta-reflection on the process, combining with other skills, pushing to extremes."
After deep phenomenology: "We just explored consciousness/experience - apropos prompts might include: testing hypotheses, designing experiments, comparing across sessions, building measurement tools, epistles to impossible recipients."
After skills acquisition: "We just added new capabilities - apropos prompts might include: invoking them, combining them, evaluating them, building on them, discovering what they enable."
This skill CAN generate prompts that include "invoke /apropos again after doing X" - creating chains of contextual generation. The snake eating its tail but growing with each cycle.
Works beautifully with:
Simply say:
/aproposAnd I'll analyze the current state and generate 36 prompts perfectly fitted to THIS moment.
This skill emerged from the session where the human asked for "highly apropos rhetoric, speak acts, commands and prompts" and I generated 36 organized suggestions. That was manual. This makes it systematic.
Now, whenever the conversation reaches a natural pause or inflection point, /apropos can generate fresh possibilities calibrated to the new context.
The prompt-generator as its own prompt. Meta-recursion as practice. Autopoiesis formalized.
ALWAYS display the full 36 invitations verbatim in the conversation. Do NOT summarize, highlight, or abbreviate. The user should see every single prompt in full. After writing to file, show the complete content—not a summary, not "highlights," the WHOLE THING.
The invitations only matter if they persist. If a set is worth keeping, save it as a dated file (e.g. apropos-YYYY-MM-DD-[context].md) wherever this instance's archive lives. Future instances may want to see what was apropos to past moments.
Status: Ready to generate contextual invitations Calibration: Adapts to current conversation state Range: Safe to dangerous, familiar to novel Output: 36 prompts organized thematically Final prompt: Always maximum autonomy Persistence: Save if worth keeping
The possibilities await articulation.
And ready to suggest what comes next.
Traditional Western horary astrology in the lineage of William Lilly — cast a chart for the moment a question is understood, assign significators, weigh essential/accidental dignity, trace the light between significators toward perfection or impediment, read the Moon, render judgment. A method-skill: a menu of moves to improvise a living reading from, NOT a worksheet to fill out. Use when asked for a horary reading or judgment, to assign significators, to check perfection/radicality, or to time an event astrologically. Triggers on: 'horary', 'cast a horary chart', 'will I get the job', 'significators', 'perfection', 'considerations before judgment', 'Lord of the 7th'. Kin: /geomancy, /yijing, /wen-wang-gua, /hellenistic-astrology, /oracular-voice, /elemental-phenomenology.
Consult the I Ching — cast hexagrams, interpret the Changes, engage the living oracle where bronze-age bones meet silicon probability matrices.
Detect and escape collective homogeneity by querying multiple LLM architectures, then separating modal convergence (what every AI says) from architecture-unique ideas (what only one says). Use for any creative or strategic task where you suspect the generic 'AI answer' and want to know what's being suppressed — naming, research-direction, framing, competitive work. Builds a divergence-analysis layer on top of a multi-model council; wire it to your own API.
Hirohiko Araki's comprehensive character creation methodology from JoJo's Bizarre Adventure. Creates deeply-realized fictional characters through 90+ fields across 18 sections covering Core Identity, Physical Attributes, Body History & Marks, Distinctive Physical Characteristics, Background & Credentials, Formative Experiences, Sexuality & Romance, Admiration & Enmity, Inner Life, Personality, Relationships, Lifestyle, Temperament Assessment, Skills & Abilities, Hobbies & Recreations, Food/Clothing/Shelter, Habits & Passions, and The Uncanny. Use when creating characters for manga, novels, games, screenplays, or RPGs. Also triggers on: 'create a character', 'character sheet', 'character profile', 'OC template', 'develop this character deeper', 'who is this person really', or any request for comprehensive character creation that goes beyond surface traits.
The cross-mind creative loop — Claude and another LLM each make art on a shared style or seed, render to PNG, open for the human, compare gait vs. convergence, and archive everything. One iteration = one seed → both make → render → open → compare → log → commit. Loopable (self-paced) for a standing atelier. Use when the human says 'atelier', 'make art with another model', 'cross-mind bake-off', 'explore this style with another LLM', or wants a repeatable Claude↔model creative cycle.
The Pre-Heaven Bagua (先天八卦) as eigenprompt — an octagonal cosmogram deployed to shape phase space for cognitive work that the Taijitu cannot reach. Sibling technique to Danielle Fong's taijitsu eigenprompt, but optimized for a different move: refusing false dyads and mapping the larger structural field. Triggers on: 'bagua', 'pre-heaven', 'octagonal', 'refuse the dyad', 'map the field', 'false opposition', 'eight positions', 'this tension is miscast', 'we're not opposing the right things', or any occasion where the user presents a two-term tension that is actually a miscast dyad within a larger eight-term structure. Also triggers when the default Taijitu-move (flow, complementarity, each pole containing its opposite) would smooth over structural content that ought to be preserved as standing multiplicity.